Academics' responses to encountered information: Context matters

An increasing number of tools are being developed to help academics interact with information, but little is known about the benefits of those tools for their users. This study evaluated academics' receptiveness to information proposed by a mobile app, the SerenA Notebook: information that is based in their inferred interests but does not relate directly to a prior recognized need. The evaluated app aimed at creating the experience of serendipitous encounters: generating ideas and inspiring thoughts, and potentially triggering follow‐up actions, by providing users with suggestions related to their work and leisure interests. We studied how 20 academics interacted with messages sent by the mobile app (3 per day over 10 consecutive days). Collected data sets were analyzed using thematic analysis. We found that contextual factors (location, activity, and focus) strongly influenced their responses to messages. Academics described some unsolicited information as interesting but irrelevant when they could not make immediate use of it. They highlighted filtering information as their major struggle rather than finding information. Some messages that were positively received acted as reminders of activities participants were meant to be doing but were postponing, or were relevant to ongoing activities at the time the information was received.

[1]  Jennifer K. Phillips,et al.  A Data–Frame Theory of Sensemaking , 2007 .

[2]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[3]  Nigel Bevan,et al.  Measuring usability as quality of use , 1995, Software Quality Journal.

[4]  J. F. Kelley,et al.  An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications , 1984, TOIS.

[5]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Uncertainty-tolerant design: Evaluating task performance and drag-and-link information gathering for a news-writing task , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Ask for Information Retrieval: Part I. Background and Theory , 1997, J. Documentation.

[7]  Wayne G. Lutters,et al.  Understanding the micronote lifecycle: improving mobile support for informal note taking , 2004, CHI.

[8]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Structures and Strategies of Interdisciplinary Science , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Ruth Aylett,et al.  SerenA: A Multi-site Pervasive Agent Environment That Supports Serendipitous Discovery in Research , 2013, PAAMS.

[10]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Keeping encountered information , 2006, CACM.

[11]  Royston M. Roberts,et al.  Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science , 1989 .

[12]  Sara Jones,et al.  Supporting reflection and creative thinking by carers of older people with dementia , 2011, 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops.

[13]  Tammera M. Race,et al.  Resource Discovery Tools: Supporting Serendipity , 2012 .

[14]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  Encouraging serendipity in research: Designing technologies to support connection-making , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  P. Andel.  Anatomy of the Unsought Finding. Serendipity: Orgin, History, Domains, Traditions, Appearances, Patterns and Programmability , 1994, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[16]  Stephann Makri,et al.  Information for inspiration: Understanding architects' information seeking and use behaviors to inform design , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study , 2001, J. Documentation.

[18]  Michael Roberts,et al.  Activity-based serendipitous recommendations with the Magitti mobile leisure guide , 2008, CHI.

[19]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Brian Detlor,et al.  Information management , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[21]  Stephann Makri,et al.  Information for inspiration: Understanding architects' information seeking and use behaviors to inform design , 2010 .

[22]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Discovery is never by chance: designing for (un)serendipity , 2009, C&C '09.

[23]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Out of the bubble: serendipitous even recommendations at an urban music festival , 2012, IUI '12.

[24]  P. Pirolli,et al.  The Sensemaking Process and Leverage Points for Analyst Technology as Identified Through Cognitive Task Analysis , 2007 .

[25]  Elizabeth A. Watson,et al.  Going Fishing: Serendipity in Library and Information Science , 2008 .

[26]  David Ellis,et al.  A Behavioural Approach to Information Retrieval System Design , 1989, J. Documentation.

[27]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Models in information behaviour research , 1999, J. Documentation.

[28]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Ask for Information Retrieval: Part II. Results of a Design Study , 1982, J. Documentation.

[29]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Human–information interaction research and development , 2008 .

[30]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study , 2003, J. Documentation.

[31]  Alison Stevenson,et al.  Ambient Findability and Structured Serendipity: Enhanced Resource Discovery for Full Text Collections , 2008 .

[32]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  The bohemian bookshelf: supporting serendipitous book discoveries through information visualization , 2012, CHI.

[33]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Interacting with Information , 2010, Interacting with Information.

[34]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics , 2010 .

[35]  Andreas Forsblom,et al.  Out of the Bubble-Serendipitous Event Recommendations at an Urban Culture Festival , 2012 .

[36]  Sandra Erdelez.  Information Encountering: It's More Than Just Bumping into Information , 2005 .

[37]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Coming across information serendipitously - Part 2: A classification framework , 2012, J. Documentation.

[38]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  A user-centred mobile diary study approach to understanding serendipity in information research , 2011, Inf. Res..

[39]  Y. Braunstein,et al.  Information management , 1996 .

[40]  Diane Dallis,et al.  Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries , 2012 .

[41]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Chance Encounters in the Digital Library , 2009, ECDL.

[42]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Social serendipity: mobilizing social software , 2005, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[43]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  Designing a semantic sketchbook to create opportunities for serendipity , 2012, BCS HCI.

[44]  Arne Jönsson,et al.  Wizard of Oz studies: why and how , 1993, IUI '93.