The article uses Ross Perot's campaign for president in 1992 as a case study in how two key political institutions, the conventional political press and the party system, mediate the effects of political communication. From an analysis of events in both the spring of 1992 and the general election, the Texan was highly effective when he could appeal to voters in an essentially unmediated fashion. His candidacy failed, however, because it could not deal effectively with the political institutions by which the United States customarily selects its presidents. For example, Perot's appearances on morning interview programs persuaded roughly 20 percent of those seeing them to support his candidacy. Because the audiences for these shows were relatively small, however, Perot's initial rise in the polls and his subsequent decline were driven mainly by coverage in the conventional press. Part I of the article deals with the earliest, relatively unmediated phase of Perot's campaign and the take‐off phase of the medi...
[1]
T. Patterson.
Out Of Order
,
1993
.
[2]
J. Germond,et al.
Mad As Hell: Revolt at the Ballot Box, 1992
,
1993
.
[3]
J. Zaller,et al.
WHO GETS THE NEWS? ALTERNATIVE MEASURES OF NEWS RECEPTION AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH
,
1993
.
[4]
D. Gomery,et al.
American Media: The Wilson Quarterly Reader
,
1988
.
[5]
J. Zaller.
Positive Constructs of Public Opinion.
,
1994
.
[6]
M. J. Robinson,et al.
Over the wire and on TV
,
1983
.
[7]
Thomas E. Patterson,et al.
The mass media election
,
1980
.