OM Practice - Balancing Risk and Efficiency at a Major Commercial Bank

Check processing institutions are being forced to downsize their workforce to cut cost and improve the efficiency of their operations as a result of continued growth of electronic payments, a consequence of the increasing popularity of debit/credit cards and use of online banking. For these institutions, these events are making more urgent the decision of how to staff a check-clearing house to trade off efficiency and the expected costs associated with the risks of delayed checks, which include fraud and float costs. In this paper, we discuss how a team of executives at a major commercial bank (CB) and Carnegie Mellon University students and faculty engaged in conducting a model-based study of the CB check-clearing operations. This project culminated in the development of a simulation optimization model to systematically analyze the nature of the highlighted risk efficiency trade-off at CB. The firm used the model recommendations to obtain operations downsizing guidelines for its senior managers during the implementation of a strategic workforce reduction program at their check-clearing house. The managerial insights from the team analysis, and the specific model-based recommendations, enabled CB executives to balance risk and efficiency while planning the reduction of their check-processing workforce.

[1]  Fred W. Glover,et al.  Tabu Search , 1997, Handbook of Heuristics.

[2]  Sidney W. Hess Design and Implementation of a New Check Clearing System for the Philadelphia Federal Reserve District , 1975 .

[3]  Richard C. Larson,et al.  Scheduling workforce and workflow in a high volume factory , 1997 .

[4]  R. Nauss,et al.  Optimization of Bank Transit Check Clearing Operations , 1985 .

[5]  Phil McKenzie,et al.  Shift Scheduling in Banking Operations: A Case Application , 1980 .

[6]  Rafael Martí,et al.  Scatter Search: Diseño Básico y Estrategias avanzadas , 2002, Inteligencia Artif..

[7]  George L. Nemhauser,et al.  Note--On "Location of Bank Accounts to Optimize Float: An Analytic Study of Exact and Approximate Algorithms" , 1979 .

[8]  Arthur V. Hill,et al.  CHEXPEDITE: A COMPUTER‐BASED APPROACH TO THE BANK COURIER PROBLEM , 1982 .

[9]  Frederic H. Murphy,et al.  A Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Check Sorting , 1977 .

[10]  Vincent A. Mabert,et al.  A Case Study of Encoder Shift Scheduling under Uncertainty , 1979 .

[11]  Nicola Secomandi,et al.  From Revenue Management Concepts to Software Systems , 2002, Interfaces.

[12]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation Modeling & Analysis , 1991 .

[13]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Just Modeling Through: A Rough Guide to Modeling , 1999, Interfaces.

[14]  Paulo J. Gomes,et al.  Leveraging the potential of process technology through workflow scheduling , 2002 .

[15]  George B. Kleindorfer,et al.  Strategic Planning for Bank Operations with Multiple Check-Processing Locations , 1986 .

[16]  Robert E. Markland,et al.  Improving Transit Check Clearing Operations at Maryland National Bank , 1983 .