Mutational Impacts on the N and C Terminal Domains of the MUC5B Protein: A Transcriptomics and Structural Biology Study

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) involves various epithelial tumors historically linked with poor prognosis because of its aggressive sickness course, delayed diagnosis, and limited efficacy of typical chemotherapy in its advanced stages. In-depth molecular profiling has exposed a varied scenery of genomic alterations as CCA’s oncogenic drivers. Previous studies have mainly focused on commonly occurring TP53 and KRAS alterations, but there is limited research conducted to explore other vital genes involved in CCA. We retrieved data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to hunt for additional CCA targets and plotted a mutational landscape, identifying key genes and their frequently expressed variants. Next, we performed a survival analysis for all of the top genes to shortlist the ones with better significance. Among those genes, we observed that MUC5B has the most significant p-value of 0.0061. Finally, we chose two missense mutations at different positions in the vicinity of MUC5B N and C terminal domains. These mutations were further subjected to molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, which revealed noticeable impacts on the protein structure. Our study not only reveals one of the highly mutated genes with enhanced significance in CCA but also gives insights into the influence of its variants. We believe these findings are a good asset for understanding CCA from genomics and structural biology perspectives.

[1]  Dongqing Wei,et al.  Discovering potent inhibitors against the Mpro of the SARS-CoV-2. A medicinal chemistry approach , 2021, Computers in Biology and Medicine.

[2]  M. Hashemi,et al.  Investigating the Relationship Between the Expression Level of Mucin Gene Cluster (MUC2, MUC5A, and MUC5B) and Clinicopathological Characterization of Colorectal Cancer , 2021, Galen medical journal.

[3]  Hui Meng,et al.  A MUCINs expression signature impacts overall survival in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma , 2021, Cancer medicine.

[4]  Oriol Vinyals,et al.  Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold , 2021, Nature.

[5]  He Zhou,et al.  Mucin 4 mutation is associated with tumor mutation burden and promotes antitumor immunity in colon cancer patients , 2021, Aging.

[6]  Cheng-Dong Li,et al.  Bringing Structural Implications and Deep Learning-Based Drug Identification for KRAS Mutants , 2021, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[7]  Dongqing Wei,et al.  Globally ncRNAs Expression Profiling of TNBC and Screening of Functional lncRNA , 2021, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.

[8]  G. Gores,et al.  Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management , 2020, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.

[9]  S. Marrink,et al.  Coupling Coarse-Grained to Fine-Grained Models via Hamiltonian Replica Exchange , 2020, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[10]  Dongqing Wei,et al.  Robust Biomarker Screening Using Spares Learning Approach for Liver Cancer Prognosis , 2020, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.

[11]  Dongqing Wei,et al.  Structural Dynamics Behind Clinical Mutants of PncA-Asp12Ala, Pro54Leu, and His57Pro of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Associated With Pyrazinamide Resistance , 2019, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[12]  P. Rodrigues,et al.  The jigsaw of dual hepatocellular–intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tumours , 2019, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.

[13]  G. Poston,et al.  Increased multimodality treatment options has improved survival for Hepatocellular carcinoma but poor survival for biliary tract cancers remains unchanged. , 2019, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[14]  C. la Vecchia,et al.  Global trends in mortality from intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. , 2019, Journal of hepatology.

[15]  Dongqing Wei,et al.  Computational Screening and Analysis of Lung Cancer Related Non-Synonymous Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms on the Human Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Gene , 2019, Molecules.

[16]  Yassen Assenov,et al.  Maftools: efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer , 2018, Genome research.

[17]  Youben Fan,et al.  Cell adhesion-related gene somatic mutations are enriched in aggressive papillary thyroid microcarcinomas , 2018, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[18]  Kathryn J Fowler,et al.  cHCC‐CCA: Consensus terminology for primary liver carcinomas with both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentation , 2018, Hepatology.

[19]  Adrian V. Lee,et al.  An Integrated TCGA Pan-Cancer Clinical Data Resource to Drive High-Quality Survival Outcome Analytics , 2018, Cell.

[20]  G. Gores,et al.  Cholangiocarcinoma — evolving concepts and therapeutic strategies , 2018, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Gianluca Bontempi,et al.  TCGAbiolinks: an R/Bioconductor package for integrative analysis of TCGA data , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  D. Gouma,et al.  Recurrence Rate and Pattern of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma after Curative Intent Resection. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[23]  P. Lindnér,et al.  The Impact of Changed Strategies for Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma in This Millenium , 2015, HPB surgery : a world journal of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary surgery.

[24]  G. Spolverato,et al.  Management and Outcomes of Patients with Recurrent Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Following Previous Curative-Intent Surgical Resection , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[25]  Itzhak Avital,et al.  Genomic and genetic characterization of cholangiocarcinoma identifies therapeutic targets for tyrosine kinase inhibitors. , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[26]  David Baker,et al.  Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  Krishna Sekar,et al.  Ramachandran plot on the web , 2002, Bioinform..

[28]  Y. Kim,et al.  Diversity of mucin genes, structure, function, and expression. , 1995, Gastroenterology.

[29]  G. Niehans,et al.  Expression cloning of gastric mucin complementary DNA and localization of mucin gene expression. , 1995, Gastroenterology.

[30]  P. Kollman,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Solvated Biomolecular Systems: The Particle Mesh Ewald Method Leads to Stable Trajectories of DNA, RNA, and Proteins , 1995 .

[31]  S. Gendler,et al.  Epithelial mucin genes. , 1995, Annual review of physiology.

[32]  N. Porchet,et al.  Degenerate 87-base-pair tandem repeats create hydrophilic/hydrophobic alternating domains in human mucin peptides mapped to 11p15. , 1993, The Biochemical journal.