Measuring energy intensity in Japan: A new method

Energy intensity and energy conservation have been important pillars of energy policies in Japan. Recently, the government has introduced new initiatives to enhance energy efficiency and reduce energy intensity. We analyze the energy intensity in Japan for the period 1973–2006 by proposing a new method which takes into account all other inputs used in production and corrects for the bias in the traditional energy intensity measure. We show that the traditional energy intensity measure has serious flaws. The traditional measure overestimates actual energy intensity before the mid-1980s and largely underestimates afterwards. It is found that aggregate energy intensity has risen remarkably from 1991 to 2001. The main cause of this rise is the rapid rise in energy intensity in manufacturing and energy sectors.

[1]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Accounting frameworks for tracking energy efficiency trends , 2010 .

[2]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in Japan , 2008 .

[3]  H. Huntington.  Structural Change and U.S. Energy Use: Recent Patterns , 2010 .

[4]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[5]  Mary O'Mahony,et al.  Output, Input and Productivity Measures at the Industry Level: The EU KLEMS Database , 2009 .

[6]  ZhongXiang Zhang.  Why Did the Energy Intensity Fall in China's Industrial Sector in the 1990s? The Relative Importance of Structural Change and Intensity Change , 2003 .

[7]  Hirofumi Fukuyama,et al.  Estimating output gains by means of Luenberger efficiency measures , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Osman Zaim,et al.  Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: a DEA framework , 2004 .

[9]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: Some methodological developments , 2012 .

[10]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  MULTILATERAL COMPARISONS OF OUTPUT, INPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY USING SUPERLATIVE INDEX NUMBERS* , 1982 .

[11]  Nan Zhou,et al.  A comparative study of energy consumption and efficiency of Japanese and Chinese manufacturing industry , 2014 .

[12]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[13]  Yukiko Fukasaku,et al.  Energy and environment policy integration: The case of energy conservation policies and technologies in Japan , 1995 .

[14]  J. C. J. M. Bergh,et al.  Comparing structural decomposition analysis and index , 2003 .

[15]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2000 .

[16]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance , 2008 .

[17]  R. Färe,et al.  Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency , 1998 .

[18]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Decomposition methodology in industrial energy demand analysis , 1995 .

[19]  W. Diewert.  THE MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCTIVITY , 1992 .

[20]  Martin Dresner,et al.  PARTIAL PRODUCTIVITY MEASURES AND TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY IN THE AIR TRANSPORT INDUSTRY: LIMITATIONS AND USES , 1992 .

[21]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[22]  Panagiotis D. Zervopoulos,et al.  Estimating the technical efficiency of health care systems: A cross-country comparison using the directional distance function , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  J. Duro,et al.  International inequality in energy intensity levels and the role of production composition and energy efficiency: An analysis of OECD countries , 2010 .

[24]  Rolf Färe,et al.  An Economic Approach to Achievement and Improvement Indexes , 2001 .

[25]  Shigeharu Okajima,et al.  Analysis of energy intensity in Japan , 2013 .

[26]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental Performance : an Index Number Approach , 2004 .

[27]  Chunhua Wang,et al.  Changing energy intensity of economies in the world and its decomposition , 2013 .

[28]  Satoshi Tanishima,et al.  Polices for increasing energy efficiency: Thirty years of experience in OECD countries , 2006 .

[29]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .

[30]  Adam Rose,et al.  INPUT-OUTPUT STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL , 1996 .

[31]  R. R. Russell,et al.  Technological Change, Technological Catch-up, and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence , 2002 .

[32]  Lee Schipper,et al.  Energy Efficiency and Human Activity: Past Trends, Future Prospects , 1992 .

[33]  Elena Verdolini,et al.  Energy Intensity Developments in 40 Major Economies: Structural Change or Technology Improvement? , 2013 .

[34]  George Emm. Halkos,et al.  A conditional directional distance function approach for measuring regional environmental efficiency: Evidence from UK regions , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Peter Mulder,et al.  Structural Change and Convergence of Energy Intensity Across OECD Countries, 1970-2005 , 2012 .