Computational analyses of aortic blood flow under varying speed CF-LVAD support

Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices (CF-LVADs) generally operate at a constant speed whilst supporting a failing heart. However, constant speed CF-LVAD support may cause complications and increase the morbidity rates in the patients. Therefore, different varying speed operating modes for CF-LVADs have been proposed to generate more physiological blood flow, which may reduce complication rates under constant speed CF-LVAD support. The proposed varying speed CF-LVAD algorithms simulate time-dependant dynamics and three dimensional blood flow patterns in aorta under varying speed CF-LVAD support remain unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate three dimensional blood flow patterns in a patient-specific aorta model under co-pulsating and counter-pulsating CF-LVAD support modes driven by speed and flow rate control algorithms using numerical simulations. Aortic blood flow was evaluated for 10,000 rpm constant speed CF-LVAD support generating 4.71 L/min mean flow rate over a cardiac cycle. Co-pulsating and counter-pulsating CF-LVAD speed control operated the pump at the same average speed over a cardiac cycle and co-pulsating and counter-pulsating CF-LVAD flow rate control generated the same average flow rate over cardiac cycle as in the constant speed pump support. Simulation results show that the utilised counter-pulsating pump flow rate control may decrease the haemolysis to a third compared to the most commonly employed constant speed pump operating mode. Moreover, CF-LVAD support utilising counter-pulsating pump flow rate control generated the most favourable hemodynamic characteristics, i.e. low Dean number, least wall shear stress and least haemolysis values among the investigated cases.

[1]  Michele Rossi,et al.  A computational fluid dynamics comparison between different outflow graft anastomosis locations of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) in a patient‐specific aortic model , 2015, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[2]  Marcel C M Rutten,et al.  Arterial pulsatility improvement in a feedback-controlled continuous flow left ventricular assist device: an ex-vivo experimental study. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  L. Antiga,et al.  Outflow conditions for image-based hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation: implications for indicators of abnormal flow. , 2010, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  Kartik V. Bulusu,et al.  Non-Newtonian perspectives on pulsatile blood-analog flows in a 180° curved artery model , 2015 .

[5]  Eisuke Tatsumi,et al.  Change in myocardial oxygen consumption employing continuous-flow LVAD with cardiac beat synchronizing system, in acute ischemic heart failure models , 2013, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[6]  Karen May-Newman,et al.  Aortic valve pathophysiology during left ventricular assist device support. , 2010, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[7]  M. Ertan Taskin,et al.  Study of flow-induced hemolysis using novel Couette-type blood-shearing devices. , 2011, Artificial organs.

[8]  Pascal Leprince,et al.  Arterial Pulsatility and Circulating von Willebrand Factor in Patients on Mechanical Circulatory Support. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  S. Alper,et al.  Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. , 1999, JAMA.

[10]  Rüdiger Schwarze,et al.  Performance and limitations of the unsteady RANS approach , 2006 .

[11]  Young Choi,et al.  Rotary pump speed modulation for generating pulsatile flow and phasic left ventricular volume unloading in a bovine model of chronic ischemic heart failure. , 2015, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[12]  Eisuke Tatsumi,et al.  Development of a novel drive mode to prevent aortic insufficiency during continuous-flow LVAD support by synchronizing rotational speed with heartbeat , 2013, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[13]  Jeffrey Teuteberg,et al.  Management of Aortic Insufficiency in the Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Population , 2014, Current Heart Failure Reports.

[14]  Selim Bozkurt,et al.  In-silico evaluation of left ventricular unloading under varying speed continuous flow left ventricular assist device support , 2017 .

[15]  Pascal Verdonck,et al.  Unloading effect of a rotary blood pump assessed by mathematical modeling. , 2003, Artificial organs.

[16]  V. Agnese,et al.  Modeling Right Ventricle Failure After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Biventricular Finite-Element and Lumped-Parameter Analysis , 2018, Cardiovascular engineering and technology.

[17]  Akif Undar,et al.  An Evaluation of the Benefits of Pulsatile versus Nonpulsatile Perfusion during Cardiopulmonary Bypass Procedures in Pediatric and Adult Cardiac Patients , 2006, ASAIO journal.

[18]  M. Loebe,et al.  Comparison of hemodynamics in the ascending aorta between pulsatile and continuous flow left ventricular assist devices using computational fluid dynamics based on computed tomography images. , 2014, Artificial organs.

[19]  Eisuke Tatsumi,et al.  Mathematical evaluation of cardiac beat synchronization control used for a rotary blood pump , 2019, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[20]  Selim Bozkurt,et al.  IN-SILICO MODELING OF LEFT VENTRICLE TO SIMULATE DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY AND CF-LVAD SUPPORT , 2017 .

[21]  Bin Gao,et al.  The Effects of Left Ventricular Assist Device Support Level on the Biomechanical States of Aortic Valve , 2018, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[22]  B. Gao,et al.  Pulsatile Support Mode of BJUT-II Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) has Better Hemodynamic Effects on the Aorta than Constant Speed Mode: A Primary Numerical Study , 2016, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[23]  F. Boyle,et al.  Numerical prediction of the effect of aortic Left Ventricular Assist Device outflow-graft anastomosis location , 2016 .

[24]  van de Fn Frans Vosse,et al.  The influence of the non-Newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: unsteady flow in a 90° curved tube , 1999 .

[25]  F. N. van de Vosse,et al.  Arterial pulsatility under phasic left ventricular assist device support. , 2016, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[26]  A. Quarteroni,et al.  Shear stress alterations in the celiac trunk of patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device as shown by in-silico and in-vitro flow analyses. , 2017, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[27]  Marcel C M Rutten,et al.  A mathematical model to evaluate control strategies for mechanical circulatory support. , 2009, Artificial organs.

[28]  Esra Sorgüven,et al.  Effect of LVAD Outlet Graft Anastomosis Angle on the Aortic Valve, Wall, and Flow , 2012, ASAIO journal.

[29]  Hemodynamic analysis of outflow grafting positions of a ventricular assist device using closed-loop multiscale CFD simulations: Preliminary results. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  D. Mancini,et al.  Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Rapidly Evolving Alternative to Transplant. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  B. Gao,et al.  Helical Flow Component of Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) Outflow Improves Aortic Hemodynamic States , 2018, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[32]  Christof Karmonik,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support show hemodynamic alterations in the ascending aorta. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[33]  R. Opitz,et al.  A Couette viscometer for short time shearing of blood. , 1980, Biorheology.