Automatic data driven vegetation modeling for lidar simulation

Traditional lidar simulations render surface models to generate simulated range data. For objects with welldefined surfaces, this approach works well, and traditional 3D scene reconstruction algorithms can be employed to automatically generate the surface models. This approach breaks down, though, for many trees, tall grasses, and other objects with fine-scale geometry: surface models do not easily represent the geometry, and automated reconstruction from real data is difficult. In this paper, we introduce a new stochastic volumetric model that better captures the complexities of real lidar data of vegetation and is far better suited for automatic modeling of scenes from field collected lidar data. We also introduce several methods for automatic modeling and for simulating lidar data utilizing the new model. To measure the performance of the stochastic simulation we use histogram comparison metrics to quantify the differences between data produced by the real and simulated lidar. We evaluate our approach on a range of real world datasets and show improved fidelity for simulating geo-specific outdoor, vegetation scenes.

[1]  H. Jones,et al.  Remote Sensing of Vegetation: Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 2010 .

[2]  Alberto Lacaze,et al.  USING RIVET FOR PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF ROBOTIC SYSTEMS , 2009 .

[3]  Michio Kise,et al.  PVS: A system for large scale outdoor perception performance evaluation , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Markus H. Gross,et al.  Feature Preserving Point Set Surfaces based on Non‐Linear Kernel Regression , 2009, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[5]  Andrew Howard,et al.  Design and use paradigms for Gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[6]  Julian Ryde,et al.  Performance of laser and radar ranging devices in adverse environmental conditions , 2009, J. Field Robotics.

[7]  Matt Olson,et al.  Automatic reconstruction of tree skeletal structures from point clouds , 2010, ACM Trans. Graph..

[8]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Small-footprint laser scanning simulator for system validation, error assessment, and algorithm development. , 2009 .

[9]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  Static Calibration and Analysis of the Velodyne HDL-64E S2 for High Accuracy Mobile Scanning , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[10]  Stefano Carpin,et al.  USARSim: a robot simulator for research and education , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Frédéric Bretar,et al.  Full-waveform topographic lidar : State-of-the-art , 2009 .

[12]  M. Bosse,et al.  Automatic segmentation of 3D laser point clouds by ellipsoidal region growing , 2009, ICRA 2009.

[13]  C. Glennie Rigorous 3D error analysis of kinematic scanning LIDAR systems , 2007 .

[14]  Raju V. Kala,et al.  Sensor modeling for the Virtual Autonomous Navigation Environment , 2009, 2009 IEEE Sensors.

[15]  Amitabh Varshney,et al.  Statistical geometry representation for efficient transmission and rendering , 2005, TOGS.

[16]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Analysis and Removal of Artifacts in 3-D LADAR Data , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  C. Tropea,et al.  Light Scattering from Small Particles , 2003 .

[18]  Aristid Lindenmayer,et al.  Mathematical Models for Cellular Interactions in Development , 1968 .

[19]  A. Lindenmayer Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development. I. Filaments with one-sided inputs. , 1968, Journal of theoretical biology.