Is intraoperative frozen section analysis an efficient way to reduce positive surgical margins?

OBJECTIVES To assess the accuracy and efficiency of frozen section analysis to detect positive surgical margins (+SMs) during radical prostatectomy. METHODS In a consecutive series of 760 patients treated with radical prostatectomy from 1998 to 2002, areas suspicious for +SMs on the surface of the removed prostate were examined by frozen section analysis. In a subset of 520 patients, the surgeon's level of suspicion for +SMs was scored and recorded during radical prostatectomy. RESULTS Overall, 259 patients underwent frozen section examination. Of these, 55 patients (21%) had +SMs on permanent section examination compared with 50 (10%) of 501 patients with no frozen section analysis (P <0.005). Cancer was present in 23 (8.9%) frozen section specimens, all of which were confirmed on permanent section analysis. Frozen section examination missed 32 +SMs in 236 patients with negative frozen section results. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of frozen section analysis to identify +SMs was 42%, 100%, 100%, and 86%, respectively. However, the sensitivity of frozen section analysis was much lower (23 of 105, 22%) when analyzed for the entire population, including those who did not have frozen section analysis. Among the subset of 520 patients with the level of suspicion recorded, 79 had a +SM on permanent section examination. However, 51 (64%) of these were in patients with no suspicious area in the prostatectomy specimen. CONCLUSIONS Although the positive predictive value of frozen section analysis for +SMs is high, the sensitivity is too low to expect that a policy of routine frozen section analysis of suspicious areas will reduce the rate of +SMs substantially.

[1]  Victor Reuter,et al.  Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[2]  P. Scardino,et al.  Localized prostate cancer , 2003 .

[3]  M. Soloway,et al.  Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[4]  W. Fair,et al.  Site specific predictors of positive margins at radical prostatectomy: an argument for risk based modification of technique. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[5]  J. Epstein Incidence and significance of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 1996, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[6]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[7]  M. Litwin,et al.  Intraoperative frozen section monitoring of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[8]  M. Kattan,et al.  Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[9]  J. Melamed,et al.  Analysis of apical soft tissue margins during radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[10]  Galina Pizov,et al.  Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy , 1993, Cancer.

[11]  P. Carroll,et al.  Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy. , 2002, Urology.