Micromechanical model of polycrystalline shape memory alloys based on Reuss assumption

To understand the complicated thermodynamical behaviors of shape memory alloys (SMA) and to optimally design structures with SMA components, a simple yet micromechanical model of SMA was proposed based on Reuss assumption, namely, an assumption of uniform stress state in every grain. Since interaction between grains doesn't exist in Reuss assumption, we considered a specific distribution for phase interaction energy and also hardening due to the grain interaction. Choosing adequate distributions for both grain orientation and phase interaction energy, the model could describe the round shape around yielding stresses and the inner loops on a stress-strain hysteresis relationship and the temperature differences between transformation start and finish. They were in quantitative agreement with available experimental data for wires. Moreover, a heat balance equation was combined with the constitutive equation to take into account the effect of temperature change of the material. This combined model could capture quantitatively a temperature variation of about 20K in one cycle due to self heating and cooling as well as the effect of strain rate on stress-strain hysteresis loops. Finally, by reducing this proposed model to a model for unidirectional loading we showed that the proposed model became our previously developed macromechanical 1D model. Thus we could bridge the gap between a grain-based micromechanical model and a specimen-based macromechanical 1D model.

[1]  F. Gandhi,et al.  PASSIVE DAMPING AUGMENTATION OF A VIBRATING BEAM USING PSEUDOELASTIC SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY WIRES , 2002 .

[2]  Ken Gall,et al.  The role of texture in tension–compression asymmetry in polycrystalline NiTi , 1999 .

[3]  P. McCormick,et al.  Intrinsic thermal-mechanical behaviour associated with the stress-induced martensitic transformation in NiTi , 1993 .

[4]  Miinshiou Huang,et al.  A multivariant micromechanical model for SMAs Part 2. Polycrystal model , 2000 .

[5]  T Prakash G. Thamburaja,et al.  Polycrystalline shape-memory materials: effect of crystallographic texture , 2001 .

[6]  F. Falk,et al.  Pseudoelastic stress-strain curves of polycrystalline shape memory alloys calculated from single crystal data , 1989 .

[7]  Perry H Leo,et al.  The use of shape memory alloys for passive structural damping , 1995 .

[8]  T. Ikeda,et al.  Micromechanical modeling of polycrystalline shape-memory alloys including thermo-mechanical coupling , 2003 .

[9]  Yuji Matsuzaki,et al.  One-dimensional pseudoelastic theory of shape memory alloys , 1998 .

[10]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Thermodynamic models of pseudoelastic behaviour of shape memory alloys , 1992 .

[11]  Yukio Adachi,et al.  Development of shape memory alloy damper for intelligent bridge systems , 1999, Smart Structures.

[12]  Tadashige Ikeda,et al.  Thermo-mechanical behavior associated with pseudoelastic transformation of shape memory alloys , 2001 .

[13]  Hisashi Naito,et al.  Inner loops of pseudoelastic hysteresis of shape memory alloys: Preisach approach , 2002, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[14]  H. Naito,et al.  Analytical Study on Training Effect of Pseudoelastic Transformation of Shape Memory Alloys in Cyclic Loading , 2001 .

[15]  Yuji Matsuzaki,et al.  Pseudoelastic theory of shape memory alloys , 1996, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.