Prospective phase II study of FOLFIRI for mCRC in Japan, including the analysis of UGT1A1 28/6 polymorphisms.

OBJECTIVES This is the first phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the first-line FOLFIRI, as well as the influence of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase 1, family polypeptide A1 gene (UGT1A1) 28/6 polymorphism, in Japanese metastatic colorectal cancer patients. METHODS Fifty-two patients were enrolled in this study and were administrated FOLFIRI (irinotecan; 150 mg/m(2)) as first-line chemotherapy. Thirty-nine patients accepted the evaluation of UGT1A1 genotypes. In patients with UGT1A1 28 homozygosity, the starting dose was reduced (100 mg/m(2)) according to the Food and Drug Administration recommendation and our previous phase I study. RESULTS After a median follow-up period of 22 months, complete response was achieved in 1.9%, partial response in 38.5 %, stable disease in 51.9% and progressive disease in 3.9%. The overall response rate was 40.4%, the disease control rate was 92.3% and the median overall survival time was 22.3 months. The major toxicity was grade 3-4 neutropenia in 44.2%. There was no definite relation between UGT1A1 28, 6 polymorphisms and toxicity. However, homozygosity for UGT1A1 28 or UGT1A1 6 and double heterozygosity for both UGT1A1 28 and UGT1A1 6 were significantly associated with severe neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer patients (P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS FOLFIRI is effective and tolerable for Japanese metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Homozygosity for UGT1A1 28 or 6 and heterozygosity for both UGT1A1 28 and 6 are associated with severe neutropenia.

[1]  M. Oka,et al.  Phase I study of irinotecan and doxifluridine for metastatic colorectal cancer focusing on the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism , 2010, Cancer science.

[2]  Michiko Takahashi,et al.  Clinical Significance of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*6 for Toxicities of Combination Chemotherapy with Irinotecan and Cisplatin in Gynecologic Cancers , 2009, Oncology.

[3]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  EPIC: phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Joseph G Ibrahim,et al.  UGT1A1*28 genotype and irinotecan-induced neutropenia: dose matters. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  Teruhiko Yoshida,et al.  Irinotecan pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and UGT1A genetic polymorphisms in Japanese: roles of UGT1A1*6 and *28 , 2007, Pharmacogenetics and genomics.

[6]  M. Valerio,et al.  Phase III randomized trial of FOLFIRI versus FOLFOX4 in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter study of the Gruppo Oncologico Dell'Italia Meridionale. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  M. Baiget,et al.  UGT1A1 gene variations and irinotecan treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  J. Berlin,et al.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Soma Das,et al.  Genetic variants in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene predict the risk of severe neutropenia of irinotecan. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  D. Sargent,et al.  Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  TP53 mutations in early-stage ovarian carcinoma, relation to long-term survival , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  H. Saka,et al.  Polymorphisms of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase gene and irinotecan toxicity: a pharmacogenetic analysis. , 2000, Cancer research.

[14]  C. Wilson,et al.  Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  R. James,et al.  Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial , 2000, The Lancet.

[16]  J. Lotz,et al.  CPT-11 (irinotecan) addition to bimonthly, high-dose leucovorin and bolus and continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. GERCOR. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[17]  M. Ratain,et al.  Genetic predisposition to the metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11). Role of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 in the glucuronidation of its active metabolite (SN-38) in human liver microsomes. , 1998, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[18]  C. Tournigand,et al.  Oxaliplatin with high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil 48-hour continuous infusion in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. , 1997, European journal of cancer.

[19]  M. O’connell A phase III trial of 5‐fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. A mayo clinic/north central cancer treatment group study , 1989, Cancer.

[20]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.