The determinants of firms' PhD recruitment to undertake R&D activities

Abstract We have analysed the determinant factors which condition firms' employment of PhDs to undertake RD nonetheless, our study has also revealed that there are additional reasons to employ PhD graduates. We have used an upstream–downstream approach of the innovation process, to establish which contingencies of this process increase the number of PhD holders in firms. We have focused on four contingencies: R&D cooperation, types of R&D activities, failures in the innovation process and key information sources to put into motion the innovation process. Results of this study have confirmed that PhD holders not only play upstream roles in the innovation process but in addition also downstream tasks undertaking knowledge exploitation activities.

[1]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[2]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Individual scientific collaborations and firm-level innovation , 2011 .

[3]  Andrew Hess,et al.  Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[4]  Ralph Katz,et al.  Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital , 2005 .

[6]  Salih Zeki Ozdemir,et al.  Vertical alliance networks: The case of university–biotechnology–pharmaceutical alliance chains , 2007 .

[7]  Jing-Wen Huang,et al.  Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance — The mediating role of knowledge management capacity , 2009 .

[8]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  PhD job market: professional trajectories and incentives during the PhD , 2000 .

[9]  L. Zucker,et al.  Star Scientists, Innovation and Regional and National Immigration , 2007 .

[10]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long-Run Impact of the Sbir Program , 1998 .

[11]  Fiona E. Murray.  The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life , 2004 .

[12]  Raghunath Singh Rao,et al.  The Fruits of Legitimacy: Why Some New Ventures Gain More from Innovation Than Others. , 2008 .

[13]  Dirk Czarnitzki,et al.  Exploring the Relationship Between Scientist Human Capital and Firm Performance: The Case of Biomedical Academic Entrepreneurs in the SBIR Program , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Workers’ mobility and patterns of knowledge diffusion: evidence from Italian data , 2010 .

[15]  Gustavo Crespi,et al.  The mobility of university inventors in Europe , 2007 .

[16]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  Intellectual capital or signal? The effects of scientists on alliance formation in knowledge-intensive industries , 2009 .

[17]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  High Stakes in High Technology: High‐Tech Market Values as Options , 2004 .

[18]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[19]  Heiko Gebauer,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning processes and combinative capabilities as determinants of strategic innovation , 2012 .

[20]  Andrew Hess,et al.  Intellectual Human Capital and the Emergence of Biotechnology: Trends and Patterns, 1974–2006 , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[21]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[22]  John E. Ettlie,et al.  The Impact of Interorganizational Manpower Flows on the Innovation Process , 1985 .

[23]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[24]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Ready to leave the ivory tower?: Academic scientists’ appeal to work in the private sector , 2012 .

[25]  Laura Cruz-Castro,et al.  The employment of PhDs in firms: trajectories, mobility and innovation , 2005 .

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[27]  Alexander Peine,et al.  When 'national innovation system' meet 'varieties of capitalism' arguments on labour qualifications: On the skill types and scientific knowledge needed for radical and incremental product innovations , 2011 .

[28]  Waverly W. Ding.  The Impact of Founders’ Professional Education Background on the Adoption of Open Science by For-Profit Biotechnology Firms , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Liliana Herrera,et al.  Mobility of public researchers, scientific knowledge transfer, and the firm's innovation process , 2010 .

[30]  David L. Deeds,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN HIGH TECHNOLOGY VENTURES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY FIRMS , 2000 .

[31]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  Labor Mobility from Academe to Commerce , 1997, Journal of Labor Economics.

[32]  Christian Zellner,et al.  The Economic Effects of Basic Research: Evidence for Embodied Knowledge Transfer via Scientists' Migration , 2003 .

[33]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Doctoral Education and Economic Development: The Flow of New Ph.D.s to Industry , 2004 .

[34]  Francesco Rentocchini,et al.  Exploring and Yet Failing Less: The Role of Exploitation and Human Capital to Foster Learning from Exploration , 2014 .

[35]  Francisco Mas-Verdú,et al.  Which firms want PhDs? An analysis of the determinants of the demand , 2012 .

[36]  Laudeline Auriol,et al.  Careers of Doctorate Holders: Employment and Mobility Patterns , 2010 .

[37]  David P. Lepak,et al.  The Human Resource Architecture: Toward a Theory of Human Capital Allocation and Development , 1999 .

[38]  L. Beesley.  Science policy in changing times: are governments poised to take full advantage of an institution in transition? , 2003 .

[39]  I. Busom,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the Effects of R&D Subsidies , 1999 .

[40]  Barak S. Aharonson,et al.  When does tapping external sources of knowledge result in knowledge integration , 2013 .

[41]  A. Agrawal.  Engaging the Inventor: Exploring Licensing Strategies for University Inventions and the Role of Latent Knowledge , 2006 .

[42]  Keld Laursen,et al.  The Importance of Sectoral Differences in the Application of Complementary HRM Practices for Innovation Performance , 2002 .

[43]  J. Masso,et al.  Support for Evolution in the Knowledge-Based Economy: Demand for PhDs in Estonia , 2009 .

[44]  Secondo Rolfo,et al.  Strategic Change of Public Research Units in Their Scientific Activity , 2008 .

[45]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  When are assets complementary? star scientists, strategic alliances, and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry , 2011 .

[46]  Jeremy Dawson,et al.  HRM as a predictor of innovation , 2006 .

[47]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Capturing Knowledge: The Location Decision of New Ph.D.s Working in Industry , 2009 .

[48]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[49]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Learning - by - Hiring: When Is Mobility More Likely to Facilitate Interfirm Knowledge Transfer? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Jean-Jacques Paul,et al.  The recruitment of researchers and the organisation of scientific activity in industry , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[51]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  Reputations for Toughness in Patent Enforcement: Implications for Knowledge Spillovers via Inventor Mobility , 2007 .

[52]  Daniel Tzabbar.  When does scientist recruitment affect technological repositioning , 2009 .

[53]  Annapoornima M. Subramanian,et al.  When birds of a feather don’t flock together: Different scientists and the roles they play in biotech R&D alliances , 2013 .

[54]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities , 2005 .

[55]  Michael Roach,et al.  A Taste for Science? PhD Scientists’ Academic Orientation and Self-Selection into Research Careers in Industry , 2010 .

[56]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Recruiting for Ideas: How Firms Exploit the Prior Inventions of New Hires , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[57]  Paula E. Stephan.  Wrapping It up in a Person: The Mobility Patterns of New PhDs , 2006, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[58]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[59]  Scott Shane,et al.  Industry changes in technology and complementary assets and the creation of high-growth firms , 2011 .

[60]  Hsing-fen Lee,et al.  Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering , 2010 .

[61]  Hiroatsu 野原 博淳 Nohara,et al.  The New Production of Young Scientists (PhDs) A Labour Market Analysis in International Perspective , 2003 .

[62]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.