Network frailty and the geometry of herd immunity

The spread of infectious disease through communities depends fundamentally on the underlying patterns of contacts between individuals. Generally, the more contacts one individual has, the more vulnerable they are to infection during an epidemic. Thus, outbreaks disproportionately impact the most highly connected demographics. Epidemics can then lead, through immunization or removal of individuals, to sparser networks that are more resistant to future transmission of a given disease. Using several classes of contact networks—Poisson, scale-free and small-world—we characterize the structural evolution of a network due to an epidemic in terms of frailty (the degree to which highly connected individuals are more vulnerable to infection) and interference (the extent to which the epidemic cuts off connectivity among the susceptible population that remains following an epidemic). The evolution of the susceptible network over the course of an epidemic differs among the classes of networks; frailty, relative to interference, accounts for an increasing component of network evolution on networks with greater variance in contacts. The result is that immunization due to prior epidemics can provide greater community protection than random vaccination on networks with heterogeneous contact patterns, while the reverse is true for highly structured populations.

[1]  Joakim Hjältén,et al.  Truncated power laws: a tool for understanding aggregation patterns in animals? , 2000 .

[2]  M. Newman.  Spread of epidemic disease on networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  P. Kaye.  Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control , 1993 .

[4]  Mel Krajden,et al.  Modeling Control Strategies of Respiratory Pathogens , 2005, Emerging infectious diseases.

[5]  M. Newman,et al.  Scaling and percolation in the small-world network model. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[6]  M. Keeling.  The implications of network structure for epidemic dynamics. , 2005, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  E Bonabeau,et al.  Scaling in animal group-size distributions. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  R. M. May,et al.  Immunisation and herd immunity , 1990, The Lancet.

[9]  Philip Hougaard,et al.  Life table methods for heterogeneous populations: Distributions describing the heterogeneity , 1984 .

[10]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[11]  M. Newman,et al.  Network theory and SARS: predicting outbreak diversity , 2004, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[12]  M. Newman,et al.  Epidemics and percolation in small-world networks. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[13]  H. McCallum,et al.  How should pathogen transmission be modelled? , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[15]  P. Blanchard,et al.  Epidemic spreading in a variety of scale free networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  S H Strogatz,et al.  Random graph models of social networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Reka Albert,et al.  Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks , 1999 .

[18]  E. Volz,et al.  Random networks with tunable degree distribution and clustering. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Dynamical Patterns of Epidemic Outbreaks in Complex Heterogeneous Networks , 1999 .

[20]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[21]  N. Bailey.  The mathematical theory of epidemics , 1957 .

[22]  M. Newman.  Threshold effects for two pathogens spreading on a network. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[23]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.