Efficacy and effectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine in preventing Ebola virus disease: final results from the Guinea ring vaccination, open-label, cluster-randomised trial (Ebola Ça Suffit!)

Summary Background rVSV-ZEBOV is a recombinant, replication competent vesicular stomatitis virus-based candidate vaccine expressing a surface glycoprotein of Zaire Ebolavirus. We tested the effect of rVSV-ZEBOV in preventing Ebola virus disease in contacts and contacts of contacts of recently confirmed cases in Guinea, west Africa. Methods We did an open-label, cluster-randomised ring vaccination trial (Ebola ça Suffit!) in the communities of Conakry and eight surrounding prefectures in the Basse-Guinée region of Guinea, and in Tomkolili and Bombali in Sierra Leone. We assessed the efficacy of a single intramuscular dose of rVSV-ZEBOV (2×107 plaque-forming units administered in the deltoid muscle) in the prevention of laboratory confirmed Ebola virus disease. After confirmation of a case of Ebola virus disease, we definitively enumerated on a list a ring (cluster) of all their contacts and contacts of contacts including named contacts and contacts of contacts who were absent at the time of the trial team visit. The list was archived, then we randomly assigned clusters (1:1) to either immediate vaccination or delayed vaccination (21 days later) of all eligible individuals (eg, those aged ≥18 years and not pregnant, breastfeeding, or severely ill). An independent statistician generated the assignment sequence using block randomisation with randomly varying blocks, stratified by location (urban vs rural) and size of rings (≤20 individuals vs >20 individuals). Ebola response teams and laboratory workers were unaware of assignments. After a recommendation by an independent data and safety monitoring board, randomisation was stopped and immediate vaccination was also offered to children aged 6–17 years and all identified rings. The prespecified primary outcome was a laboratory confirmed case of Ebola virus disease with onset 10 days or more from randomisation. The primary analysis compared the incidence of Ebola virus disease in eligible and vaccinated individuals assigned to immediate vaccination versus eligible contacts and contacts of contacts assigned to delayed vaccination. This trial is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, number PACTR201503001057193. Findings In the randomised part of the trial we identified 4539 contacts and contacts of contacts in 51 clusters randomly assigned to immediate vaccination (of whom 3232 were eligible, 2151 consented, and 2119 were immediately vaccinated) and 4557 contacts and contacts of contacts in 47 clusters randomly assigned to delayed vaccination (of whom 3096 were eligible, 2539 consented, and 2041 were vaccinated 21 days after randomisation). No cases of Ebola virus disease occurred 10 days or more after randomisation among randomly assigned contacts and contacts of contacts vaccinated in immediate clusters versus 16 cases (7 clusters affected) among all eligible individuals in delayed clusters. Vaccine efficacy was 100% (95% CI 68·9–100·0, p=0·0045), and the calculated intraclass correlation coefficient was 0·035. Additionally, we defined 19 non-randomised clusters in which we enumerated 2745 contacts and contacts of contacts, 2006 of whom were eligible and 1677 were immediately vaccinated, including 194 children. The evidence from all 117 clusters showed that no cases of Ebola virus disease occurred 10 days or more after randomisation among all immediately vaccinated contacts and contacts of contacts versus 23 cases (11 clusters affected) among all eligible contacts and contacts of contacts in delayed plus all eligible contacts and contacts of contacts never vaccinated in immediate clusters. The estimated vaccine efficacy here was 100% (95% CI 79·3–100·0, p=0·0033). 52% of contacts and contacts of contacts assigned to immediate vaccination and in non-randomised clusters received the vaccine immediately; vaccination protected both vaccinated and unvaccinated people in those clusters. 5837 individuals in total received the vaccine (5643 adults and 194 children), and all vaccinees were followed up for 84 days. 3149 (53·9%) of 5837 individuals reported at least one adverse event in the 14 days after vaccination; these were typically mild (87·5% of all 7211 adverse events). Headache (1832 [25·4%]), fatigue (1361 [18·9%]), and muscle pain (942 [13·1%]) were the most commonly reported adverse events in this period across all age groups. 80 serious adverse events were identified, of which two were judged to be related to vaccination (one febrile reaction and one anaphylaxis) and one possibly related (influenza-like illness); all three recovered without sequelae. Interpretation The results add weight to the interim assessment that rVSV-ZEBOV offers substantial protection against Ebola virus disease, with no cases among vaccinated individuals from day 10 after vaccination in both randomised and non-randomised clusters. Funding WHO, UK Wellcome Trust, the UK Government through the Department of International Development, Médecins Sans Frontières, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (through the Research Council of Norway's GLOBVAC programme), and the Canadian Government (through the Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, International Development Research Centre and Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development).

[1]  B. Cowling,et al.  Changes in the primary outcome in Ebola vaccine trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[2]  X. Qiu,et al.  Immunization with vesicular stomatitis virus vaccine expressing the Ebola glycoprotein provides sustained long-term protection in rodents , 2014, Vaccine.

[3]  Heinz Feldmann,et al.  Live attenuated recombinant vaccine protects nonhuman primates against Ebola and Marburg viruses , 2005, Nature Medicine.

[4]  F. Fenner Smallpox and its eradication , 1988 .

[5]  L. Fernando,et al.  Assessment of a vesicular stomatitis virus-based vaccine by use of the mouse model of Ebola virus hemorrhagic fever. , 2007, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[6]  W. Team,et al.  Ebola Virus Disease among Male and Female Persons in West Africa , 2016 .

[7]  Steven J M Jones,et al.  Vesicular stomatitis virus-based vaccines protect nonhuman primates against aerosol challenge with Ebola and Marburg viruses. , 2008, Vaccine.

[8]  W. J. Ramsey,et al.  A Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Ebola Vaccine , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  J. Strong,et al.  VSV-EBOV rapidly protects macaques against infection with the 2014/15 Ebola virus outbreak strain , 2015, Science.

[10]  P. Krause Interim results from a phase 3 Ebola vaccine study in Guinea , 2015, The Lancet.

[11]  M. Egger,et al.  Changes in the primary outcome in Ebola vaccine trial – Authors' reply , 2016, The Lancet.

[12]  Steven J M Jones,et al.  Vesicular Stomatitis Virus-Based Ebola Vaccine Is Well-Tolerated and Protects Immunocompromised Nonhuman Primates , 2008, PLoS pathogens.

[13]  Heinz Feldmann,et al.  Single-Injection Vaccine Protects Nonhuman Primates against Infection with Marburg Virus and Three Species of Ebola Virus , 2009, Journal of Virology.

[14]  M. Egger,et al.  Effi cacy and eff ectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine expressing Ebola surface glycoprotein : interim results from the Guinea ring vaccination cluster-randomised trial , 2015 .

[15]  Wes Hinsley,et al.  Ebola Virus Disease among Male and Female Persons in West Africa. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  H. Feldmann,et al.  Ebola virus vaccines: an overview of current approaches , 2014, Expert review of vaccines.

[17]  Christopher Dye,et al.  Ebola vaccine--an urgent international priority. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  W. Team Ebola virus disease among children in West Africa. , 2015 .

[19]  John-Arne Røttingen,et al.  The ring vaccination trial: a novel cluster randomised controlled trial design to evaluate vaccine efficacy and effectiveness during outbreaks, with special reference to Ebola , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  M. Altfeld,et al.  Phase 1 Trials of rVSV Ebola Vaccine in Africa and Europe. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  X. Qiu,et al.  Mucosal Immunization of Cynomolgus Macaques with the VSVΔG/ZEBOVGP Vaccine Stimulates Strong Ebola GP-Specific Immune Responses , 2009, PloS one.

[22]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of the Ebola epidemic in Guinea and implications for vaccination and disease elimination: a computational modeling analysis , 2016, BMC Medicine.

[23]  Lisa M. Brosseau,et al.  Transmission of Ebola Viruses: What We Know and What We Do Not Know , 2015, mBio.

[24]  H. Feldmann,et al.  Safety of Recombinant VSV–Ebola Virus Vaccine Vector in Pigs , 2015, Emerging infectious diseases.

[25]  John-Arne Røttingen,et al.  Efficacy and effectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine expressing Ebola surface glycoprotein: interim results from the Guinea ring vaccination cluster-randomised trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[26]  Fredson Kuti-George,et al.  Contact Tracing during an Outbreak of Ebola Virus Disease in the Western Area Districts of Sierra Leone: Lessons for Future Ebola Outbreak Response , 2016, Front. Public Health.

[27]  H. Feldmann,et al.  Cross-Protection against Marburg Virus Strains by Using a Live, Attenuated Recombinant Vaccine , 2006, Journal of Virology.

[28]  G. Kobinger,et al.  Efficacy of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus-Ebola Virus Postexposure Treatment in Rhesus Macaques Infected With Ebola Virus Makona. , 2016, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[29]  L. Fernando,et al.  Effective Post-Exposure Treatment of Ebola Infection , 2007, PLoS pathogens.