Frame error model in rural Wi-Fi networks

Commonly used frame loss models for simulations over Wi-Fi channels assume a simple double regression model with threshold. This model is widely accepted, but few measurements are available in the literature that try to validate it. As far as we know, none of them is based on field trials at the frame level. We present a series of measurements for relating transmission distance and packet loss on a Wi-Fi network in rural areas and propose a model that relates distance with packet loss probability. We show that a simple double regression propagation model like the one used in the ns-2 simulator can miss important transmission impairments that are apparent even at short transmitter-receiver distances. Measurements also show that packet loss at the frame level is a Bernoullian process for time spans of few seconds. We relate the packet loss probability to the received signal level using standard models for additive white Gaussian noise channels. The resulting model is much more similar to the measured channels than the simple models where all packets are received when the distance is below a given threshold and all are lost when the threshold is exceeded.

[1]  Paolo Barsocchi,et al.  Validation for 802 . 11 b Wireless Channel Measurements , 2006 .

[2]  Dominique Dhoutaut,et al.  Experiments with 802.1 1 b in ad hoc configurations , 2003 .

[3]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Wireless communications , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[4]  Chris Heegard Range versus Rate in IEEE 802.11g Wireless Local Area Networks by , 2001 .

[5]  C. Soras,et al.  Analysis and design of an inverted-F antenna printed on a PCMCIA card for the 2.4 GHz ISM band , 2002 .

[6]  Robert Morris,et al.  Link-level measurements from an 802.11b mesh network , 2004, SIGCOMM 2004.

[7]  Konstantina Papagiannaki,et al.  Experimental Characterization of Home Wireless Networks and Design Implications , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[8]  Ratul Mahajan,et al.  Measurement-based models of delivery and interference in static wireless networks , 2006, SIGCOMM 2006.

[9]  A. J. Rustako,et al.  Radio propagation at microwave frequencies for line-of-sight microcellular mobile and personal communications , 1991 .

[10]  Chris Heegard Range versus Rate in IEEE 802 . 11 g Wireless Local Area Networks , 2001 .

[11]  Paolo Barsocchi,et al.  Transmission range and frame error process in rural area Wi-Fi networks , 2006 .

[12]  Jason Liu,et al.  Experimental evaluation of wireless simulation assumptions , 2004, MSWiM '04.

[13]  Chris Heegard,et al.  High performance wireless Ethernet , 2001 .

[14]  Kameswari Chebrolu,et al.  Long-distance 802.11b links: performance measurements and experience , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[15]  David A. Maltz,et al.  A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols , 1998, MobiCom '98.

[16]  Giuseppe Anastasi,et al.  Wi-fi in ad hoc mode: a measurement study , 2004, Second IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[17]  Sergio Benedetto,et al.  Digital Transmission Theory , 1987 .

[18]  E. Green,et al.  Microcellular Propagation Measurements In An Urban Environment , 1991, IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications..

[19]  Isabelle Guérin Lassous,et al.  Experiments with 802.11b in ad hoc configurations , 2003, 14th IEEE Proceedings on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2003. PIMRC 2003..

[20]  Ratul Mahajan,et al.  Measurement-based models of delivery and interference in static wireless networks , 2006, SIGCOMM.