Culturally heterogeneous vs. culturally homogeneous groups in distributed group support systems: effects on group process and consensus

As global virtual teams become more common, the need to better understand how groups composed of individuals from different cultural backgrounds perform has never been more pressing. This study compares groups from the same cultural background with groups from varied cultural backgrounds when they used two different communication media (face-to-face and an asynchronous conferencing system). Data was collected on 46 groups, which included a total of 268 subjects representing 39 countries. Research questions regarding group process and consensus were addressed specifically as they relate to cross-cultural group work. The results of this study suggest that distributed asynchronous GSS may be effectively used by mixed cultural groups facing a value-based cognitive conflict (negotiation) task.

[1]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  An empirical study of task type and communication medium in GDSS , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  Kwok-Kee Wei,et al.  Effects of support and task type on group decision outcome: A study using SAMM , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[3]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys. , 1988 .

[4]  K. Wei,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Task Dimension of Group Support System , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[5]  Kenneth A. Kozar,et al.  The Impact of Computer Alienation on Information Technology INvestment Decisions: An Exploratory Cross-National Analysis , 1995, MIS Q..

[6]  V. Shackleton,et al.  Work-Related Values of Managers , 1990 .

[7]  Kamal Fatehi,et al.  International Management: A Cross Cultural and Functional Perspective , 1995 .

[8]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Reducing Status Effects with Computer-Mediated Communication: Evidence from Two Distinct National Cultures , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  GSS meeting productivity and participation equity: a US and Mexico cross-cultural field study , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some societies invent more than others , 1992 .

[11]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[12]  Sajda Qureshi,et al.  Meeting and Working on an Electronic Social Space: Behavioural Considerations and Implications for Cross-cultural End User Computing , 1995 .

[13]  William E. Halal The Network Nation: Human communication via computer : Starr Roxanne Hiltz and Murray Turoff, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993 revised edition, $24.95, 557 pp. , 1994 .

[14]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[15]  P. McLeod,et al.  Effects of Ethnic Group Cultural Differences on Cooperative and Competitive Behavior On a Group Task , 1991 .

[16]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Consensus and Perceived Satisfaction Levels: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of GSS and Non-GSS Outcomes within and between the United States and Mexico , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  S. R. Hiltz The Network Nation , 1978 .

[18]  K. S. Raman,et al.  The Effect of GDSS and Elected Leadership on Small Group Meetings , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An integrated framework for the study of group decision support systems , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Group decision support systems: the cultural factor , 1989, ICIS '89.

[21]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Computer Support for Group Versus Individual Decisions , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[22]  E. B. Tylor,et al.  Primitive Culture: Researches Into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom , 1974 .

[23]  B. Daily,et al.  The influence of group decision support systems on contribution and commitment levels in multicultural and culturally homogeneous decision-making groups , 1998 .

[24]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Culture: a fourth dimension of group support systems , 1994, CACM.

[25]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  Technology, culture and persuasiveness: a study of choice-shifts in group settings , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  Poppy Lauretta McLeod,et al.  An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[27]  E. B. Tylor,et al.  Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, language, art, and custom, Vol 1 (7th ed.). , 1924 .

[28]  I. Vertinsky,et al.  Does Culture Matter? A Cross-Cultural Study of Executives’ Choice, Decisiveness, and Risk Adjustment in International Marketing , 1988 .

[29]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[30]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  Exploring the effects of some display and task factors on GSS user groups , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[31]  M. Rokeach The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[32]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The implications of group support technologies: an evaluation of the emipirical research , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track.

[33]  S. Schwartz Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values , 1994 .

[34]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[35]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and computer-supported cooperative work , 1995 .

[36]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[37]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[38]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[39]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Extensions to media richness theory: a test of the task-media fit hypothesis , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[40]  I. Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[41]  Alfred G. Meyer,et al.  Culture, a critical review of concepts and definitions , 1953 .

[42]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[43]  E. B. Tylor,et al.  Primitive culture : researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, language, art and custom. [Volume 1] / by Edward B. Tylor,... , 1873 .

[44]  H. Triandis,et al.  Review of Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1982 .

[45]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  Culture and interpersonal communication , 1988 .

[47]  Steven R. Ash,et al.  The effects of a group decision support system on culturally diverse and culturally homogeneous group decision making , 1996, Inf. Manag..