Hybridised sustainability metrics for use in life cycle assessment of bio-based products: resource efficiency and circularity

The development, implementation and social acceptance of resource efficient, circular, bio-based economies require critical understanding of the whole supply chain from feedstock to end-use. Trust, transparency and traceability will be paramount. Though life cycle assessment (LCA) is a universally chosen approach to fulfil this purpose, the nature of data required and the depth of analysis lead to complex interpretations of the findings. Herein, a new set of hybridised, first-line sustainability indicators, drawn from the principles of green chemistry and resource (material and energy) circularity, are reported. These flexible, potentially stand-alone metrics are demonstrated via application to an exemplary comparative LCA, incorporating the hybridised indicators including hazardous chemical use, waste generated, resource circularity and energy efficiency, from the “gate-to-gate” stages for the bio-based case studies and their petro-derived commercial counterparts. These metrics were observed to quantify critical new information relevant to our transition to a circular economy, bridging significant gaps in contemporary environmental impact assessment methodologies. Appropriate additional evaluations that examine the performance of metrics, when the embedded resource efficiency and circularity strategies are omitted, have also been undertaken and reported. The data drawn from employing these methods are crucial to inform and encourage operational optimisation, transparency in sustainability reporting and practices to a significant number of value-chain actors including manufacturers, policy makers and consumers.

[1]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Ex-ante life cycle assessment of polymer nanocomposites using organo-modified layered double hydroxides for potential application in agricultural films , 2014 .

[2]  David A. Glassner,et al.  Applications of life cycle assessment to NatureWorks polylactide (PLA) production , 2003 .

[3]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Consistent quantification of climate impacts due to biogenic carbon storage across a range of bio-product systems , 2013 .

[4]  Bulim Choi,et al.  Carbon Footprint of Packaging Films Made from LDPE, PLA, and PLA/PBAT Blends in South Korea , 2018, Sustainability.

[5]  Riccardo Basosi,et al.  LCA of 1,4-Butanediol Produced via Direct Fermentation of Sugars from Wheat Straw Feedstock within a Territorial Biorefinery , 2016, Materials.

[6]  Ramani Narayan,et al.  Assessment of the environmental profile of PLA, PET and PS clamshell containers using LCA methodology , 2009 .

[7]  John D. Hayler,et al.  CHEM21 selection guide of classical- and less classical-solvents , 2016 .

[8]  Michael J. Lathuillière,et al.  The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE) , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  Seung Ju Han,et al.  Hydrogenation of succinic acid to 1,4-butanediol over Re–Ru bimetallic catalysts supported on mesoporous carbon , 2015 .

[10]  James H. Clark,et al.  Towards a holistic approach to metrics for the 21st century pharmaceutical industry , 2015 .

[11]  Daniela Thrän,et al.  Cascade use indicators for selected biopolymers: Are we aiming for the right solutions in the design for recycling of bio-based polymers? , 2017, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[12]  Roger A. Sheldon,et al.  The E factor 25 years on: the rise of green chemistry and sustainability , 2017 .

[13]  Michael A. Gonzalez,et al.  Sustainability Indicators for Chemical Processes: I. Taxonomy , 2012 .

[14]  Jean-Paul Hettelingh,et al.  Country-dependent Characterisation Factors for Acidification and Terrestrial Eutrophication Based on Accumulated Exceedance as an Impact Category Indicator (14 pp) , 2006 .

[15]  K. Lokesh,et al.  Bridging the Gaps for a ‘Circular’ Bioeconomy: Selection Criteria, Bio-Based Value Chain and Stakeholder Mapping , 2018 .

[16]  J. Clark,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of wheat straw based alkyl polyglucosides produced using novel chemical approaches , 2017 .

[17]  Susan Selke,et al.  An overview of polylactides as packaging materials. , 2004, Macromolecular bioscience.

[18]  Vincenzo Piemonte,et al.  Bioplastic Wastes: The Best Final Disposition for Energy Saving , 2011 .