The age of reason for FDG PET image-derived indices
暂无分享,去创建一个
Florent Tixier | Dimitris Visvikis | Mathieu Hatt | Catherine Cheze Le Rest | M. Hatt | F. Tixier | D. Visvikis | C. Cheze Le Rest
[1] Robert Jeraj,et al. Impact of the Definition of Peak Standardized Uptake Value on Quantification of Treatment Response , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[2] Maximilien Vermandel,et al. Pre-therapy 18F-FDG PET quantitative parameters help in predicting the response to radioimmunotherapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[3] Howard Y. Chang,et al. Decoding global gene expression programs in liver cancer by noninvasive imaging , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.
[4] Adriaan A. Lammertsma,et al. Effects of ROI definition and reconstruction method on quantitative outcome and applicability in a response monitoring trial , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[5] Xiaoyuan Chen,et al. Molecular imaging in cancer treatment , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[6] Kyung Soo Lee,et al. Volume-Based Parameter of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Prediction of Therapeutic Response and Prognostic Implications , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[7] Florent Tixier,et al. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET image-based parameters in oesophageal cancer and impact of tumour delineation methodology , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[8] R. Wahl,et al. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[9] Wolfgang A Weber,et al. Assessing Tumor Response to Therapy , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[10] Y. D'Asseler,et al. Standardized added metabolic activity (SAM): a partial volume independent marker of total lesion glycolysis in liver metastases , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[11] Dimitris Visvikis,et al. Reproducibility of 18F-FDG and 3′-Deoxy-3′-18F-Fluorothymidine PET Tumor Volume Measurements , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[12] M. Hatt,et al. Intratumor Heterogeneity Characterized by Textural Features on Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images Predicts Response to Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[13] I. Buvat,et al. Comparative Assessment of Methods for Estimating Tumor Volume and Standardized Uptake Value in 18F-FDG PET , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[14] Habib Zaidi,et al. PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[15] Issam El-Naqa,et al. Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes , 2009, Pattern Recognit..
[16] Dimitris Visvikis,et al. PET functional volume delineation: a robustness and repeatability study , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[17] John L. Humm,et al. Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging. The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis. , 1999, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.
[18] C. Rübe,et al. Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[19] Dimitris Visvikis,et al. Baseline 18F-FDG PET image-derived parameters for therapy response prediction in oesophageal cancer , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.