Why Protest?. Public Behavioral and Attitudinal Response to Siting a Waste Disposal Facility

[1]  A. Mushkatel,et al.  Public Opposition To The Siting Of The High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository: The Importance Of Trust , 1991 .

[2]  R. Fazio,et al.  Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association , 1982 .

[3]  Douglas J. Lober,et al.  MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE POLICY AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN HOUSEHOLD SOURCE REDUCTION , 1996 .

[4]  Owen J. Furuseth,et al.  Community response to a municipal waste incinerator: NIMBY or neighbor? , 1991 .

[5]  K. Bachrach,et al.  Coping with a community stressor: the threat of a hazardous waste facility. , 1985, Journal of health and social behavior.

[6]  Douglas J. Lober,et al.  Resolving the Siting Impasse: Modeling social and Environmental Locational Criteria with a Geographic Information System , 1995 .

[7]  Arthur H. Miller,et al.  Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970 , 1974, American Political Science Review.

[8]  D. Green,et al.  Who Protests: Self-Interest and White Opposition to Busing , 1992, The Journal of Politics.

[9]  H. Bacot,et al.  Managing the Solid Waste Crisis , 1994 .

[10]  Karl-Dieter Opp,et al.  Rational Choice and Rebellious Collective Action , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[11]  J. Hamilton Politics and Social Costs: Estimating the Impact of Collective Action on Hazardous Waste Facilities , 1993 .

[12]  M. Zanna,et al.  Direct Experience And Attitude-Behavior Consistency , 1981 .

[13]  I. Crespi WHAT KINDS OF ATTITUDE MEASURES ARE PREDICTIVE OF BEHAVIOR , 1971 .

[14]  R. Weiss,et al.  Comparative test of positive control, negative control, and social power theories of identificatory learning in disadvantaged children. , 1974 .

[15]  M. Kraft,et al.  Citizen Participation and the Nimby Syndrome: Public Response to Radioactive Waste Disposal , 1991 .

[16]  Hans Peter Peters,et al.  Information Needs Concerning a Planned Waste Incineration Facility , 1991 .

[17]  D. Lober Beyond self‐interest: a model of public attitudes towards waste facility siting , 1993 .

[18]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[19]  C. E. Davis Public Involvement in Hazardous Waste Siting Decisions , 1986, Polity.

[20]  R. LaPiere Attitudes vs Actions. 1934. , 1934, International journal of epidemiology.

[21]  D. Easterling,et al.  Fair rules for siting a high-level nuclear waste repository , 1992 .

[22]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  How Close Is Close Enough: Public Perceptions of the Risks of Industrial Facilities , 1983 .

[23]  D. Green,et al.  NIMBY or NIABY: a logit model of opposition to solid-waste-disposal facility siting , 1994 .

[24]  F. Frankena Defeat of a wood‐fired electric power plant: A study in social change∗ , 1988 .

[25]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High‐Level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model , 1992 .

[26]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  Alternative Contexts of Political Behavior: Churches, Neighborhoods, and Individuals , 1993, The Journal of Politics.

[27]  Lillie Craig Trimble What Do Citizens Want in Siting of Waste Management Facilities , 1988 .

[28]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence , 1980 .

[29]  A. Wandersman,et al.  Fear of cancer and knowledge of cancer: a review and proposed relevance to hazardous waste sites. , 1990, Social science & medicine.

[30]  A. W. Wicker Attitudes Versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavioral Responses to Attitude Objects. , 1969 .

[31]  B. A. Williams,et al.  KNOWLEDGE VS. NIMBY: ASSESSING FLORIDA'S STRATEGY FOR SITING HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES , 1985 .

[32]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[33]  Paul Mohai,et al.  Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism , 1992 .

[34]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Siting noxious facilities: A test of the Facility Siting Credo , 1993 .

[35]  D. T. Vernon,et al.  Specificity of the attitude as a determinant of attitude-behavior congruence. , 1974 .

[36]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[37]  R. Cole,et al.  The Public Hearing as an Effective Citizen Participation Mechanism: A Case Study of the General Revenue Sharing Program , 1984, American Political Science Review.

[38]  T. Tyler,et al.  Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[39]  P Slovic,et al.  Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of Nuclear Waste , 1991, Science.

[40]  H. Blalock,et al.  Contextual-Effects Models: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 1984 .

[41]  A. Wandersman,et al.  The importance of neighbors: The social, cognitive, and affective components of neighboring , 1985 .

[42]  Thomas A. Heberlein,et al.  Attitudinal specificity and the prediction of behavior in a field setting. , 1976 .

[43]  D. Kinder,et al.  Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting , 1979 .