Variations in leaf mass per area according to N nutrition, plant age, and leaf position reflect ontogenetic plasticity in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)

Leaf mass per area (LMA) is a parameter the variability of which contributes to architectural plasticity. However its variations according to environment remain not completely understood. We hypothesise that LMA variations of winter oilseed rape (WOSR) follow an ontogenetic trajectory that can be modified by the environment. This was assessed at plant and leaf levels comparing four genotypes field-grown under different environmental conditions characterised by year and nitrogen nutrition. Leaves of the main stem of plants sampled between emergence and harvest were surfaced, oven-dried and weighed to calculate LMA of each individual leaf. At the plant level, LMA presented a common ontogenetic trajectory, which increases from seedling emergence to bolting and from then on decreases. Variations in LMA were related to the variations in plant demand, LMA decreased when demand increased. The trajectory was modified by low N nutrition that increased LMA but differently according to year and genotype, reflecting the plant plasticity. At the leaf level, variations for each individual leaf were related to the variations at the plant level. Plant plasticity and genotypic variability of the responses of LMA to N deficiency seemed to be related to differences in biomass allocation between leaves and stems.

[1]  N. Bertin,et al.  Short and Long Term Fluctuations of the Leaf Mass Per Area of Tomato Plants—Implications for Growth Models , 1998 .

[2]  M. Jeuffroy,et al.  Is crop N demand more closely related to dry matter accumulation or leaf area expansion during vegetative growth , 2007 .

[3]  Marie-Helene Jeuffroy,et al.  Crop species present different qualitative types of response to N deficiency during their vegetative growth , 2008 .

[4]  J. Suzuki,et al.  Competitive ability of two Brassica varieties in relation to biomass allocation and morphological plasticity under varying nutrient availability , 1999, Ecological Research.

[5]  Hans de Kroon,et al.  A modular concept of phenotypic plasticity in plants. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[6]  K. McConnaughay,et al.  Interpreting phenotypic plasticity : the importance of ontogeny , 2002 .

[7]  P. Struik,et al.  Effects of nitrogen on development and growth of the leaves of vegetables. 1. Appearance, expansion growth and life span of leaves of Brussels sprouts plants , 1995 .

[8]  M. M. Qaderi,et al.  Growth and physiological responses of canola (Brassica napus) to three components of global climate change: temperature, carbon dioxide and drought , 2006 .

[9]  Elsie Tittonel.  Evenements lies a l'evolution florale chez le colza brassica napus l. Var oleifera metzg , 1990 .

[10]  H. Huber,et al.  Spatial structure of stoloniferous herbs: an interplay between structural blue-print, ontogeny and phenotypic plasticity , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[11]  K. Hikosaka,et al.  Dynamics of leaf area and nitrogen in the canopy of an annual herb, Xanthium canadense , 2005, Oecologia.

[12]  P. McVetty,et al.  THE DETERMINATION AND VERIFICATION OF A BASELINE TEMPERATURE FOR THE GROWTH OF WESTAR SUMMER RAPE , 1989 .

[13]  Z. Shangguan,et al.  Specific leaf area, leaf nitrogen content, and photosynthetic acclimation of Trifolium repens L. seedlings grown at different irradiances and nitrogen concentrations , 2008, Photosynthetica.

[14]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[15]  J. Coleman,et al.  Can plants track changes in nutrient availability via changes in biomass partitioning? , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[16]  G. P. Cheplick.  A modular approach to biomass allocation in an invasive annual (Microstegium vimineum; Poaceae). , 2006, American journal of botany.

[17]  J. Schjoerring,et al.  Photosynthesis in leaves and siliques of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) , 1996, Plant and Soil.

[18]  J. Hillier,et al.  Plasticity of plant architecture in response to density: Using maize as a model , 2004 .

[19]  D. N. Baker,et al.  Seasonal Leaf Area-Leaf Weight Relationships in the Cotton Canopy , 1989 .

[20]  A. Winn,et al.  Relationships among growth, development and plastic response to environment quality in a perennial plant. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[21]  D. E. Escobar,et al.  Age Effects of Cotton Leaves on Light Reflectance, Transmittance, and Absorptance and on Water Content and Thickness1 , 1971 .

[22]  Jeffrey W. White,et al.  Variation in parameters related to leaf thickness in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) , 2005 .

[23]  L. Jesson,et al.  Leaf heteroblasty is not an adaptation to shade: seedling anatomical and physiological responses to light , 2007 .

[24]  M. H. Netzer,et al.  Evénements liés au passage du méristème de l'état végétatif à l'état reproducteur, chez le colza, Brassica napus. L. var. oleifera Metzg , 1989 .

[25]  Gustavo A. Slafer,et al.  Developmental responses to sowing date in wheat, barley and rapeseed , 2001 .

[26]  B. Habekotté.  A model of the phenological development of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) , 1997 .

[27]  Eric Justes,et al.  Determination of a Critical Nitrogen Dilution Curve for Winter Oilseed Rape , 1998 .

[28]  L. Poorter,et al.  Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[29]  W. Diepenbrock.  Yield analysis of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): a review , 2000 .

[30]  M. Bodson.  Changes in the carbohydrate content of the leaf and the apical bud of Sinapis during transition to flowering , 2004, Planta.