Effect of flow mechanism with multi-nonlinearity on production of shale gas

Abstract Different from oil reservoirs, variations of gas properties (such as viscosity, Z-factor and gas compressibility) under different pressures is strongly nonlinear and non-Darcy effect is significant in fractures due to high rate. Shale gas reservoirs are extremely tight with nanopores, where Darcy's law breaks down and the flow behavior is significantly influenced by pore scale and pressure. 20%–80% of the shale gas in place (in-situ) is adsorbed to organic matters and the desorption is a nonlinear process varying with pressure. Furthermore, hydraulic fractures and natural fractures close gradually, as the production proceeds, resulting in a non-linear relationship between permeability and pressure. However, the multi-nonlinear flow mechanism, as well as its effect on gas production, in the process of shale gas development is always overlooked by both laboratories and industrial analyses. Based on the five-region model, finite difference method is applied to get numerical solution in this paper. Afterwards, the effect of nonlinear mechanism on production is analyzed, according to which, the enhanced ultimate recovery (EUR) schemes are proposed. The results show that the effects of compressibility, multi-scale flow, stress sensitivity and non-Darcy flow in fractures on production are significant during early stage and should be considered in well testing model. For middle and late production stages, the effects of compressibility, multi-scale flow, stress sensitivity in natural fractures should be considered in the Rate Transient Analysis (RTA) model and long-term production prediction model. The negative effect of stress sensitivity and non-Darcy flow can be reduced or mitigated by optimizing schedule and controlling early pressure drawdown. Furthermore, some nonlinear factors can be used positively by refracturing, which reduces formation pressure and consequently leading to the increase of gas compressibility, desorption compressibility and apparent permeability.

[1]  Robert A. Wattenbarger,et al.  Rate Transient Analysis in Naturally Fractured Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2008 .

[2]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  The effect of natural fracture's closure on long-term gas production from unconventional resources , 2014 .

[3]  C. M. Freeman.  Study of Multi-scale Transport Phenomena in Tight Gas and Shale Gas Reservoir Systems , 2013 .

[4]  A. C. Bumb,et al.  Gas-well testing in the presence of desorption for coalbed methane and devonian shale , 1988 .

[5]  Manouchehr Haghighi,et al.  Development of New Type Curves for Production Analysis in Naturally Fractured Shale Gas/Tight Gas Reservoirs , 2013 .

[6]  Michael Thambynayagam,et al.  Semi-Analytical Production Simulation of Complex Hydraulic Fracture Network , 2012 .

[7]  T. Blasingame,et al.  Application of convolution theory for solving non-linear flow problems: gas flow systems , 2003 .

[8]  F. Javadpour.  Nanopores and Apparent Permeability of Gas Flow in Mudrocks (Shales and Siltstone) , 2009 .

[9]  F. Javadpour,et al.  Nanoscale Gas Flow in Shale Gas Sediments , 2007 .

[10]  Shicheng Zhang,et al.  Experimental Study of Fracture Permeability for Stimulated Reservoir Volume (SRV) in Shale Formation , 2013, Transport in Porous Media.

[11]  Faruk Civan,et al.  Shale-Gas Permeability and Diffusivity Inferred by Improved Formulation of Relevant Retention and Transport Mechanisms , 2011 .

[12]  Rajagopal Raghavan,et al.  Productivity Changes in Reservoirs With Stress-Dependent Permeability , 2004 .

[13]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Modification of the Transient Linear Flow Distance of Investigation Calculation for Use in Hydraulic Fracture Property Determination , 2014 .

[14]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  An integrated reservoir model for unconventional resources, coupling pressure dependent phenomena , 2014 .

[15]  George Em Karniadakis,et al.  REPORT: A MODEL FOR FLOWS IN CHANNELS, PIPES, AND DUCTS AT MICRO AND NANO SCALES , 1999 .

[16]  Robert A. Wattenbarger,et al.  Multi-stage Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Shale Gas Well Rate Transient Analysis , 2010 .

[17]  Erdal Ozkan,et al.  Pressure-Dependent Natural-Fracture Permeability in Shale and Its Effect on Shale-Gas Well Production , 2013 .

[18]  Faruk Civan,et al.  Effective Correlation of Apparent Gas Permeability in Tight Porous Media , 2010 .

[19]  Antonin Settari,et al.  A Pore Scale Gas Flow Model for Shale Gas Reservoir , 2012 .

[20]  Yulong Zhao,et al.  Performance of fractured horizontal well with stimulated reservoir volume in unconventional gas reservoir , 2014 .

[21]  K. Sepehrnoori,et al.  Gas permeability model considering rock deformation and slippage in low permeability water-bearing gas reservoirs , 2014 .

[22]  Haitao Wang,et al.  Performance of multiple fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs with consideration of multiple mechanisms , 2014 .

[23]  J. B. Walsh,et al.  EFFECT OF PORE PRESSURE AND CONFINING PRESSURE ON FRACTURE PERMEABILITY , 1981 .

[24]  Yuanping Cheng,et al.  Numerical assessment of the effect of equilibration time on coal permeability evolution characteristics , 2015 .

[25]  P. M. Dranchuk,et al.  Calculation of Z Factors For Natural Gases Using Equations of State , 1975 .

[26]  L. Mattar,et al.  Solution of a Non-linear Gas Flow Equation By the Perturbation Technique , 1980 .

[27]  H. J. Ramey,et al.  Non-Darcy Flow in Wells With Finite-Conductivity Vertical Fractures , 1982 .

[28]  Roberto Aguilera,et al.  Modeling Fractured Horizontal Wells As Dual Porosity Composite Reservoirs - Application To Tight Gas, Shale Gas And Tight Oil Cases , 2011 .

[29]  H. Pascal,et al.  Analysis Of Vertical Fracture Length And Non-Darcy Flow Coefficient Using Variable Rate Tests , 1980 .

[30]  A. Pires,et al.  A New Rigorous Analytical Solution for a Vertical Fractured Well in Gas Reservoirs , 2012 .

[31]  C. E. Jr. Cooke,et al.  Conductivity of Fracture Proppants in Multiple Layers , 1973 .

[32]  Ram G. Agarwal,et al.  "Real Gas Pseudo-Time" - A New Function For Pressure Buildup Analysis Of MHF Gas Wells , 1979 .

[33]  Jinzhou Zhao,et al.  “Triple porosity” modeling of transient well test and rate decline analysis for multi-fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoirs , 2013 .

[34]  Turgay Ertekin,et al.  DYNAMIC GAS SLIPPAGE: A UNIQUE DUAL-MECHANISM APPROACH TO THE FLOW OF GAS IN TIGHT FORMATIONS. , 1986 .

[35]  Linsong Cheng,et al.  A mathematical model for drainage and desorption area analysis during shale gas production , 2014 .

[36]  Jin Yang,et al.  A new mathematical model considering adsorption and desorption process for productivity prediction of volume fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs , 2014 .

[37]  Mario H. Gonzalez,et al.  The Viscosity of Natural Gases , 1966 .

[38]  Rajagopal Raghavan,et al.  Comparison of Fractured-Horizontal-Well Performance in Tight Sand and Shale Reservoirs , 2011 .

[39]  Farzam Javadpour,et al.  Gas flow in ultra-tight shale strata , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[40]  Louis Mattar,et al.  Analytical Model for Unconventional Multifractured Composite Systems , 2013 .

[41]  A. Hasan,et al.  Prefracture Testing in Tight Gas Reservoirs (includes associated papers 15913, 15964, 15989, 16469 and 16579 ) , 1986 .

[42]  Mingjun Chen,et al.  Laboratory measurement and interpretation of nonlinear gas flow in shale , 2015 .

[43]  Jingjing Guo,et al.  Pressure Transient Analysis for Multi-stage Fractured Horizontal Wells in Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2012 .

[44]  Hongxing Zhou,et al.  A Mathematical Model of Coupled Gas Flow and Coal Deformation with Gas Diffusion and Klinkenberg Effects , 2015, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[45]  Michael Thambynayagam,et al.  Semianalytical Production Simulation of Complex Hydraulic-Fracture Networks , 2013 .

[46]  A. Pires,et al.  A Variable-Rate Solution to the Nonlinear Diffusivity Gas Equation by Use of Green's-Function Method , 2013 .

[47]  R. Wattenbarger,et al.  Modelling and Analysis of Shale Gas Production With a Skin Effect , 2009 .