Subject-Object Ambiguities in German Embedded Clauses: An Across-the-Board Comparison

This paper examines the processing of embedded clauses in German which are ambiguous between a subject-before-object and an object-before-subject order. In an experiment using a speeded grammaticality judgment task, four types of locally ambiguous clauses were compared: (i) sentences involving movement of a definite noun phrase (NP), (ii) sentences involving pronoun movement, (iii) relative clauses, and (iv) embedded questions. We found that readers were consistently garden-pathed in the object-before-subject condition, regardless of sentence type. Furthermore, there were considerable differences with respect to garden-path strength. The garden-path effect was strongest for sentences involving scrambling. In addition, sentences involving pronoun movement induced more processing difficulty than embedded questions and relative clauses. We argue that our findings can be best explained within a serial processing model that acknowledges both syntactic and nonsyntactic influences on reanalysis and that can account for graded effects of garden-path strength.

[1]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Empty categories in sentence processing , 1989 .

[2]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993 .

[3]  A. Inoue,et al.  Information-paced parsing of Japanese , 1995 .

[4]  P Gorrell,et al.  Parsing theory and phrase-order variation in German V2 clauses , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[5]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  The diagnosis and cure of garden paths , 1994 .

[6]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[8]  Markus Bader,et al.  Prosodic Influences on Reading Syntactically Ambiguous Sentences , 1998 .

[9]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Processing of Locally Ambiguous Relative Clauses in German , 1995 .

[10]  Roger E. Kirk,et al.  Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). , 1995 .

[11]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence Reanalysis, and Visibility , 1998 .

[12]  Bradley L. Pritchett.  Grammatical Competence and Parsing Performance , 1992 .

[13]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[14]  C. Clifton,et al.  Comprehending Sentences with Long-Distance Dependencies , 1989 .

[15]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[16]  Paul Gorrell.  Syntax and Parsing , 1995 .

[17]  Hubert Haider,et al.  Deutsche Syntax : generativ : Vorstudien zur Theorie einer projektiven Grammatik , 1993 .

[18]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[19]  A D Friederici,et al.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Syntactic processing: Evidence from dutch , 1987 .

[21]  Michael Rochemont,et al.  Focus in Generative Grammar , 1986 .

[22]  Marica de Vincenzi,et al.  Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian , 1991 .

[23]  J. Henderson,et al.  Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  A D Friederici,et al.  Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: First-pass and second-pass parsing processes , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[25]  Michael Rochemont,et al.  Stress and Focus in English , 1983 .

[26]  A. Weinberg.  Parameters in the theory of sentence processing: Minimal Commitment theory goes east , 1993 .

[27]  Carson T. Schütze,et al.  Processing empty categories: A parallel approach , 1994 .