A Boolean Function for Neural Induction Reveals a Critical Role of Direct Intercellular Interactions in Patterning the Ectoderm of the Ascidian Embryo

A complex system of multiple signaling molecules often produce differential gene expression patterns in animal embryos. In the ascidian embryo, four signaling ligands, Ephrin-A.d (Efna.d), Fgf9/16/20, Admp, and Gdf1/3-r, coordinately induce Otx expression in the neural lineage at the 32-cell stage. However, it has not been determined whether differential inputs of all of these signaling pathways are really necessary. It is possible that differential activation of one of these signaling pathways is sufficient and the remaining signaling pathways are activated in all cells at similar levels. To address this question, we developed a parameter-free method for determining a Boolean function for Otx expression in the present study. We treated activities of signaling pathways as Boolean values, and we also took all possible patterns of signaling gradients into consideration. We successfully determined a Boolean function that explains Otx expression in the animal hemisphere of wild-type and morphant embryos at the 32-cell stage. This Boolean function was not inconsistent with three sensing patterns, which represented whether or not individual cells received sufficient amounts of the signaling molecules. These sensing patterns all indicated that differential expression of Otx in the neural lineage is primarily determined by Efna.d, but not by differential inputs of Fgf9/16/20, Admp, and Gdf1/3-r signaling. To confirm this hypothesis experimentally, we simultaneously knocked-down Admp, Gdf1/3-r, and Fgf9/16/20, and treated this triple morphant with recombinant bFGF and BMP4 proteins, which mimic Fgf9/16/20 and Admp/Gdf1/3-r activity, respectively. Although no differential inputs of Admp, Gdf1/3-r and Fgf9/16/20 signaling were expected under this experimental condition, Otx was expressed specifically in the neural lineage. Thus, direct cell–cell interactions through Efna.d play a critical role in patterning the ectoderm of the early ascidian embryo.

[1]  Delphine Dauga,et al.  Guidelines for the nomenclature of genetic elements in tunicate genomes , 2015, Genesis.

[2]  S. Higashijima,et al.  Visualization of an endogenous retinoic acid gradient across embryonic development , 2013, Nature.

[3]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  B. Fiedler,et al.  Dynamics and Control at Feedback Vertex Sets. I: Informative and Determining Nodes in Regulatory Networks , 2013, Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations.

[5]  N. Barkai,et al.  Scaling of morphogen gradients. , 2011, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[6]  C. Hudson,et al.  Ephrin-Eph signalling drives the asymmetric division of notochord/neural precursors in Ciona embryos , 2007, Development.

[7]  Delphine Dauga,et al.  The ANISEED database: digital representation, formalization, and elucidation of a chordate developmental program. , 2010, Genome research.

[8]  Clare Hudson,et al.  PII: S0925-4773(00)00528-1 , 2001 .

[9]  Y. Satou,et al.  Multiple Signaling Pathways Coordinate to Induce a Threshold Response in a Chordate Embryo , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[10]  L. Wolpert Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  A. Mochizuki,et al.  Analyzing steady states of dynamics of bio-molecules from the structure of regulatory networks. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Ron Piran,et al.  Algorithm of myogenic differentiation in higher-order organisms , 2009, Development.

[13]  M. Levine,et al.  p120RasGAP mediates ephrin/Eph-dependent attenuation of FGF/ERK signals during cell fate specification in ascidian embryos , 2013, Development.

[14]  Vincent Bertrand,et al.  Neural Tissue in Ascidian Embryos Is Induced by FGF9/16/20, Acting via a Combination of Maternal GATA and Ets Transcription Factors , 2003, Cell.

[15]  Guy Karlebach,et al.  Modelling and analysis of gene regulatory networks , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[16]  M. Nahmad,et al.  Spatiotemporal mechanisms of morphogen gradient interpretation. , 2011, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[17]  J. Rossant,et al.  Intercellular interactions, position, and polarity in establishing blastocyst cell lineages and embryonic axes. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[18]  P. Lemaire,et al.  A Quantitative Approach to the Study of Cell Shapes and Interactions during Early Chordate Embryogenesis , 2006, Current Biology.

[19]  Kazuhiro Chida,et al.  Polarity-Dependent Distribution of Angiomotin Localizes Hippo Signaling in Preimplantation Embryos , 2013, Current Biology.

[20]  C. Tomlin,et al.  Biology by numbers: mathematical modelling in developmental biology , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[21]  B. Fiedler,et al.  Dynamics and control at feedback vertex sets. II: a faithful monitor to determine the diversity of molecular activities in regulatory networks. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  Yutaka Satou,et al.  Gene expression profiles of transcription factors and signaling molecules in the ascidian embryo: towards a comprehensive understanding of gene networks , 2004, Development.