Predicted Auxiliary Navigation Mechanism of Peritrichously Flagellated Chemotactic Bacteria

Chemotactic movement of Escherichia coli is one of the most thoroughly studied paradigms of simple behavior. Due to significant competitive advantage conferred by chemotaxis and to high evolution rates in bacteria, the chemotaxis system is expected to be strongly optimized. Bacteria follow gradients by performing temporal comparisons of chemoeffector concentrations along their runs, a strategy which is most efficient given their size and swimming speed. Concentration differences are detected by a sensory system and transmitted to modulate rotation of flagellar motors, decreasing the probability of a tumble and reorientation if the perceived concentration change during a run is positive. Such regulation of tumble probability is of itself sufficient to explain chemotactic drift of a population up the gradient, and is commonly assumed to be the only navigation mechanism of chemotactic E. coli. Here we use computer simulations to predict existence of an additional mechanism of gradient navigation in E. coli. Based on the experimentally observed dependence of cell tumbling angle on the number of switching motors, we suggest that not only the tumbling probability but also the degree of reorientation during a tumble depend on the swimming direction along the gradient. Although the difference in mean tumbling angles up and down the gradient predicted by our model is small, it results in a dramatic enhancement of the cellular drift velocity along the gradient. We thus demonstrate a new level of optimization in E. coli chemotaxis, which arises from the switching of several flagellar motors and a resulting fine tuning of tumbling angle. Similar strategy is likely to be used by other peritrichously flagellated bacteria, and indicates yet another level of evolutionary development of bacterial chemotaxis.

[1]  R. Firtel,et al.  Signaling pathways controlling cell polarity and chemotaxis. , 2001, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[2]  H. Berg,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by Three-dimensional Tracking , 1972, Nature.

[3]  H. Berg,et al.  Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  H. Berg Random Walks in Biology , 2018 .

[5]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli: A Molecular Model for Robust Precise Adaptation , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  Y. Tu,et al.  Effects of receptor interaction in bacterial chemotaxis. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[7]  James G. Mitchell The influence of cell size on marine bacterial motility and energetics , 1991, Microbial Ecology.

[8]  D. Lauffenburger Quantitative studies of bacterial chemotaxis and microbial population dynamics , 1991, Microbial Ecology.

[9]  R C Stewart,et al.  Rapid phosphotransfer to CheY from a CheA protein lacking the CheY-binding domain. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[10]  H. Berg,et al.  Functional interactions between receptors in bacterial chemotaxis , 2004, Nature.

[11]  Nikita Vladimirov,et al.  Dependence of Bacterial Chemotaxis on Gradient Shape and Adaptation Rate , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  P. Cluzel,et al.  Relationship between cellular response and behavioral variability in bacterial chemotaxis , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  H. Berg,et al.  Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Monica L. Skoge,et al.  Receptor-receptor coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: evidence for strongly coupled clusters. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[15]  Howard C. Berg,et al.  On Torque and Tumbling in Swimming Escherichia coli , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  U. Alon,et al.  Computerized analysis of chemotaxis at different stages of bacterial growth. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[17]  Pablo A. Iglesias,et al.  Optimal Noise Filtering in the Chemotactic Response of Escherichia coli , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  William S. Ryu,et al.  Real-Time Imaging of Fluorescent Flagellar Filaments , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[19]  J. Timmer,et al.  Design principles of a bacterial signalling network , 2005, Nature.

[20]  H. Berg,et al.  Physics of chemoreception. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[21]  F D Williams,et al.  Survival value of chemotaxis in mixed cultures. , 1976, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[22]  H. Berg,et al.  Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  M. J. Kennedy,et al.  Role of Motility, Chemotaxis, and Adhesion in Microbial Ecology , 1987, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  H. Berg,et al.  Binding of the Escherichia coli response regulator CheY to its target measured in vivo by fluorescence resonance energy transfer , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Monica L. Skoge,et al.  Chemosensing in Escherichia coli: two regimes of two-state receptors. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  W. Bialek,et al.  Physical limits to biochemical signaling. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Ellen S. Vitetta,et al.  An allosteric model for heterogeneous receptor complexes : Understanding bacterial chemotaxis responses to multiple stimuli , 2006 .

[28]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Effect of bacterial chemotaxis on dynamics of microbial competition , 1988, Microbial Ecology.

[29]  S. Leibler,et al.  An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. , 2000, Science.

[30]  P. Cummings,et al.  The global turning probability density function for motile bacteria and its applications. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Accuracy of direct gradient sensing by single cells , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Precise adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through “assistance neighborhoods” , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  R. Freter,et al.  Adhesion and chemotaxis as determinants of bacterial association with mucosal surfaces. , 1978, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[34]  M. J. Kennedy,et al.  Role of Chemotaxis in the Ecology of Denitrifiers , 1985, Applied and environmental microbiology.