Frequency and lexical specificity in grammar: A critical review

It is a central assumption of usage-based linguistics that syntactic structures, i.e. constructions, are stored and processed at different levels of abstractness and that lowerlevel constructions are associated with particular lexemes. There is evidence from a wide range of studies that the language user’s knowledge of constructions includes detailed information about specific words, which influences sentence comprehension and production and diachronic language change. The current paper provides an overview of this research and considers the cognitive mechanisms that underlie the emergence of lexically particular constructions. Researchers agree that frequency affects the interaction between lexemes and constructions; but the cognitive effects of frequency on lexical specificity are not yet fully understood. Some usage-based linguists have argued that the exemplar mechanism of category learning accounts for the redundant storage of lexically particular constructions alongside more general, i.e. schematic syntactic representations; but the current paper argues that the exemplar model needs to be augmented by a linear processing mechanism, i.e. automatization, in order to explain how lexemes and constructions are related. 1 I would like to thank Heike Behrens and Karin Madlener for helpful comments and suggestions.

[1]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Admitting that admitting verb sense into corpus analyses makes sense , 2004 .

[2]  E. Newport,et al.  Science Current Directions in Psychological Statistical Learning : from Acquiring Specific Items to Forming General Rules on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[3]  W. Charters Constructing a Language and Grammar Scale , 1920 .

[4]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  Statistical Learning of Syntax: The Role of Transitional Probability , 2007 .

[5]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. , 1999, Science.

[6]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  A Usage‐Based Account of Constituency and Reanalysis , 2009 .

[7]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don't in English , 1999 .

[8]  A. Pawley,et al.  Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency , 2014 .

[9]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[10]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  A usage-based model , 1988 .

[11]  R. Nosofsky Exemplars, prototypes, and similarity rules. , 1992 .

[12]  B. Erman,et al.  The idiom principle and the open choice principle , 2000 .

[13]  E. Newport,et al.  WORD SEGMENTATION : THE ROLE OF DISTRIBUTIONAL CUES , 1996 .

[14]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation , 2001 .

[15]  A. Goldberg,et al.  The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions , 2004 .

[16]  M. Krug Emerging English modals : a corpus-based study of grammaticalization , 2000 .

[17]  Barry K. Rosen,et al.  Syntactic Complexity , 1974, Inf. Control..

[18]  E. Beniers Joan L. Bybee, Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form , amsterdam y Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 1985 , 2013 .

[19]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Working Memory Capacity , 2005 .

[20]  Melissa Bowerman,et al.  Early Syntactic Development: A Cross-Linguistic Study with Special Reference to Finnish , 1973 .

[21]  Alison Wray Formulaic Language and the Lexicon: Formulaic Language and the Lexicon , 2002 .

[22]  J. Trueswell THE ROLE OF LEXICAL FREQUENCY IN SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION , 1996 .

[23]  Dagmar Divjak,et al.  Frequency effects in language learning and processing , 2012 .

[24]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Sequencing in SLA , 1996, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[25]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[26]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[27]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[28]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[29]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[30]  Joan L. Bybee 4. Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure , 2002 .

[31]  R. Gómez,et al.  Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge , 1999, Cognition.

[32]  Holger Diessel,et al.  Construction Grammar and First Language Acquisition , 2013 .

[33]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Language, Usage and Cognition , 2010 .

[34]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[35]  John Sinclair,et al.  Corpus, Concordance, Collocation , 1991 .

[36]  Dan Jurafsky,et al.  Probabilistic Modeling in Psycholinguistics: Linguistic Comprehension and Production , 2006 .

[37]  PAUL IBBOTSON,et al.  Prototype constructions in early language acquisition , 2009, Language and Cognition.

[38]  M. Tomasello First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development , 1994 .

[39]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language , 2006 .

[40]  Yunheng Ji MORPHOLOGY , 1937, A Grammar of Italian Sign Language (LIS).

[41]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[42]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  First Language Acquisition , 2002, The Study of Language.

[43]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Phonological Memory, Chunking, and Points of Order , 1996 .

[44]  Joan L. Bybee Phonology and Language Use , 2004, Phonetica.

[45]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[46]  M. Tomasello Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 2003 .

[47]  Melissa Bowerman,et al.  The Acquisition of Complex Sentences: Conclusion , 2004 .

[48]  A. Goldberg The nature of generalization in language , 2009 .

[49]  D. Gary Miller,et al.  1. Theoretical Prerequisites , 1994 .

[50]  John R. Anderson Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[51]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition , 2007 .

[52]  M. Tanenhaus Afterword The impact of “The cognitive basis for linguistic structures” , 2013 .

[53]  H. Diessel Grammaticalization and language acquisition , 2011 .

[54]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Concepts and categories: Memory, meaning, and metaphysics , 2012 .

[55]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[56]  Martin Hilpert,et al.  Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax , 2013 .

[57]  Holger Diessel Verb-First Constructions in German , 1997 .

[58]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[59]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[60]  I. Sag,et al.  Idioms , 2015 .

[61]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[62]  LouAnn Gerken,et al.  Decisions, decisions: infant language learning when multiple generalizations are possible , 2006, Cognition.

[63]  Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al.  Constructionalization and Constructional Changes , 2014 .

[64]  M. Tomasello Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.

[65]  Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir,et al.  Language Change and Language Acquisition , 2003 .

[66]  Elisabeth Rieken Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective , 2009 .

[67]  Ewa Dabrowska,et al.  Words as constructions , 2009 .

[68]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[69]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Constructions at Work , 2005 .

[70]  Safa R. Zaki,et al.  Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[71]  J. Pine,et al.  Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[72]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[73]  Bybee and Hopper, eds.: Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2004 .

[74]  Anna Siewierska,et al.  Ditransitive clauses in English with special reference to Lancashire dialect , 2007 .

[75]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints , 1995, Cognition.

[76]  Douglas Roland,et al.  Verb Sense and Verb Subcategorization Probabilities , 2001 .

[77]  Franziska Frankfurter,et al.  Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure: Adele E. Goldberg, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1995. xi + 265 pp , 1998 .

[78]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  Three Frequency Effects in Syntax , 1997 .

[79]  R. Nosofsky Similarity, frequency, and category representations. , 1988 .

[80]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[81]  A. Goldberg Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[82]  Daniel Wiechmann,et al.  Initial parsing decisions and lexical bias: Corpus evidence from local NP/S-ambiguities , 2008 .

[83]  Gunnel Tottie,et al.  Lexical diffusion in syntactic change: frequency as a determinant of linguistic conservatism in the development of negation in English , 1991 .

[84]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Early syntactic creativity: a usage-based approach. , 2003, Journal of child language.

[85]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction , 2008 .

[86]  Barbara B. Levin,et al.  English verb classes and alternations , 1993 .

[87]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[88]  Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn,et al.  Topics in cognitive linguistics , 1988 .

[89]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Constraint Satisfaction Accounts of Lexical and Sentence Comprehension , 2006 .

[90]  M. Braine Children's First Word Combinations. , 1976 .

[91]  Lois Bloom,et al.  One Word at a Time: The Use of Single Word Utterances Before Syntax , 1976 .

[92]  Tony McEnery,et al.  Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice , 1996 .

[93]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[94]  Kirsten Abbot-Smith,et al.  Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition , 2006 .

[95]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Book Reviews: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1999, CL.

[96]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Knowledge of Grammar, Knowledge of Usage: Syntactic Probabilities Affect Pronunciation Variation , 2004 .

[97]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[98]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint , 2012 .

[99]  김두식,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations , 2006 .

[100]  H. Diessel Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change , 2007 .

[101]  Jason M. Brenier,et al.  Predictability Effects on Durations of Content and Function Words in Conversational English , 2009 .