Comparison of the 2001 BRFSS and the IPAQ Physical Activity Questionnaires.

PURPOSE The 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) physical activity module and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) are used in population studies to determine the prevalence of physical activity. The comparability of the prevalence estimates has not been compared in U.S. adults. This study compares the physical activity prevalence estimates from the BRFSS and the IPAQ. METHODS A telephone survey was administered to a random sample of 11,211 U.S. adults aged 18-99 yr who were enrolled in the National Physical Activity and Weight Loss Survey. Data were analyzed from 9945 adults who provided complete data on the BRFSS and the IPAQ. Prevalence estimates were computed (1) applying the BRFSS scoring scheme for both questionnaires (2). Kappa statistics were used to compare prevalence estimates generated from the BRFSS and the IPAQ. RESULTS When scored using the BRFSS protocol, agreement between physical activity categories was fair (kappa = 0.34-0.49). Prevalence estimates were higher on the IPAQ than the BRFSS for the lowest category (inactive) by 0.1-3.9% and for the highest category (meets recommendations) by 0.2-9.7%. When scored using their own scoring, agreement between physical activity categories was lower (kappa = 0.26-0.39). The prevalence estimates on the IPAQ were higher than on the BRFSS for the lowest physical activity category by 0.2-13.3% and for the highest physical activity category by 0-16.4%. Differences in physical activity categories were observed for sex, age, income, education, and body mass index on both questionnaires. CONCLUSION Because of differences in the physical activity prevalence estimates, direct comparison of the BRFSS and IPAQ prevalence estimates is not recommended.

[1]  Y. Miller,et al.  International Differences in Management of Physical Activity Data: Can They Explain Some of the Difference in Prevalence Estimates? , 2005 .

[2]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Occupational Physical Activity: Reliability and Comparison of Activity Levels , 2005 .

[3]  M. K. Torstveit,et al.  [Are young Norwegian women sufficiently physically active?]. , 2004, Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening.

[4]  Alfred Rütten,et al.  Self-rated health and physical activity in the European Union , 2004, Sozial- und Präventivmedizin/Social and Preventive Medicine.

[5]  Alfred Rütten,et al.  Prevalence of physical activity in the European Union , 2004, Sozial- und Präventivmedizin/Social and Preventive Medicine.

[6]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Considerations for Physical Activity Research: Variations on a Theme , 2004 .

[7]  Kerry Mummery,et al.  Method: Comparison of surveys used to measure physical activity , 2004, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[8]  V. Lehtinen,et al.  Mental health and physical activity in the European Union , 2004, Sozial- und Präventivmedizin.

[9]  A. Rütten,et al.  Perceptions of environmental opportunities for physical activity in the European Union , 2004, Sozial- und Präventivmedizin.

[10]  D. Bassett,et al.  Assessment of physical activity by telephone interview versus objective monitoring. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  C. Victora,et al.  Physical inactivity: prevalence and associated variables in Brazilian adults. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  Ilse de Bourdeaudhuij,et al.  Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity in a Sample of Belgian Adults , 2003, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[13]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij,et al.  Addressing overreporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample , 2003, Public Health Nutrition.

[15]  M. Sjöström,et al.  Physical activity monitoring in Europe. The European Physical Activity Surveillance System (EUPASS) approach and indicator testing , 2003, Public Health Nutrition.

[16]  J. Welshman,et al.  Using different physical activity measurements in eight European countries. Results of the European Physical Activity Surveillance System (EUPASS) time series survey , 2003, Public Health Nutrition.

[17]  Harold W. Kohl,et al.  Prevalence of physical activity, including lifestyle activities among adults--United States, 2000-2001. , 2003, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[18]  J. Guilbert.  The world health report 2002 - reducing risks, promoting healthy life. , 2003, Education for health.

[19]  M. Pratt,et al.  Public health surveillance of physical activity. , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[20]  K. Patrick,et al.  Physical Activity and Public Health: A Recommendation From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine , 1995 .

[21]  D. Jacobs,et al.  A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity. , 1985, Public health reports.

[22]  A S Leon,et al.  A questionnaire for the assessment of leisure time physical activities. , 1978, Journal of chronic diseases.

[23]  J. L. Harrison,et al.  The Government Printing Office , 1968, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[24]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .