A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Empirical Revenue Maximization Algorithm with Endogenous Sampling

The Empirical Revenue Maximization (ERM) is one of the most important price learning algorithms in auction design: as the literature shows it can learn approximately optimal reserve prices for revenue-maximizing auctioneers in both repeated auctions and uniform-price auctions. However, in these applications the agents who provide inputs to ERM have incentives to manipulate the inputs to lower the outputted price. We generalize the definition of an incentive-awareness measure proposed by Lavi et al (2019), to quantify the reduction of ERM's outputted price due to a change of $m\ge 1$ out of $N$ input samples, and provide specific convergence rates of this measure to zero as $N$ goes to infinity for different types of input distributions. By adopting this measure, we construct an efficient, approximately incentive-compatible, and revenue-optimal learning algorithm using ERM in repeated auctions against non-myopic bidders, and show approximate group incentive-compatibility in uniform-price auctions.

[1]  Or Sattath,et al.  Redesigning Bitcoin’s Fee Market , 2017, ACM Trans. Economics and Comput..

[2]  Yuval Peres,et al.  Perfect Bayesian Equilibria in Repeated Sales , 2014, SODA.

[3]  Yang Cai,et al.  Multi-Item Mechanisms without Item-Independence: Learnability via Robustness , 2019, EC.

[4]  Richard Cole,et al.  The sample complexity of revenue maximization , 2014, STOC.

[5]  Chenghao Guo,et al.  Settling the sample complexity of single-parameter revenue maximization , 2019, STOC.

[6]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Revenue maximization with a single sample , 2010, EC '10.

[7]  Jinyan Liu,et al.  Learning Optimal Reserve Price against Non-myopic Bidders , 2018, NeurIPS.

[8]  Anna R. Karlin,et al.  Competitive auctions , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..

[9]  Claudio Gentile,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Information Theory 1 Regret Minimization for Reserve Prices in Second-price Auctions , 2022 .

[10]  Jason D. Hartline,et al.  Sample Complexity for Non-Truthful Mechanisms , 2016, EC.

[11]  Hamid Nazerzadeh,et al.  Incentive-Compatible Learning of Reserve Prices for Repeated Auctions , 2019, WWW.

[12]  Mehryar Mohri,et al.  Learning Theory and Algorithms for revenue optimization in second price auctions with reserve , 2013, ICML.

[13]  Jacob Abernethy,et al.  Learning Auctions with Robust Incentive Guarantees , 2019, NeurIPS.

[14]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  Selling to a No-Regret Buyer , 2017, EC.

[15]  Nikhil R. Devanur,et al.  Online Auctions and Multi-scale Online Learning , 2017, EC.

[16]  Vahab Mirrokni,et al.  A Robust Non-Clairvoyant Dynamic Mechanism for Contextual Auctions , 2019, NeurIPS.

[17]  Vahab S. Mirrokni,et al.  Incentive-Aware Learning for Large Markets , 2018, WWW.

[18]  Maria-Florina Balcan,et al.  Reducing mechanism design to algorithm design via machine learning , 2007, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[19]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  An Incentive Analysis of some Bitcoin Fee Designs , 2018, ICALP.

[20]  Eric Budish,et al.  Strategy-Proofness in the Large , 2017, The Review of Economic Studies.

[21]  Adel Javanmard,et al.  Dynamic Incentive-Aware Learning: Robust Pricing in Contextual Auctions , 2018, NeurIPS.

[22]  Vahab S. Mirrokni,et al.  Optimal marketing strategies over social networks , 2008, WWW.

[23]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  On the Pseudo-Dimension of Nearly Optimal Auctions , 2015, NIPS.

[24]  Nikhil R. Devanur,et al.  The sample complexity of auctions with side information , 2015, STOC.

[25]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  The Sample Complexity of Up-to-ε Multi-Dimensional Revenue Maximization , 2018, 2018 IEEE 59th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[26]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Making the Most of Your Samples , 2014, EC.

[27]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  Repeated Sales with Multiple Strategic Buyers , 2017, EC.

[28]  Umar Syed,et al.  Learning Prices for Repeated Auctions with Strategic Buyers , 2013, NIPS.

[29]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[30]  Avrim Blum,et al.  Near-optimal online auctions , 2005, SODA '05.

[31]  Umar Syed,et al.  Repeated Contextual Auctions with Strategic Buyers , 2014, NIPS.

[32]  Moshe Babaioff,et al.  Are Two (Samples) Really Better Than One? , 2018, EC.