论文信息 - A Tool for Studying Change in Argumentation

A Tool for Studying Change in Argumentation

In this paper, we address a new problem in the field of ar- gumentation theory: the link between two different change operations, namely addition and removal of an argument. We define two concepts of duality reflecting this link. They are used to propose new results about an operation from existing results concerning its dual operation. Finally, the propositions that are obtained are studied for characterizing the change operations.

[1] Simon Parsons,et al. Modelling dialogues using argumentation , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[2] Phan Minh Dung,et al. On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[3] Claudette Cayrol,et al. Characterizing Change in Argumentation by Using Duality Between Addition and Removal , 2012 .

[4] Guido Boella,et al. Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: attack refinement and the grounded extension , 2009, AAMAS.

[5] Claudette Cayrol,et al. Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument , 2010, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[6] Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al. Argument Theory Change Through Defeater Activation , 2010, COMMA.

[7] Li Jin,et al. Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method , 2011, Artif. Intell..

[8] Claudette Cayrol,et al. Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks , 2002, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[9] Guido Boella,et al. Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension , 2009, ECSQARU.

[10] Claudette Cayrol,et al. Change in Argumentation Systems: Exploring the Interest of Removing an Argument , 2011, SUM.

[11] Ringo Baumann,et al. Expanding Argumentation Frameworks: Enforcing and Monotonicity Results , 2010, COMMA.