Visual control of hand action

Recent investigations in normal and brain-damaged individuals have begun to identify the types of visual information used to plan and guide reaches. Binocular visual cues have been shown to be important for both movement planning and on-line guidance of hand movements, while emerging evidence suggests that dynamic visual analysis of the moving limb may provide a rich source of information for precise control of the hand in flight. Reaching movements appear to be planned to follow what is perceived to be a straight trajectory in peripersonal space. Furthermore, the process of selecting visual targets appears to influence hand trajectories, with hand movements curving away from non-target objects. This behaviour may be explained most effectively by a dynamic representation of space which is sculpted by attentional mechanisms into selected (target) and inhibited (non-target) regions. The role of attention in movement planning in individuals with attentional disorders is controversial. Patients with visual neglect have impairments of visuomotor control including reaches that, under certain conditions, are significantly more curved than those of normal individuals. The representations of space that neglect patients use to plan reaches may be distorted by impairments in the mechanisms that normally act to select target regions and inhibit non-target zones.

[1]  Masud Husain,et al.  Visuomotor functions of the lateral pre-motor cortex , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Impairments of movement execution in unilateral neglect: A kinematic analysis of directional bradyskinesia , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  L. Henderson,et al.  Parkinson's disease and the internal control of action: A single-case study , 1995 .

[5]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional anatomy of pointing and grasping in humans. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  M. Perenin,et al.  Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies edited by Ian H. Robertson and John C. Marshall , 1994 .

[8]  A. Milner,et al.  Spatial Bias in Visually-Guided Reaching and Bisection Following Right Cerebral Stroke , 1994, Cortex.

[9]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: anatomic location and visual response properties. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Kenneth M. Heilman,et al.  Directional hypokinesia , 1985, Neurology.

[11]  M. Jeannerod The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[12]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Dissociation of ophthalmokinetic and melokinetic attention in unilateral neglect. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Distinguishing Sensory and Motor Deficits After Parietal Damage: An Evaluation of Response Selection Biases in Unilateral Neglect , 1997 .

[15]  M Jeannerod,et al.  Visual pathways for object-oriented action and object recognition: functional anatomy with PET. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  M A Goodale,et al.  Kinematic analysis of limb movements in neuropsychological research: subtle deficits and recovery of function. , 1990, Canadian journal of psychology.

[18]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  R. Tegnér,et al.  Through a looking glass. A new technique to demonstrate directional hypokinesia in unilateral neglect. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Sensory-motor coordination during grasping and manipulative actions , 1992, Current Biology.

[21]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[22]  J. Phillips,et al.  Impairments of movement initiation and execution in unilateral neglect. Directional hypokinesia and bradykinesia. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  P. Roland,et al.  Fields in human motor areas involved in preparation for reaching, actual reaching, and visuomotor learning: a positron emission tomography study , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  H. Sakata,et al.  Selectivity of the parietal visual neurones in 3D orientation of surface of stereoscopic stimuli. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[25]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Reaching to Grasp: Evidence for Distractor Interference Effects , 1997 .

[26]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  Study of selective reaching and grasping in a patient with unilateral parietal lesion. Dissociated effects of residual spatial neglect. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Tracy L. Faber,et al.  Role of posterior parietal cortex in the recalibration of visually guided reaching , 1996, Nature.

[29]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Early stages in a sensorimotor transformation , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  R. Andersen,et al.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Hand and brain : the neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements , 1996 .

[32]  Jürgen Konczak,et al.  Kinematics of goal-directed arm movements in neglect: Control of hand in space , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  M. L. Rusconi,et al.  Perceptual and premotor factors of unilateral neglect , 1990, Neurology.

[34]  S. Jackson,et al.  A Kinematic Analysis of Goal-directed Prehension Movements Executed under Binocular, Monocular, and Memory-guided Viewing Conditions , 1997 .

[35]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis , 1992, Vision Research.

[36]  S. Chieffi,et al.  Visual illusion and action , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  M. Goodale,et al.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand , 1995, Current Biology.