Foreign Body Reaction Associated With Artificial LARS Ligaments: A Retrieval Study

Background: Artificial ligaments have been developed and used in the treatment of ligamentous injuries since the 1970s. The early generation of artificial ligaments showed promising short-term results but resulted in high rates of rupture and inflammatory reaction in the surrounding tissues. Purpose: To determine whether the use of Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS) ligaments is associated with the development of intra-articular foreign body reaction. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: LARS ligaments were explanted from 15 patients under 6 consultant orthopaedic surgeons at 8 surgical centers. Of these, 14 explanted samples were sent for macroscopic and histological analysis, with the 1 remaining sample sent for scanning electron microscopy, to assess for inflammatory change as well as the degree of fibrous tissue ingrowth. Results: We observed a foreign body reaction in 10 of 14 explanted LARS ligaments. Seven samples demonstrated fibrous tissue ingrowth, with 5 producing only focal or incomplete ingrowth. The 2 samples with extensive fibrous coverage were completely free of any foreign body reaction, while all 5 remaining samples with only focal or partial fibrous ingrowth were associated with at least some degree of harmful immune response. Conclusion: The LARS ligament is still associated with a clinically significant degree of foreign body reaction despite the LARS Company’s efforts to reduce complications through improved design. The development and completion of fibrous tissue ingrowth may work to reduce the occurrence of a foreign body reaction.

[1]  D. Iliadis,et al.  LARS Artificial Ligament Versus ABC Purely Polyester Ligament for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2016, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[2]  Tianwu Chen,et al.  Status and headway of the clinical application of artificial ligaments , 2015, Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology.

[3]  L. Salmon,et al.  Revision ACL reconstruction after use of the LARS ligament: A case series , 2012 .

[4]  Leo A. Pinczewski,et al.  Disabling Synovitis Associated With LARS Artificial Ligament Use in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  Alberto Ventura,et al.  Synthetic grafts for anterior cruciate ligament rupture: 19-year outcome study. , 2010, The Knee.

[6]  Alberto Ventura,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with synthetic grafts. A review of literature , 2010, International Orthopaedics.

[7]  K. Trieb,et al.  In vivo and in vitro Cellular Ingrowthinto a New Generation of Artificial Ligaments , 2004, European Surgical Research.

[8]  N. Duval,et al.  A new generation of artificial ligaments in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Two-year follow-up of a randomised trial. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  R. Guidoin,et al.  Analysis of retrieved polymer fiber based replacements for the ACL. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[10]  L. Claes,et al.  Biological response to ligament wear particles. , 1995, Journal of applied biomaterials : an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials.