Hybrid Agency in Co-Configuration Work

This article maintains that a new wave in the development of the productive forces of society triggered by the revolution in information and communication technologies is taking place. Production carried out by single organizations is increasingly replaced by forms of production that are based on close long-term collaboration between specialized firms. This transition reflects the increasing importance of research and development as well as collective learning in business competition. New information and communication technologies enable new forms of distributed and collaborative knowledge creation and learning. The article explores an emerging new form of innovation-oriented inter-firm collaboration called co-configuration and the new kind of dualistic agency it seems to be calling for. In this form of collaboration the traditional boundary between producer and provider as well as the boundaries between product development, sales and maintenance within the provider organization become blurred. The article presents a case of the development of co-configuration work in the provision of optimization software for pulp production. The case shows some of the contradictions involved in this new form of collaboration and the development of a new kind of object-oriented collaborative agency mediated through a real-time information and communication technological platform and uniting two processes of continuous development.

[1]  Rafael Ramírez,et al.  Designing Interactive Strategy: From Value Chain to Value Constellation (2nd edition) , 1994 .

[2]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[3]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Essence of Distributed Work: The Case of the Linux Kernel , 2002 .

[4]  Andrew C. Boynton,et al.  The Effective Design of Work Under Total Quality Management , 2000 .

[5]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  The Product Development Challenge: Competing Through Speed, Quality, and Creativity (A Harvard Business Review Book) (Проблема создания новых продуктов: конкурируя посредством скорости, качества и креативности) , 1995 .

[6]  J. Kallinikos Work, Human Agency and Organizational Forms: An Anatomy of Fragmentation , 2003 .

[7]  Karin Knorr Cetina,et al.  Transparency regimes and management by content in global organizations. The case of institutional currency trading , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[9]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[10]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  A. Strauss,et al.  Professions in Process , 1961, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  G. Hamel,et al.  Competence-based competition , 1994 .

[13]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Interactive expertise : studies in distributed working intelligence , 1992 .

[14]  Peter B. Meyer,et al.  Episodes of Collective Invention , 2003 .

[15]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Essence of Distributed Work: The Case of the Linux Kernel , 2000, First Monday.

[16]  N. Rosenberg Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910 , 1963, The Journal of Economic History.

[17]  C. Ciborra The Platform Organization: Recombining Strategies, Structures, and Surprises , 1996 .

[18]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[19]  A. Bandura Human agency in social cognitive theory. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[20]  H. Rheinberger Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube , 1997 .

[21]  Alessandro Nuvolari,et al.  Collective Invention during the British Industrial Revolution The Case of the Cornish Pumping Engine , 2004 .

[22]  M. Callon The role of hybrid communities and socio-technical arrangements in the participatory design , 2004 .