A qualitative study exploring the factors influencing admission to hospital from the Emergency
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Sankalp Khanna,et al. The National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) and the 4‐hour rule: time to review the target , 2016, The Medical journal of Australia.
[2] Jon Nicholl,et al. Variation in avoidable emergency admissions: multiple case studies of emergency and urgent care systems , 2016, Journal of health services research & policy.
[3] S. Mason,et al. What has the 4-hour access standard achieved? , 2014, British journal of hospital medicine.
[4] Jon Nicholl,et al. A system-wide approach to explaining variation in potentially avoidable emergency admissions: national ecological study , 2013, BMJ quality & safety.
[5] E. Weber,et al. Implications of England's four-hour target for quality of care and resource use in the emergency department. , 2012, Annals of emergency medicine.
[6] A. Forster,et al. Mapping out the emergency department disposition decision for high-acuity patients. , 2012, Annals of emergency medicine.
[7] C. Palmer,et al. Reductions in hospital admissions and mortality rates observed after integrating emergency care: a natural experiment , 2012, BMJ Open.
[8] Papaarangi Reid,et al. Implementing performance improvement in New Zealand emergency departments: the six hour time target policy national research project protocol , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.
[9] Paul Atkinson,et al. Emergency Department Crowding: Time for Interventions and Policy Evaluations , 2012, Emergency medicine international.
[10] Simon Cooper,et al. The “4-hour target”: emergency nurses’ views , 2007, Emergency Medicine Journal.
[11] L. Sparks,et al. An admission avoidance team: its role in the Accident & Emergency department. , 1999, Accident and emergency nursing.