Spatial-frequency masking and Birdsall's theorem.

We measured the masking of a spatial 4-cycle/deg sinusoid in the presence of both random and sinusoidal masks. Subjects used a variety of detection strategies, depending on psychophysical technique and familiarity with the mask. Some strategies produce Weber's-law behavior and appear formally equivalent to identification tasks; we hypothesize that these exemplify the operation of Birdsall's theorem. Other strategies produce power-law behavior and are more like the simpler detection task. Our results suggest that criterion change (commonly uncontrolled in masking studies) can produce an unacceptably large bias in the results.

[1]  N Graham,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of spatial-frequency summation and uncertainty effects. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  G. Legge A power law for contrast discrimination , 1981, Vision Research.

[3]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Shifts in perceived size due to masking , 1983, Vision Research.

[4]  F. Campbell,et al.  Orientational selectivity of the human visual system , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  B. Julesz,et al.  Spatial-frequency masking in vision: critical bands and spread of masking. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  Dan J. Swift,et al.  Spatial frequency masking and Weber's Law , 1983, Vision Research.

[7]  R. Smith,et al.  Size Discrimination with Low Spatial Frequencies , 1982, Perception.

[8]  Theodore E. Cohn,et al.  Why luminance discrimination may be better than detection , 1981, Vision Research.

[9]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Learning in grating waveform discrimination: Specificity for orientation and spatial frequency , 1981, Vision Research.

[10]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.