Experimental validation of local exhaust strategies for improved IAQ in aircraft cabins

Abstract This experimental study examines the effectiveness of using local exhaust to mitigate cross-contamination within an aircraft cabin. Results of a previous computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study indicate significant improvements over conventional cabin mixing air ventilation systems with an average decrease in passenger exposure to body-emitted contaminants upwards of 60% predicted. This is accomplished through the use of localized suction orifices placed near and around the source passengers which are designed to unobtrusively ingest the individual’s thermal plume and exhaust it from the aircraft cabin before contaminants entrained in the plume can mix with the bulk air supply. To further test and validate the localized exhaust strategies already simulated through CFD, an extensive experimental tracer gas study has been conducted in a business-class cabin mockup and is presented here. Experimental results agree with earlier CFD work and show reductions in exposure to armpit-released contaminants of 30–60% using similar suction methodologies and up to 90% reduction with enhanced designs.

[1]  Zhao Zhang,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of airflow and contaminant transport in an airliner cabin mockup , 2009 .

[2]  James P Rydock.  Tracer study of proximity and recirculation effects on exposure risk in an airliner cabin. , 2004, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[3]  Yuanhui Zhang,et al.  Tracer study of airborne disease transmission in an aircraft cabin mock-up , 2006 .

[4]  Ryan K. Dygert,et al.  Mitigation of cross-contamination in an aircraft cabin via localized exhaust , 2010 .

[5]  M Dechow,et al.  Concentrations of selected contaminants in cabin air of airbus aircrafts. , 1997, Chemosphere.

[6]  M R Flynn,et al.  Capture efficiency of flanged circular local exhaust hoods. , 1986, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[7]  Yuanhui Zhang,et al.  Experimental study of ventilation effectiveness and air velocity distribution in an aircraft cabin mockup , 2008 .

[8]  J. Niu,et al.  Transient CFD simulation of the respiration process and inter-person exposure assessment , 2005, Building and Environment.

[9]  S. Kato,et al.  Study on transport characteristics of saliva droplets produced by coughing in a calm indoor environment , 2006 .

[10]  S. Hulley,et al.  Aircraft cabin air recirculation and symptoms of the common cold. , 2002, JAMA.

[11]  Wei Yan,et al.  Experimental and CFD study of unsteady airborne pollutant transport within an aircraft cabin mock-up , 2009 .

[12]  Ryan K. Dygert.  Mitigation of cross-contamination in an aircraft cabin through the use of localized exhaust , 2010 .

[13]  Jianlei Niu,et al.  Personalized Ventilation for Commercial Aircraft Cabins , 2007 .

[14]  John F. Dannenhoffer,et al.  Experimental investigation of reduced-mixing personal ventilation jets , 2009 .

[15]  Peter Strøm-Tejsen,et al.  Ozone-initiated chemistry in an occupied simulated aircraft cabin. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Tengfei Zhang,et al.  Novel air distribution systems for commercial aircraft cabins , 2007 .

[17]  D. Wyon,et al.  Factors affecting ozone removal rates in a simulated aircraft cabin environment , 2006 .

[18]  R. Huang,et al.  The capture envelope of a flanged circular hood in cross drafts. , 2001, AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[19]  Yigang Sun,et al.  Experimental characterization of airflows in aircraft cabins, Part II: Results and research recommendations. Discussion , 2005 .

[20]  J D Spengler,et al.  Air quality in aircraft , 2003 .

[21]  William W. Nazaroff,et al.  Ozone consumption and volatile byproduct formation from surface reactions with aircraft cabin materials and clothing fabrics , 2008 .