E-government implementation challenges at local level: a comparative study of government and citizens' perspectives

In this paper, we compare and contrast the issues facing citizens with those faced by managers responsible for e-government implementation. We report the findings of a case study of e-government implementation undertaken recently at a local government authority in the UK. We use the design-reality gap analysis framework based on seven 'ITPOSMO' dimensions proposed by Heeks. Our findings indicate that the success of e-government at local level requires a strong partnership between local government and citizens. The study results point to the lack of clear strategy at local authorities' level for changing the way the government interacts with citizens.

[1]  Donald P. Moynihan,et al.  Building Secure Elections: E-Voting, Security, and Systems Theory , 2004 .

[2]  Xueli Huang,et al.  Success at E-Governing: A Case Study of ESDLife in Hong Kong , 2002, Electron. Mark..

[3]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An evaluative framework for analysing e-government convergence capability in developing countries , 2004, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[5]  Jin-Wan Seo,et al.  E-government in South Korea: planning and implementation , 2005, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[6]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  Realising e-government in the UK: rural and urban challenges , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[7]  Kostas S. Metaxiotis,et al.  E-government: new concept, big challenge, success stories , 2004, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[8]  Lynette I. Millett,et al.  Authentication, Privacy, and the Federal E-Government , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[9]  Maria Wimmer,et al.  Integrated Service Modeling for Online One-stop Government , 2002, Electron. Mark..

[10]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  E-government adoption: A cultural comparison , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[11]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Technical and organisational challenges facing transactional e-government systems: an empirical study , 2005, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[13]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT AS A GUIDED EVOLUTION IN SINGAPORE: VISION FOR THE WORLD IN THE 21ST CENTURY. , 2005 .

[14]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[15]  Gregory Streib,et al.  Citizen Demand for Interactive E-Government , 2006 .

[16]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Benchmarking the benefits and barriers of application integration , 2001 .

[17]  Zahir Irani,et al.  E-government adoption: architecture and barriers , 2005, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[18]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..