Characterization and implications of host‐cell protein aggregates in biopharmaceutical processing

In the production of biopharmaceuticals such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and vaccines, the residual amounts of host‐cell proteins (HCPs) are among the critical quality attributes. In addition to overall HCP levels, individual HCPs may elude purification, potentially causing issues in product stability or patient safety. Such HCP persistence has been attributed mainly to biophysical interactions between individual HCPs and the product, resin media, or residual chromatin particles. Based on measurements on process streams from seven mAb processes, we have found that HCPs in aggregates, not necessarily chromatin‐derived, may play a significant role in the persistence of many HCPs. Such aggregates may also hinder accurate detection of HCPs using existing proteomics methods. The findings also highlight that certain HCPs may be difficult to remove because of their functional complementarity to the product; specifically, chaperones and other proteins involved in the unfolded protein response (UPR) are disproportionately present in the aggregates. The methods and findings described here expand our understanding of the origins and potential behavior of HCPs in cell‐based biopharmaceutical processes and may be instrumental in improving existing techniques for HCP detection and clearance.

[1]  S. Kochanek,et al.  Process- and product-related impurities in the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine , 2022, eLife.

[2]  Shinwu Jeong,et al.  Clusterin, other extracellular chaperones, and eye disease , 2021, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[3]  T. Wulff,et al.  Compartmentalized Proteomic Profiling Outlines the Crucial Role of the Classical Secretory Pathway during Recombinant Protein Production in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells , 2021, ACS omega.

[4]  G. Gaza-Bulseco,et al.  “HIGH-RISK” HOST CELL PROTEINS (HCPs): A MULTI-COMPANY COLLABORATIVE VIEW , 2020 .

[5]  F. Duffieux,et al.  Improving the analytical toolbox to investigate copurifying host cell proteins presence: N‐(4)‐(β‐acetylglucosaminyl)‐ l‐asparaginase case study , 2020, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  C. Huber,et al.  Exploring sample preparation and data evaluation strategies for enhanced identification of host cell proteins in drug products of therapeutic antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins , 2020, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[7]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  On the evolution of chaperones and cochaperones and the expansion of proteomes across the Tree of Life , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  P. Schulz,et al.  Unraveling what makes a monoclonal antibody difficult‐to‐express: From intracellular accumulation to incomplete folding and degradation via ERAD , 2020, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[9]  Yan-Hui Liu,et al.  Targeted Host Cell Protein Quantification by LC-MRM Enables Biologics Processing and Product Characterization. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  J. Bones,et al.  Identification and tracking of problematic host cell proteins removed by a synthetic, highly functionalized nonwoven media in downstream bioprocessing of monoclonal antibodies. , 2019, Journal of chromatography. A.

[11]  T. Schwab,et al.  Mass spectrometric evaluation of upstream and downstream process influences on host cell protein patterns in biopharmaceutical products , 2019, Biotechnology progress.

[12]  S. Uddin,et al.  Impact of a Heat Shock Protein Impurity on the Immunogenicity of Biotherapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies , 2019, Pharmaceutical Research.

[13]  Kelvin H. Lee,et al.  Applications of proteomic methods for CHO host cell protein characterization in biopharmaceutical manufacturing. , 2018, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[14]  Ludovic C. Gillet,et al.  Data‐independent acquisition‐based SWATH‐MS for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial , 2018, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  Christine Carapito,et al.  Dual Data-Independent Acquisition Approach Combining Global HCP Profiling and Absolute Quantification of Key Impurities during Bioprocess Development. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  I. Dikič Proteasomal and Autophagic Degradation Systems. , 2017, Annual review of biochemistry.

[17]  Lihua Huang,et al.  A Novel Sample Preparation for Shotgun Proteomics Characterization of HCPs in Antibodies. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  P. Wright,et al.  Quantitative definition and monitoring of the host cell protein proteome using iTRAQ – a study of an industrial mAb producing CHO‐S cell line , 2016, Biotechnology journal.

[19]  Ludovic C. Gillet,et al.  Mass Spectrometry Applied to Bottom-Up Proteomics: Entering the High-Throughput Era for Hypothesis Testing. , 2016, Annual review of analytical chemistry.

[20]  Michael P. Hall,et al.  Characterization of the co‐elution of host cell proteins with monoclonal antibodies during protein A purification , 2016, Biotechnology progress.

[21]  A. Farrell,et al.  Quantitative host cell protein analysis using two dimensional data independent LC-MS(E). , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[22]  Rui Nian,et al.  Non-immunospecific association of immunoglobulin G with chromatin during elution from protein A inflates host contamination, aggregate content, and antibody loss. , 2015, Journal of chromatography. A.

[23]  Abraham M. Lenhoff,et al.  Expression of difficult‐to‐remove host cell protein impurities during extended Chinese hamster ovary cell culture and their impact on continuous bioprocessing , 2015, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  MSstats: an R package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments , 2014, Bioinform..

[25]  David Robbins,et al.  A Novel Approach to Monitor Clearance of Host Cell Proteins Associated With Monoclonal Antibodies , 2014, Biotechnology progress.

[26]  Rui Nian,et al.  Nonspecific interactions of chromatin with immunoglobulin G and protein A, and their impact on purification performance. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. A.

[27]  Abraham M Lenhoff,et al.  Identification and characterization of host cell protein product‐associated impurities in monoclonal antibody bioprocessing , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[28]  Art Hewig,et al.  Comprehensive tracking of host cell proteins during monoclonal antibody purifications using mass spectrometry , 2014, mAbs.

[29]  Edward J. O'Brien,et al.  Genomic landscapes of Chinese hamster ovary cell lines as revealed by the Cricetulus griseus draft genome , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  Kelvin H. Lee,et al.  Workflow for quantitative proteomic analysis of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 using iTRAQ tags. , 2013, Methods.

[31]  Yujin E. Kim,et al.  Molecular chaperone functions in protein folding and proteostasis. , 2013, Annual review of biochemistry.

[32]  P. Gagnon,et al.  Characterization and removal of aggregates formed by nonspecific interaction of IgM monoclonal antibodies with chromatin catabolites during cell culture production. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[33]  J. Yates,et al.  Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics. , 2013, Chemical reviews.

[34]  M. Giera,et al.  Protein digestion: an overview of the available techniques and recent developments. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[35]  C. Hetz The unfolded protein response: controlling cell fate decisions under ER stress and beyond , 2012, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[36]  Ludovic C. Gillet,et al.  Targeted Data Extraction of the MS/MS Spectra Generated by Data-independent Acquisition: A New Concept for Consistent and Accurate Proteome Analysis* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[37]  R. Aebersold,et al.  mProphet: automated data processing and statistical validation for large-scale SRM experiments , 2011, Nature Methods.

[38]  Johannes Buchner,et al.  How antibodies fold. , 2010, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[39]  D. Calderwood,et al.  ASB2 targets filamins A and B to proteasomal degradation. , 2008, Blood.

[40]  Wei Li,et al.  Basement membrane dissolution and reassembly by limbal corneal epithelial cells expanded on amniotic membrane. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[41]  S. Kornfeld,et al.  Mannose 6-phosphate receptors: new twists in the tale , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[42]  R. Kaufman,et al.  The mammalian unfolded protein response. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.

[43]  L. Devi,et al.  Inflammatory Mediators Regulate Cathepsin S in Macrophages and Microglia: A Role in Attenuating Heparan Sulfate Interactions , 1999, Molecular medicine.

[44]  James Inglese,et al.  Assay Interference by Aggregation , 2017 .

[45]  Thomas Sommer,et al.  Protein quality control and elimination of protein waste: the role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[46]  M. Lehrman,et al.  Mannose-6-phosphate , 2013 .

[47]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Gene Expression Skyline: an Open Source Document Editor for Creating and Analyzing Targeted Proteomics Experiments , 2022 .