Assessing the transferability of airborne laser scanning and digital aerial photogrammetry derived growing stock volume models

Abstract Three-dimensional (3D) data from airborne laser scanning (ALS) and, more recently, digital aerial photogrammetry (DAP) have been successfully used to model forest attributes. While multi-temporal, wall-to-wall ALS data is not usually available, aerial imagery is regularly acquired in many regions. Thus, the combination of ALS and DAP data provide a sufficient temporal resolution to properly monitor forests. However, field data is needed to fit new forest attribute models for each 3D data acquisition, which is not always affordable. In this study, we examined whether transferability of growing stock volume (GSV) models may provide an improvement in the efficiency of forest inventories updating. We used two available ALS datasets acquired with different characteristics in 2009 and 2010, respectively, generated two DAP point clouds from imagery collected in 2010 and 2017, and utilized field data from two ground surveys conducted in 2009 and 2016-2017. We first analyzed the stability of point cloud derived metrics. Then, Support Vector Regression models based on the most stable metrics were fitted to assess model transferability by applying them to other datasets in four different cases: (1) ALS-ALS, (2) DAP-DAP temporal, (3) ALS-DAP and (4) ALS-DAP temporal. Some metrics were found to be enough stable in each case, so they could be used interchangeably between datasets. The application of models to other datasets resulted in unbiased predictions with relative root mean square error differences ranging from -8.27% to 14.59%. Results demonstrated that 3D-based GSV models may be transferable between point clouds of the same type as well as point clouds acquired using different technologies such as ALS and DAP, suggesting that DAP data may be used as a cost-efficient source of information for updating ALS-assisted forest inventories.

[1]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Using canopy heights from digital aerial photogrammetry to enable spatial transfer of forest attribute models: a case study in central Europe , 2017 .

[2]  Tetsuji Ota,et al.  Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Structure from Motion Approach with Aerial Photographs in a Seasonal Tropical Forest , 2015 .

[3]  Markus Hollaus,et al.  Airborne Laser Scanning of Forest Stem Volume in a Mountainous Environment , 2007, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland).

[4]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Comparing stand inventories for large areas based on photo-interpretation and laser scanning by means of cost-plus-loss analyses , 2004 .

[5]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Detection of biomass change in a Norwegian mountain forest area using small footprint airborne laser scanner data , 2013, Stat. Methods Appl..

[6]  E. Næsset Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser , 2004 .

[7]  Hernandez-Clemente Rocio,et al.  Impact of plot size and model selection on forest biomass estimation using airborne LiDAR: A case study of pine plantations in southern Spain , 2017 .

[8]  Fernando Montes-Gonzalez,et al.  Vertical forest structure analysis for wildfire prevention: Comparing airborne laser scanning data and stereoscopic hemispherical images , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[9]  A. Hudak,et al.  Transferability of Lidar-derived Basal Area and Stem Density Models within a Northern Idaho Ecoregion , 2018 .

[10]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Digital Aerial Photogrammetry for Updating Area-Based Forest Inventories: A Review of Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions , 2019, Current Forestry Reports.

[11]  L. Rodriguez,et al.  Stand volume models based on stable metrics as from multiple ALS acquisitions in Eucalyptus plantations , 2015, Annals of Forest Science.

[12]  Juan de la Riva,et al.  Temporal Transferability of Pine Forest Attributes Modeling Using Low-Density Airborne Laser Scanning Data , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Demonstrating the transferability of forest inventory attribute models derived using airborne laser scanning data , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[14]  P. Surový,et al.  Determining tree height and crown diameter from high-resolution UAV imagery , 2017 .

[15]  Luis Diaz-Balteiro,et al.  Selecting the best forest management alternative by aggregating ecosystem services indicators over time: A case study in central Spain , 2017 .

[16]  B. Koch,et al.  Non-parametric prediction and mapping of standing timber volume and biomass in a temperate forest: application of multiple optical/LiDAR-derived predictors , 2010 .

[17]  M. Maltamo,et al.  The transferability of airborne laser scanning based tree-level models between different inventory areas , 2019, Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

[18]  I. Burke,et al.  Estimating stand structure using discrete-return lidar: an example from low density, fire prone ponderosa pine forests , 2005 .

[19]  Cheng Wang,et al.  Utility of multitemporal lidar for forest and carbon monitoring: Tree growth, biomass dynamics, and carbon flux , 2018 .

[20]  Vladimir Cherkassky,et al.  The Nature Of Statistical Learning Theory , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[21]  G. Asner,et al.  Mapping tropical forest carbon: Calibrating plot estimates to a simple LiDAR metric , 2014 .

[22]  Juan de la Riva,et al.  Estimation of Total Biomass in Aleppo Pine Forest Stands Applying Parametric and Nonparametric Methods to Low-Density Airborne Laser Scanning Data , 2018 .

[23]  S. Shataee,et al.  Forest Attributes Estimation Using Aerial Laser Scanner and TM Data , 2013 .

[24]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Airborne laser scanning and digital stereo imagery measures of forest structure: comparative results and implications to forest mapping and inventory update , 2013 .

[25]  Max Kuhn,et al.  caret: Classification and Regression Training , 2015 .

[26]  G. Asner,et al.  A universal airborne LiDAR approach for tropical forest carbon mapping , 2011, Oecologia.

[27]  M. L. Guillén-Climent,et al.  Testing the quality of forest variable estimation using dense image matching: a comparison with airborne laser scanning in a Mediterranean pine forest , 2018 .

[28]  Jungho Im,et al.  Forest biomass estimation from airborne LiDAR data using machine learning approaches , 2012 .

[29]  R. Fournier,et al.  Generalizing predictive models of forest inventory attributes using an area-based approach with airborne LiDAR data , 2015 .

[30]  M. Lefsky,et al.  Comparison and integration of lidar and photogrammetric point clouds for mapping pre-fire forest structure , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[31]  Joanne C. White,et al.  The Utility of Image-Based Point Clouds for Forest Inventory: A Comparison with Airborne Laser Scanning , 2013 .

[32]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Assessing 3D point clouds from aerial photographs for species-specific forest inventories , 2017 .

[33]  Marek K. Jakubowski,et al.  Tradeoffs between lidar pulse density and forest measurement accuracy , 2013 .

[34]  E. Næsset,et al.  Value of airborne laser scanning and digital aerial , 2018 .

[35]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Comparing ALS and Image-Based Point Cloud Metrics and Modelled Forest Inventory Attributes in a Complex Coastal Forest Environment , 2015 .

[36]  E. Næsset,et al.  Comparison of four types of 3D data for timber volume estimation , 2014 .

[37]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  The effects of field plot size on model-assisted estimation of aboveground biomass change using multitemporal interferometric SAR and airborne laser scanning data , 2015 .

[38]  Ronald E. McRoberts,et al.  Estimating Forest Volume and Biomass and Their Changes Using Random Forests and Remotely Sensed Data , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[39]  R. McRoberts,et al.  Estimating and mapping forest structural diversity using airborne laser scanning data , 2015 .

[40]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Modeling and predicting aboveground biomass change in young forest using multi-temporal airborne laser scanner data , 2015 .

[41]  Alberto García-Martín,et al.  Use of low point density ALS data to estimate stand-level structural variables in Mediterranean Aleppo pine forest , 2016 .

[42]  Michael J. Falkowski,et al.  Temporal transferability of LiDAR-based imputation of forest inventory attributes , 2015 .

[43]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[44]  Petteri Packalen,et al.  Effect of flying altitude, scanning angle and scanning mode on the accuracy of ALS based forest inventory , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[45]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  A comparison of area-based forest attributes derived from airborne laser scanner, small-format and medium-format digital aerial photography , 2019, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[46]  E. Næsset,et al.  Forestry applications of airborne laser scanning : concepts and case studies , 2014 .

[47]  Jörgen Wallerman,et al.  Forest variable estimation using photogrammetric matching of digital aerial images in combination with a high-resolution DEM , 2012 .

[48]  M. Nilsson Estimation of tree heights and stand volume using an airborne lidar system , 1996 .

[49]  T. Pock,et al.  Point Clouds: Lidar versus 3D Vision , 2010 .

[50]  Johannes Schumacher,et al.  Potential of remote sensing-based forest attribute models for harmonising large-scale forest inventories on regional level: a case study in Southwest Germany , 2019, Annals of Forest Science.

[51]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[52]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Estimation of Tree Height and Stem Volume on Plots Using Airborne Laser Scanning , 2003, Forest Science.

[53]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Performance of dense digital surface models based on image matching in the estimation of plot-level forest variables , 2013 .

[54]  E. Næsset,et al.  A fine-scale model for area-based predictions of tree-size-related attributes derived from LiDAR canopy heights , 2012 .

[55]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  A new approach with DTM-independent metrics for forest growing stock prediction using UAV photogrammetric data , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[56]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Assessing effects of laser point density, ground sampling intensity, and field sample plot size on biophysical stand properties derived from airborne laser scanner data , 2008 .

[57]  S. Solberg,et al.  Forest Parameter Prediction Using an Image-Based Point Cloud: A Comparison of Semi-ITC with ABA , 2015 .

[58]  Sakari Tuominen,et al.  Forest variable estimation using a high-resolution digital surface model , 2012 .

[59]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  High spatial resolution three-dimensional mapping of vegetation spectral dynamics using computer vision , 2013 .

[60]  E. Næsset,et al.  Indirect and direct estimation of forest biomass change using forest inventory and airborne laser scanning data , 2015 .

[61]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Comparing the accuracies of forest attributes predicted from airborne laser scanning and digital aerial photogrammetry in operational forest inventories , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[62]  Joanne C. White,et al.  A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach , 2013 .

[63]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Updating residual stem volume estimates using ALS- and UAV-acquired stereo-photogrammetric point clouds , 2017 .

[64]  Txomin Hermosilla,et al.  Analysis of the Influence of Plot Size and LiDAR Density on Forest Structure Attribute Estimates , 2014 .

[65]  Lars T. Waser,et al.  Potential of UltraCamX stereo images for estimating timber volume and basal area at the plot level in mixed European forests , 2013 .

[66]  Adam J. Mathews,et al.  Assessment of Image-Based Point Cloud Products to Generate a Bare Earth Surface and Estimate Canopy Heights in a Woodland Ecosystem , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[67]  Jungho Im,et al.  ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , 2022 .

[68]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.