Voting power on a graph connected political space with an application to decision-making in the Council of the European Union

We analyze the problem of computing the Banzhaf and Shapley power indices for graph restricted voting games, defined in a particular class of graphs, that we called line-clique. A line-clique graph is a model of a uni-dimensional political space in which voters with the same bliss point are the connected vertices of a clique and then other arcs connect nodes of consecutive cliques. The interest to this model comes from its correspondence to the spatial voting game: a model that has been proposed and used by political analysts to understand nations’ behavior and the political outcome of the bargaining process within the EU Council. Broadly speaking, the computation of a power index of a graph restricted game is strongly #P-complete, as it includes the enumeration of all winning coalitions. Nevertheless, we show that in this special class of graph coalitions can be enumerated by dynamic programming, resulting in a pseudo-polynomial algorithm and proving that the problem only weakly #P-complete. After implementing our new algorithms and finding that they are very fast in practice, we analyze the voting behavior in the EU Council, as for this application previous research compiled a large data set concerning nations’ political positions and political outcomes. We will test whether voting power has an effect on the political outcome, more precisely, whether nations that are favored by their weight and position can influence the political outcome to their advantages. Using linear regressions, we will see that unrestricted power indices are not capable of any predictive property, but graph restricted indices are. The statistic evidence shows that the combination of voting weight and network position is a source of power that affects the political outcome to the advantage of a country.

[1]  Pradeep Dubey,et al.  Mathematical Properties of the Banzhaf Power Index , 1979, Math. Oper. Res..

[2]  M. Holler,et al.  Citations (this article cites 26 articles hosted on the SAGE Journals Online and HighWire Press platforms): , 2005 .

[3]  T. Matsui,et al.  A SURVEY OF ALGORITHMS FOR CALCULATING POWER INDICES OF WEIGHTED MAJORITY GAMES , 2000 .

[4]  L. Penrose The Elementary Statistics of Majority Voting , 1946 .

[5]  Rafael Amer,et al.  The modified Banzhaf value for games with coalition structure: an axiomatic characterization , 2002, Math. Soc. Sci..

[6]  Mika Widgrén,et al.  Power Measurement as Sensitivity Analysis , 2004 .

[7]  Justo Puerto,et al.  A stochastic approach to approximate values in cooperative games , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  Random Generation of Combinatorial Structures from a Uniform Distribution , 1986, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[9]  Craig A. Tovey,et al.  Solving problems on recursively constructed graphs , 2009, CSUR.

[10]  J. M. Bilbao,et al.  Generating functions for computing power indices efficiently , 2000 .

[11]  Jorge Rodríguez Veiga,et al.  Implementing generating functions to obtain power indices with coalition configuration , 2015, Discret. Appl. Math..

[12]  Gerald Schneider,et al.  Bargaining Power in the European Union: An Evaluation of Competing Game-Theoretic Models , 2010 .

[13]  W. Reuter,et al.  Theoretical vs. Empirical Power Indices: Do Preferences Matter? , 2014 .

[14]  Stefan Napel,et al.  The Possibility of a Preference-Based Power Index , 2005 .

[15]  Jerry S. Kelly,et al.  NP-completeness of some problems concerning voting games , 1990 .

[16]  B. Barry,et al.  Is it Better to Be Powerful or Lucky?: Part I , 1980 .

[17]  George Tsebelis,et al.  Why Resist the Temptation to Apply Power Indices to the European Union? , 1999 .

[18]  Martin Shubik,et al.  A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System , 1954, American Political Science Review.

[19]  M. G. Fiestras-Janeiro,et al.  The Banzhaf value and communication situations , 2006 .

[20]  Francesco Passarelli,et al.  Preferences, the Agenda Setter, and the Distribution of Power in the EU , 2006, Soc. Choice Welf..

[21]  G. Owen VALUES OF GAMES WITH A PRIORI UNIONS , 1977 .

[22]  B. Peleg,et al.  Introduction to the Theory of Cooperative Games , 1983 .

[23]  Stefan Napel,et al.  The Inter-Institutional Distribution of Power in EU Codecision , 2004, Soc. Choice Welf..

[24]  M. Gloria Fiestras-Janeiro,et al.  Computing Banzhaf-Coleman and Shapley-Shubik power indices with incompatible players , 2015, Appl. Math. Comput..

[25]  Dan S. Felsenthal,et al.  The Treaty of Nice and qualified majority voting , 2001, Soc. Choice Welf..

[26]  Tomomi Matsui,et al.  NP-completeness for calculating power indices of weighted majority games , 2001, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[27]  M. Guerry,et al.  Probabilistic Spatial Power Indexes: The Impact of Issue Saliences and Distance Selection , 2014, Group Decision and Negotiation.

[28]  Francesco Passarelli,et al.  Who has the power in the EU? , 2009, Math. Soc. Sci..

[29]  J. Cross,et al.  A new dataset on decision-making in the European Union before and after the 2004 and 2007 enlargements (DEUII) , 2012 .

[30]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  The Complexity of Computing the Permanent , 1979, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[31]  V. Yakuba,et al.  Evaluation of Banzhaf index with restrictions on coalitions formation , 2008, Math. Comput. Model..

[32]  D. Leech,et al.  Voting power and voting blocs , 2006 .

[33]  L. Shapley A Value for n-person Games , 1988 .

[34]  Daniel Gómez,et al.  Polynomial calculation of the Shapley value based on sampling , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[35]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  A Pseudo-Polynomial Algorithm for Computing Power Indices in Graph-Restricted Weighted Voting Games , 2015, IJCAI.

[36]  Jesús Mario Bilbao,et al.  Generating Functions for Computing the Myerson Value , 2002, Ann. Oper. Res..

[37]  Jesús Mario Bilbao,et al.  Weighted multiple majority games with unions: Generating functions and applications to the European Union , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  Romeo Rizzi,et al.  The complexity of power indexes with graph restricted coalitions , 2015, Math. Soc. Sci..

[39]  V. Fragnelli,et al.  Embedding Classical Indices in the FP Family , 2011 .

[40]  Eyal Winter,et al.  Spectrum value for coalitional games , 2013, Games Econ. Behav..

[41]  Stefan Napel,et al.  Strategic versus non-strategic voting power in the EU Council of Ministers: the consultation procedure , 2011, Soc. Choice Welf..

[42]  B. Steunenberg,et al.  Strategic Power in the European Union , 1999 .

[43]  Stefano Benati,et al.  Probabilistic spatial power indexes , 2011, Social Choice and Welfare.

[44]  Mathieu Martin,et al.  The Owen and Shapley spatial power indices: A comparison and a generalization , 2017, Math. Soc. Sci..

[45]  Dennis Leech,et al.  Computing Power Indices for Large Voting Games , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[46]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Graphs and Cooperation in Games , 1977, Math. Oper. Res..

[47]  Takeaki Uno,et al.  Efficient Computation of Power Indices for Weighted Majority Games , 2012, ISAAC.

[48]  Daniel Gómez,et al.  Improving polynomial estimation of the Shapley value by stratified random sampling with optimum allocation , 2017, Comput. Oper. Res..

[49]  Hans Peters,et al.  An axiomatic characterization of the Owen–Shapley spatial power index , 2016, International Journal of Game Theory.

[50]  Elena Mielcová,et al.  Spatial power indices with applications on real voting data from the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Parliament , 2016, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  Mika Widgrén,et al.  A Priori versus Empirical Voting Power in the EU Council of Ministers , 2004 .