Critical evaluation of a simple retention time predictor based on LogKow as a complementary tool in the identification of emerging contaminants in water.

There has been great interest in environmental analytical chemistry in developing screening methods based on liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) for emerging contaminants. Using HRMS, compound identification relies on the high mass resolving power and mass accuracy attainable by these analyzers. When dealing with wide-scope screening, retention time prediction can be a complementary tool for the identification of compounds, and can also reduce tedious data processing when several peaks appear in the extracted ion chromatograms. There are many in silico, Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationship methods available for the prediction of retention time for LC. However, most of these methods use commercial software to predict retention time based on various molecular descriptors. This paper explores the applicability and makes a critical discussion on a far simpler and cheaper approach to predict retention times by using LogKow. The predictor was based on a database of 595 compounds, their respective LogKow values and a chromatographic run time of 18min. Approximately 95% of the compounds were found within 4.0min of their actual retention times, and 70% within 2.0min. A predictor based purely on pesticides was also made, enabling 80% of these compounds to be found within 2.0min of their actual retention times. To demonstrate the utility of the predictors, they were successfully used as an additional tool in the identification of 30 commonly found emerging contaminants in water. Furthermore, a comparison was made by using different mass extraction windows to minimize the number of false positives obtained.

[1]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  Leon P Barron,et al.  Prediction of chromatographic retention time in high-resolution anti-doping screening data using artificial neural networks. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  M. Ibáñez,et al.  Quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry screening for synthetic cannabinoids in herbal blends. , 2013, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[4]  M. Mezcua,et al.  Rapid automated screening, identification and quantification of organic micro-contaminants and their main transformation products in wastewater and river waters using liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry with an accurate-mass database. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[5]  Lubertus Bijlsma,et al.  Investigation of pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs in waters by liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry , 2014 .

[6]  Ana Agüera,et al.  New trends in the analytical determination of emerging contaminants and their transformation products in environmental waters , 2013, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[7]  J. Lester,et al.  Fate of drugs during wastewater treatment , 2013 .

[8]  Lubertus Bijlsma,et al.  Rapid wide-scope screening of drugs of abuse, prescription drugs with potential for abuse and their metabolites in influent and effluent urban wastewater by ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry. , 2011, Analytica chimica acta.

[9]  S. Richardson Water analysis: emerging contaminants and current issues. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  Martin Krauss,et al.  LC–high resolution MS in environmental analysis: from target screening to the identification of unknowns , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[11]  D. Livingstone Theoretical property predictions. , 2003, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[12]  K. Héberger Quantitative structure-(chromatographic) retention relationships. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[13]  Félix Hernández,et al.  Multi-class determination of around 50 pharmaceuticals, including 26 antibiotics, in environmental and wastewater samples by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[14]  T. Croley,et al.  The Chromatographic Role in High Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Non-Targeted Analysis , 2012, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[15]  A. Tsantili-Kakoulidou,et al.  Quantitative Structure–Retention Relationships as Useful Tool to Characterize Chromatographic Systems and Their Potential to Simulate Biological Processes , 2013, Chromatographia.

[16]  René P Schwarzenbach,et al.  Identification of transformation products of organic contaminants in natural waters by computer-aided prediction and high-resolution mass spectrometry. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Igor V. Tetko,et al.  Virtual Computational Chemistry Laboratory – Design and Description , 2005, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[18]  Félix Hernández,et al.  Target and non-target screening strategies for organic contaminants, residues and illicit substances in food, environmental and human biological samples by UHPLC-QTOF-MS , 2012 .

[19]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[20]  A. Hogenboom,et al.  Accurate mass screening and identification of emerging contaminants in environmental samples by liquid chromatography-hybrid linear ion trap Orbitrap mass spectrometry. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[21]  Tania Portolés,et al.  Advancing towards universal screening for organic pollutants in waters. , 2015, Journal of hazardous materials.

[22]  Jukka Pellinen,et al.  Critical evaluation of screening techniques for emerging environmental contaminants based on accurate mass measurements with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. , 2012, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[23]  M. Ibáñez,et al.  Building an empirical mass spectra library for screening of organic pollutants by ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography/hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. , 2011, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.