What are critical features of science curriculum materials that impact student and teacher outcomes
暂无分享,去创建一个
Christian D. Schunn | Susan McKenney | Natalie Pareja Roblin | C. Schunn | S. McKenney | N. P. Roblin
[1] Lawrence P. Gallagher,et al. Impact of project-based curriculum materials on student learning in science: Results of a randomized controlled trial , 2015 .
[2] David Fortus,et al. Assessing the role of curriculum coherence in student learning about energy , 2015 .
[3] Bethany R. Smith,et al. Using Systematic Instruction and Graphic Organizers to Teach Science Concepts to Students With Autism Spectrum Disorders and Intellectual Disability , 2013 .
[4] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Synergy Between Teacher Practices and Curricular Scaffolds to Support Students in Using Domain-Specific and Domain-General Knowledge in Writing Arguments to Explain Phenomena , 2009 .
[5] Leema K. Berland,et al. Making sense of argumentation and explanation , 2009 .
[6] J. Krajcik,et al. The Benefits and Limitations of Educative Curriculum Materials , 2017 .
[7] T. Guskey. Professional Development and Teacher Change , 2002 .
[8] D. Ball,et al. Reform by the Book: What Is—or Might Be—the Role of Curriculum Materials in Teacher Learning and Instructional Reform? , 1996 .
[9] David Fortus,et al. Curriculum Materials for Next Generation Science Standards: What the Science Education Research Community Can Do , 2015 .
[10] Ashok K. Goel,et al. Conceptual representations for transfer: A case study tracing back and looking forward , 2013 .
[11] James C. Lester,et al. Designing game-based learning environments for elementary science education: A narrative-centered learning perspective , 2014, Inf. Sci..
[12] Roberto Agodini,et al. The influence of curriculum material design on opportunities for student learning , 2014 .
[13] E. Quertemont,et al. How to Statistically Show the Absence of an Effect , 2011 .
[14] Norman G. Lederman,et al. Nature of Science, Scientific Inquiry, and Socio-Scientific Issues Arising from Genetics: A Pathway to Developing a Scientifically Literate Citizenry , 2014 .
[15] Ronald D. Anderson,et al. Changing teachers' practice: curriculum materials and science education reform in the USA , 2002 .
[16] William L. Romine,et al. Learning Biology Through Innovative Curricula: A Comparison of Game- and Nongame-Based Approaches , 2015 .
[17] Ngss Lead States. Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .
[18] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials , 2006 .
[19] Shawn Y. Stevens,et al. Developing a Hypothetical Multi-Dimensional Learning Progression for the Nature of Matter. , 2009 .
[20] B. Means,et al. The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 2013, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.
[21] Rebecca Schneider,et al. Opportunities for Teacher Learning During Enactment of Inquiry Science Curriculum Materials: Exploring the Potential for Teacher Educative Materials , 2013 .
[22] Pam Grossman,et al. Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teachers? ☆ , 2008 .
[23] Soonhye Park,et al. Is Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Necessary for Reformed Science Teaching?: Evidence from an Empirical Study , 2011 .
[24] Barbara A. Crawford,et al. Teaching science as a cultural way of knowing: merging authentic inquiry, nature of science, and multicultural strategies , 2011 .
[25] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Planning Instruction to Meet the Intent of the Next Generation Science Standards , 2014 .
[26] M. Hannafin,et al. A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition , 2013, Educational psychologist.
[27] Cathy P. Lachapelle,et al. Engineering is Elementary: An Evaluation of Years 4 through 6 Field Testing , 2011 .
[28] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Examining the effect of teachers' adaptations of a middle school science inquiry-oriented curriculum unit on student learning , 2011 .
[29] Olejnik,et al. Measures of Effect Size for Comparative Studies: Applications, Interpretations, and Limitations. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.
[30] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Investigating Teacher Learning Supports in High School Biology Curricular Programs to Inform the Design of Educative Curriculum Materials , 2009 .
[31] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Enacting Reform-Based Science Materials: The Range of Teacher Enactments in Reform Classrooms , 2005 .
[32] J. Krajcik,et al. Curriculum Coherence and Learning Progressions , 2012 .
[33] B. Crawford,et al. Multicultural Inquiry Toward Demystifying Scientific Culture and Learning Science , 2015 .
[34] EarthLabs: Supporting Teacher Professional Development to Facilitate Effective Teaching of Climate Science , 2014 .
[35] Janet F. Carlson,et al. An Efficacy Trial of Research-Based Curriculum Materials With Curriculum-Based Professional Development , 2015 .
[36] J. Krajcik,et al. Supporting Science Teacher Learning: The Role of Educative Curriculum Materials , 2002 .
[37] Douglas B. Clark,et al. Bilingual language supports in online science inquiry environments , 2012, Comput. Educ..
[38] J. Krajcik,et al. Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning , 2005 .
[39] J. Remillard. Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula , 2005 .
[40] J. Frederiksen,et al. Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .
[41] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform , 2004 .
[42] Janine T. Remillard,et al. The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials , 2009 .
[43] Laurie Brantley-Dias,et al. Practicing What We Teach: A Self-Study in Implementing an Inquiry-Based Curriculum in a Middle Grades Classroom , 2011 .
[44] Deborah Loewenberg Ball,et al. Instruction, Capacity, and Improvement , 1999 .
[45] Brian R. Belland,et al. A Pilot Meta-Analysis of Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..
[46] P. Lachenbruch. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .
[47] Jody Clarke,et al. Design for Scalability: A Case Study of the River City Curriculum , 2009 .
[48] Laura M. Desimone,et al. What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .
[49] Gina N. Cervetti,et al. The effects of educative curriculum materials on teachers' Use of instructional strategies for English language learners in science and on student learning , 2015 .
[50] Kurt Squire,et al. Role playing games for scientific citizenship , 2012 .
[51] V. Akerson,et al. What Third-Grade Students of Differing Ability Levels Learn about Nature of Science after a Year of Instruction , 2014 .
[52] Jo Ellen Roseman,et al. How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review , 2002 .
[53] Elizabeth A. Davis,et al. Learning to critique and adapt science curriculum materials: Examining the development of preservice elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge , 2012 .
[54] Kathryn N. Hayes,et al. Testing Predictors of Instructional Practice in Elementary Science Education: The Significant Role of Accountability , 2016 .
[55] B. Reiser,et al. Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners , 2009 .
[56] Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al. Teachers’ use of educative curriculum materials to engage students in science practices , 2016 .
[57] Martin Reisslein,et al. Learner Achievement and Attitudes under Different Paces of Transitioning to Independent Problem Solving , 2007 .
[58] Brian J. Reiser,et al. Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.
[59] L. Shulman. Those who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 2013 .
[60] Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al. Justifying Predictions: Connecting Use of Educative Curriculum Materials to Students’ Engagement in Science Argumentation , 2017 .
[61] L. Hoffmann,et al. An intervention study to enhance girls' interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes , 2002 .
[62] Katherine L. McNeill,et al. An exploration of teacher learning from an educative reform‐oriented science curriculum: Case studies of teacher curriculum use , 2017 .
[63] Roy D. Pea,et al. The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.
[64] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Achieving standards in urban systemic reform: An example of a sixth grade project‐based science curriculum , 2004 .
[65] Janet F. Carlson,et al. Developing and Evaluating an Eighth Grade Curriculum Unit That Links Foundational Chemistry to Biological Growth: Designing Professional Development to Support Teaching. , 2013 .
[66] C. Coburn,et al. Rethinking Scale: Moving Beyond Numbers to Deep and Lasting Change , 2003 .
[67] Y. Wyner. The Impact of a Novel Curriculum on Secondary Biology Teachers’ Dispositions Toward Using Authentic Data and Media in Their Human Impact and Ecology Lessons , 2013 .
[68] Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al. Examining student work for evidence of teacher uptake of educative curriculum materials , 2015 .
[69] E. Skaalvik,et al. Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations , 2010 .
[70] J. Donna,et al. Developing Elementary Preservice Teacher Subject Matter Knowledge Through the Use of Educative Science Curriculum Materials , 2017 .
[71] P. David Pearson,et al. The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms , 2012 .