Dealing with Data: A Case Study on Information and Data Management Literacy

The launch of the eagle-i Consortium, a collaborative network for sharing information about research resources, such as protocols and reagents, provides a vivid demonstration of the challenges that researchers, libraries and institutions face in making their data available to others.

[1]  Christine McGourty.  Dealing with the data , 1989, Nature.

[2]  D. Lipman,et al.  National Center for Biotechnology Information , 2019, Springer Reference Medizin.

[3]  P H Abelson,et al.  Science and Technology Policy , 1995, Science.

[4]  Hans-Michael Müller,et al.  The Neuroscience Information Framework: A Data and Knowledge Environment for Neuroscience , 2008, Neuroinformatics.

[5]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Data curation + process curation=data integration + science , 2008, Briefings Bioinform..

[6]  Winston A Hide,et al.  Big data: The future of biocuration , 2008, Nature.

[7]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[8]  NIF: Neuroscience Information Framework , 2010 .

[9]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions , 2011, PloS one.

[10]  Rob W.W. Hooft,et al.  The value of data , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[11]  Carlo Torniai,et al.  Developing an Application Ontology for Biomedical Resource Annotation and Retrieval: Challenges and Lessons Learned , 2011, ICBO.

[12]  Anne Cambon-Thomsen,et al.  The role of a bioresource research impact factor as an incentive to share human bioresources , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[13]  Jennifer C Molloy,et al.  The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Means Better Science , 2011, PLoS biology.

[14]  David Robinson,et al.  Research resources: curating the new eagle-i discovery system , 2012, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[15]  David M. Shotton,et al.  The Five Stars of Online Journal Articles - a Framework for Article Evaluation , 2012, D Lib Mag..