Robust DNA Methylation in the Clonal Raider Ant Brain

Social insects are promising model systems for epigenetics due to their immense morphological and behavioral plasticity. Reports that DNA methylation differs between the queen and worker castes in social insects [1-4] have implied a role for DNA methylation in regulating division of labor. To better understand the function of DNA methylation in social insects, we performed whole-genome bisulfite sequencing on brains of the clonal raider ant Cerapachys biroi, whose colonies alternate between reproductive (queen-like) and brood care (worker-like) phases [5]. Many cytosines were methylated in all replicates (on average 29.5% of the methylated cytosines in a given replicate), indicating that a large proportion of the C. biroi brain methylome is robust. Robust DNA methylation occurred preferentially in exonic CpGs of highly and stably expressed genes involved in core functions. Our analyses did not detect any differences in DNA methylation between the queen-like and worker-like phases, suggesting that DNA methylation is not associated with changes in reproduction and behavior in C. biroi. Finally, many cytosines were methylated in one sample only, due to either biological or experimental variation. By applying the statistical methods used in previous studies [1-4, 6] to our data, we show that such sample-specific DNA methylation may underlie the previous findings of queen- and worker-specific methylation. We argue that there is currently no evidence that genome-wide variation in DNA methylation is associated with the queen and worker castes in social insects, and we call for a more careful interpretation of the available data.

[1]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[2]  R. Kucharski,et al.  Nutritional Control of Reproductive Status in Honeybees via DNA Methylation , 2008, Science.

[3]  Thomas R. Gingeras,et al.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner , 2013, Bioinform..

[4]  R. A. Drewell,et al.  The dynamic DNA methylation cycle from egg to sperm in the honey bee Apis mellifera , 2014, Development.

[5]  Amy L. Toth,et al.  Epigenetics in Social Insects: A New Direction for Understanding the Evolution of Castes , 2012, Genetics research international.

[6]  Current Biology , 2012, Current Biology.

[7]  R. Bonasio.  The expanding epigenetic landscape of non-model organisms , 2015, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[8]  F. Ravary,et al.  The reproductive cycle of thelytokous colonies of Cerapachys biroi Forel (Formicidae, Cerapachyinae) , 2002, Insectes Sociaux.

[9]  Felix Krueger,et al.  Molecular signatures of plastic phenotypes in two eusocial insect species with simple societies , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  A. Isles.  Neural and behavioral epigenetics; what it is, and what is hype , 2015, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[11]  F. Ravary,et al.  Brood stimulation controls the phasic reproductive cycle of the parthenogenetic ant Cerapachys biroi , 2006, Insectes Sociaux.

[12]  M. Goodisman,et al.  DNA methylation in insects: on the brink of the epigenomic era , 2011, Insect molecular biology.

[13]  Soojin V Yi,et al.  Epigenetic inheritance and genome regulation: is DNA methylation linked to ploidy in haplodiploid insects? , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  A. Toth,et al.  Honey bee sociogenomics: a genome-scale perspective on bee social behavior and health , 2013, Apidologie.

[15]  R. Maleszka.  The social honey bee in biomedical research: realities and expectations , 2014 .

[16]  Soojin V Yi,et al.  The function of intragenic DNA methylation: insights from insect epigenomes. , 2013, Integrative and comparative biology.

[17]  D. Reinberg,et al.  DNA methylation in social insects: how epigenetics can control behavior and longevity. , 2015, Annual review of entomology.

[18]  Robert E. Page,et al.  Genotypic variability in age polyethism and task specialization in the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  Christopher D. Smith,et al.  Patterns of DNA Methylation in Development, Division of Labor and Hybridization in an Ant with Genetic Caste Determination , 2012, PloS one.

[20]  G. Robinson,et al.  DNA methylation dynamics, metabolic fluxes, gene splicing, and alternative phenotypes in honey bees , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  G. Amdam,et al.  In-hive patterns of temporal polyethism in strains of honey bees (Apis mellifera) with distinct genetic backgrounds , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  L. Keller,et al.  Asexual reproduction in introduced and native populations of the ant Cerapachys biroi , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[23]  Christine G. Elsik,et al.  RNA interference knockdown of DNA methyl-transferase 3 affects gene alternative splicing in the honey bee , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  R. A. Drewell,et al.  Kin conflict in insect societies: a new epigenetic perspective. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  W. Reik,et al.  Shifting behaviour: epigenetic reprogramming in eusocial insects. , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.

[26]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Eusocial insects as emerging models for behavioural epigenetics , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[27]  Andrew P. Feinberg,et al.  Reversible switching between epigenetic states in honeybee behavioral subcastes , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  R. Maleszka,et al.  Insects as innovative models for functional studies of DNA methylation. , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[29]  Brian R. Herb.  Epigenetics as an answer to Darwin’s “special difficulty” , 2014, Front. Genet..

[30]  Doron Betel,et al.  Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution , 2015, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[31]  E. Dermitzakis,et al.  Passive and active DNA methylation and the interplay with genetic variation in gene regulation , 2013, eLife.

[32]  B. Ujvari,et al.  DNA methylation in the termite Coptotermes lacteus , 2011, Insectes Sociaux.

[33]  J. Jurka.  Repbase update: a database and an electronic journal of repetitive elements. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[34]  L. Pachter,et al.  A diverse epigenetic landscape at human exons with implication for expression , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  Hui Xiang,et al.  Genome-wide and Caste-Specific DNA Methylomes of the Ants Camponotus floridanus and Harpegnathos saltator , 2012, Current Biology.

[36]  E. Abouheif,et al.  Epigenetic variation in the Egfr gene generates quantitative variation in a complex trait in ants , 2015, Nature Communications.

[37]  R. Bonasio.  The role of chromatin and epigenetics in the polyphenisms of ant castes. , 2014, Briefings in functional genomics.

[38]  F. Ravary,et al.  Absence of individual sterility in thelytokous colonies of the ant Cerapachys biroi Forel (Formicidae, Cerapachyinae) , 2004, Insectes Sociaux.

[39]  J. Strassmann,et al.  DNA methylation is widespread across social Hymenoptera , 2008, Current Biology.

[40]  R. Kucharski,et al.  Differentially methylated obligatory epialleles modulate context-dependent LAM gene expression in the honeybee Apis mellifera , 2016, Epigenetics.

[41]  R. Lister,et al.  Epigenomics and the control of fate, form and function in social insects. , 2014, Current opinion in insect science.

[42]  Guojie Zhang,et al.  The Genome of the Clonal Raider Ant Cerapachys biroi , 2014, Current Biology.

[43]  Laurent Keller,et al.  Ant genomics sheds light on the molecular regulation of social organization , 2013, Genome Biology.

[44]  M. Szyf,et al.  The dynamic nature of DNA methylation: a role in response to social and seasonal variation. , 2014, Integrative and comparative biology.

[45]  S. Forêt,et al.  The Honey Bee Epigenomes: Differential Methylation of Brain DNA in Queens and Workers , 2010, PLoS biology.