Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification

Abstract Individual identification via non-invasive sampling is of prime importance in conservation genetics and in behavioural ecology. This approach allows for genetics studies of wild animals without having to catch them, or even to observe them. The material used as a source of DNA is usually faeces, shed hairs, or shed feathers. It has been recently shown that this material may lead to genotyping errors, mainly due to allelic dropout. In addition to these technical errors, there are problems with accurately estimating the probability of identity (PI, or the probability of two individuals having identical genotypes) because of the presence of close relatives in natural populations. As a consequence, before initiating an extensive study involving non-invasive sampling, we strongly suggest conducting a pilot study to assess both the technical difficulties and the PI for the genetic markers to be used. This pilot study could be carried out in three steps: (i) estimation of the PI using preliminary genetic data; (ii) simulations taking into account the PI and choosing the technical error rate that is sufficiently low for assessing the scientific question; (iii) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) experiments to check if it is technically possible to achieve this error rate.

[1]  M. Stoneking.  Ancient DNA: how do you know when you have it and what can you do with it? , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[2]  Maurice G. Kendall.  The advanced theory of statistics , 1958 .

[3]  P. Thompson,et al.  Molecular scatology: the use of molecular genetic analysis to assign species, sex and individual identity to seal faeces , 1997, Molecular ecology.

[4]  J. J. Moore,et al.  Kin selection, social structure, gene flow, and the evolution of chimpanzees. , 1994, Science.

[5]  D. Birch,et al.  Simplified hot start PCR , 1996, Nature.

[6]  A. Stratil,et al.  Variation of some serum proteins in red deer, Cervus elaphus L. , 1990, Animal genetics.

[7]  D. Blair,et al.  Marine mammal faeces as a source of DNA , 1996, Molecular ecology.

[8]  W. Brown,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA analyses and the origin and relative age of parthenogenetic lizards (genus Cnemidophorus). , 1979, Science.

[9]  P Taberlet,et al.  Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  J. Martin,et al.  Human beta-globin gene polymorphisms characterized in DNA extracted from ancient bones 12,000 years old. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  S. Pääbo,et al.  Conservation genetics of the European brown bear ‐ a study using excremental PCR of nuclear and mitochondrial sequences , 1995, Molecular ecology.

[12]  R. Wayne,et al.  Genetic variation of microsatellite loci in a bottlenecked species: the northern hairy‐nosed wombat Lasiorhinus krefftii , 1994, Molecular ecology.

[13]  L. Waits,et al.  Noninvasive genetic tracking of the endangered Pyrenean brown bear population , 1997, Molecular ecology.

[14]  M. Waterman,et al.  A multiple-tubes approach for accurate genotyping of very small DNA samples by using PCR: statistical considerations. , 1992, American journal of human genetics.

[15]  N. Arnheim,et al.  The polymerase chain reaction. , 1989, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[16]  M. Salimans,et al.  Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids , 1990, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[17]  K. Seeger,et al.  Advantages of a new Taq DNA polymerase in multiplex PCR and time-release PCR. , 1998, BioTechniques.

[18]  D. Tautz,et al.  Amplification of hypervariable simple sequence repeats (microsatellites) from excremental DNA of wild living bonobos (Pan paniscus) , 1995 .

[19]  R. Wayne,et al.  Estimating population size by genotyping faeces , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  R Higuchi,et al.  Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. , 2013, BioTechniques.

[21]  D. Wynford‐Thomas,et al.  The polymerase chain reaction: Miracle or mirage? A critical review of its uses and limitations in diagnosis and research , 1990, The Journal of pathology.

[22]  J. Sninsky,et al.  Recent advances in the polymerase chain reaction , 1991, Science.

[23]  C. Jaulin,et al.  Experimental limits of PCR analysis of (CA)n repeat alterations. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[24]  R. Lewontin,et al.  Twenty-five years ago in Genetics: electrophoresis in the development of evolutionary genetics: milestone or millstone? , 1991, Genetics.

[25]  C. Strobeck,et al.  Microsatellite analysis of genetic variation in black bear populations , 1994, Molecular ecology.

[26]  Michael K. Schwartz,et al.  ESTIMATING ANIMAL ABUNDANCE USING NONINVASIVE DNA SAMPLING: PROMISE AND PITFALLS , 2000 .

[27]  Christophe Boesch,et al.  Furtive mating in female chimpanzees , 1997, Nature.

[28]  K. Mullis,et al.  Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. , 1988, Science.

[29]  S. H. Forbes,et al.  Genetic Structure and Migration in Native and Reintroduced Rocky Mountain Wolf Populations , 1997 .

[30]  P. Donnelly.  Nonindependence of matches at different loci in DNA profiles: quantifying the effect of close relatives on the match probability , 1995, Heredity.

[31]  S. Kwok.  17 – PROCEDURES TO MINIMIZE PCR-PRODUCT CARRY-OVER , 1990 .

[32]  S. Pääbo,et al.  DNA extraction from Pleistocene bones by a silica-based purification method. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  P. Boag,et al.  Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses , 1991 .

[34]  S. Hummel,et al.  How Many Cycles Does a PCR need? Determinations of Cycle Numbers Depending on the Number of Targets and the Reaction Efficiency Factor , 1997, Naturwissenschaften.

[35]  J. Avise,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA clones and matriarchal phylogeny within and among geographic populations of the pocket gopher, Geomys pinetis. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  R. Wayne,et al.  Empirical evaluation of preservation methods for faecal DNA , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[37]  J. E. Marsden,et al.  Feather pulp: a non-destructive sampling technique for electrophoretic studies of birds , 1984 .

[38]  D J Balding,et al.  DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. , 1994, Forensic science international.

[39]  B. Goossens,et al.  Plucked hair samples as a source of DNA: reliability of dinucleotide microsatellite genotyping , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[40]  K. Mullis,et al.  Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. , 1985, Science.

[41]  C Boesch,et al.  Microsatellite scoring errors associated with noninvasive genotyping based on nuclear DNA amplified from shed hair , 1997, Molecular ecology.

[42]  K. Mullis,et al.  Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. , 1987, Methods in enzymology.

[43]  W. Amos,et al.  Molecular analysis of the efficiency of sloughed skin sampling in whale population genetics , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[44]  R. Wayne,et al.  Molecular genetic approaches in conservation , 1996 .

[45]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Bear conservation genetics , 1992, Nature.

[46]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism, phylogeography, and conservation genetics of the brown bear Ursus arctos in Europe , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  S. Wasser,et al.  Techniques for application of faecal DNA methods to field studies of Ursids , 1997, Molecular ecology.