Influence of adaptive mesh refinement and the hydro solver on shear-induced mass stripping in a minor-merger scenario

Abstract We compare two different codes for simulations of cosmological structure formation to investigate the sensitivity of hydrodynamical instabilities to numerics, in particular, the hydro solver and the application of adaptive mesh refinement (AMR). As a simple test problem, we consider an initially spherical gas cloud in a wind, which is an idealized model for the merger of a subcluster or galaxy with a big cluster. Based on an entropy criterion, we calculate the mass stripping from the subcluster as a function of time. Moreover, the turbulent velocity field is analyzed with a multi-scale filtering technique. We find remarkable differences between the commonly used PPM solver with directional splitting in the Enzo code and an unsplit variant of PPM in the Nyx code, which demonstrates that different codes can converge to systematically different solutions even when using uniform grids. For the test case of an unbound cloud, AMR simulations reproduce uniform-grid results for the mass stripping quite well, although the flow realizations can differ substantially. If the cloud is bound by a static gravitational potential, however, we find strong sensitivity to spurious fluctuations which are induced at the cutoff radius of the potential and amplified by the bow shock. This gives rise to substantial deviations between uniform-grid and AMR runs performed with Enzo , while the mass stripping in Nyx simulations of the subcluster is nearly independent of numerical resolution and AMR. Although many factors related to numerics are involved, our study indicates that unsplit solvers with advanced flux limiters help to reduce grid effects and to keep numerical noise under control, which is important for hydrodynamical instabilities and turbulent flows.

[1]  W. Schmidt,et al.  Turbulence production and turbulent pressure support in the intergalactic medium , 2011, 1102.3352.

[2]  M. Markevitch Intergalactic shock fronts , 2010, 1010.3660.

[3]  M. Markevitch,et al.  ON THE CONNECTION BETWEEN GIANT RADIO HALOS AND CLUSTER MERGERS , 2010, 1008.3624.

[4]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Fundamental differences between SPH and grid methods , 2006, astro-ph/0610051.

[5]  P. Hopkins A new class of accurate, mesh-free hydrodynamic simulation methods , 2014, 1409.7395.

[6]  George W. Smith Molecular Structures and Motions in Solid Hexamethylethane by Proton Magnetic Resonance , 1971 .

[7]  R. Kraft,et al.  STRIPPED ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES AS PROBES OF ICM PHYSICS. II. STIRRED, BUT MIXED? VISCOUS AND INVISCID GAS STRIPPING OF THE VIRGO ELLIPTICAL M89 , 2014, 1409.6312.

[8]  Garching,et al.  Hydrodynamical simulations of cluster formation with central AGN heating , 2005, astro-ph/0509506.

[9]  Off-Center Collisions Between Clusters of Galaxies , 1997, astro-ph/9710153.

[10]  E. Toro Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics , 1997 .

[11]  W. Forman,et al.  Ram pressure stripping and the formation of cold fronts , 2003, astro-ph/0308131.

[12]  P. Colella,et al.  A conservative three-dimensional Eulerian method for coupled solid-fluid shock capturing , 2002 .

[13]  Frazer R. Pearce,et al.  Modelling shock heating in cluster mergers – I. Moving beyond the spherical accretion model , 2007 .

[14]  M. Bruggen,et al.  Magnetic field amplification by shocks in galaxy clusters: application to radio relics , 2012, 1204.2455.

[15]  W. Schmidt,et al.  ADAPTIVELY REFINED LARGE EDDY SIMULATIONS OF A GALAXY CLUSTER: TURBULENCE MODELING AND THE PHYSICS OF THE INTRACLUSTER MEDIUM , 2009 .

[16]  G. Bryan,et al.  Cluster Turbulence , 1998, astro-ph/9802335.

[17]  G. Bryan,et al.  Introducing Enzo, an AMR Cosmology Application , 2004, astro-ph/0403044.

[18]  P. Woodward,et al.  The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for Gas Dynamical Simulations , 1984 .

[19]  Nmsu,et al.  The Observational Consequences of Merging Clusters of Galaxies , 1996, astro-ph/9608102.

[20]  S. Oh,et al.  Disentangling resonant scattering and gas motions in galaxy cluster emission line profiles , 2012, 1211.2375.

[21]  Sebastian Heinz,et al.  Evolution of X-ray cavities , 2009, 0902.4242.

[22]  J. Niemeyer,et al.  Hydrodynamical adaptive mesh refinement simulations of turbulent flows -II. Cosmological simulations of galaxy clusters , 2008, 0801.4729.

[23]  L. Dursi,et al.  Draping of Cluster Magnetic Fields over Bullets and Bubbles—Morphology and Dynamic Effects , 2007, 0711.0213.

[24]  S. Paltani,et al.  The stripping of a galaxy group diving into the massive cluster A2142 , 2014, 1408.1394.

[25]  Sebastian Kern,et al.  Numerical simulations of compressively driven interstellar turbulence. I. Isothermal gas , 2008, 0809.1321.

[26]  The answer is blowing in the wind: simulating the interaction of jets with dynamic cluster atmospheres , 2006, astro-ph/0606664.

[27]  W. Schmidt,et al.  Hydrodynamical adaptive mesh refinement simulations of turbulent flows - I. Substructure in a wind , 2008, 0801.4695.

[28]  M. Norman,et al.  yt: A MULTI-CODE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT FOR ASTROPHYSICAL SIMULATION DATA , 2010, 1011.3514.

[29]  M. Ruszkowski,et al.  Galaxy motions, turbulence and conduction in clusters of galaxies , 2010, 1008.5016.

[30]  F. Vazza,et al.  Turbulence in the ICM from mergers, cool-core sloshing, and jets: results from a new multi-scale filtering approach , 2012, 1202.5882.

[31]  K. Subramanian,et al.  Evolving turbulence and magnetic fields in galaxy clusters , 2005, astro-ph/0505144.

[32]  C. McNally,et al.  A WELL-POSED KELVIN–HELMHOLTZ INSTABILITY TEST AND COMPARISON , 2011, 1111.1764.

[33]  A. S. Almgren,et al.  MAESTRO: AN ADAPTIVE LOW MACH NUMBER HYDRODYNAMICS ALGORITHM FOR STELLAR FLOWS , 2010, 1005.0112.

[34]  F. Miniati THE MATRYOSHKA RUN: A EULERIAN REFINEMENT STRATEGY TO STUDY THE STATISTICS OF TURBULENCE IN VIRIALIZED COSMIC STRUCTURES , 2013, 1310.2951.

[35]  R. Kraft,et al.  STRIPPED ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES AS PROBES OF ICM PHYSICS. I. TAILS, WAKES, AND FLOW PATTERNS IN AND AROUND STRIPPED ELLIPTICALS , 2014, 1409.6300.

[36]  H. Guillard,et al.  On the behaviour of upwind schemes in the low Mach number limit , 1999 .

[37]  W. Schmidt Numerical Modelling of Astrophysical Turbulence , 2013 .

[38]  Devin W. Silvia,et al.  ENZO: AN ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT CODE FOR ASTROPHYSICS , 2013, J. Open Source Softw..

[39]  Klaus Dolag,et al.  Investigating the velocity structure and X-ray observable properties of simulated galaxy clusters with PHOX , 2012, 1210.4158.

[40]  R. Brunino,et al.  Massive and refined - II. The statistical properties of turbulent motions in massive galaxy clusters with high spatial resolution , 2010, 1010.5950.

[41]  A. Kritsuk,et al.  Local support against gravity in magnetoturbulent fluids , 2013, 1302.4292.

[42]  Jean M. Sexton,et al.  Nyx: A MASSIVELY PARALLEL AMR CODE FOR COMPUTATIONAL COSMOLOGY , 2013, J. Open Source Softw..

[43]  Alexey Vikhlinin,et al.  Shocks and cold fronts in galaxy clusters , 2007, astro-ph/0701821.

[44]  V. Springel,et al.  On the width of cold fronts in clusters of galaxies due to conduction , 2007, 0706.0055.

[45]  Hydrodynamic Simulations of a Moving Substructure in a Cluster of Galaxies: Cold Fronts and Turbulence Generation , 2005, astro-ph/0505274.

[46]  L. H. Howell,et al.  CASTRO: A NEW COMPRESSIBLE ASTROPHYSICAL SOLVER. I. HYDRODYNAMICS AND SELF-GRAVITY , 2010, 1005.0114.

[47]  M. Donahue,et al.  The bow shock, cold fronts and disintegrating cool core in the merging galaxy group RX J0751.3+5012 , 2014, 1407.5791.

[48]  Daisuke Nagai,et al.  RESIDUAL GAS MOTIONS IN THE INTRACLUSTER MEDIUM AND BIAS IN HYDROSTATIC MEASUREMENTS OF MASS PROFILES OF CLUSTERS , 2009, 0903.4895.

[49]  K. Mannheim,et al.  EVOLUTION OF SHOCKS AND TURBULENCE IN MAJOR CLUSTER MERGERS , 2010, 1001.1170.

[50]  T. Jones,et al.  COSMIC RAYS IN GALAXY CLUSTERS AND THEIR NONTHERMAL EMISSION , 2014, 1401.7519.

[51]  R. Matsumoto,et al.  Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Cold Fronts in Magnetically Turbulent ICM , 2007, astro-ph/0703536.

[52]  Heating and Turbulence Driving by Galaxy Motions in Galaxy Clusters , 2007, 0707.4330.

[53]  H. Guillard,et al.  On the behavior of upwind schemes in the low Mach number limit: II. Godunov type schemes , 2004 .

[54]  Daniel J. Price,et al.  Modelling shear flows with smoothed particle hydrodynamics and grid‐based methods , 2010 .

[55]  P. Ricker,et al.  Off-Axis Cluster Mergers: Effects of a Strongly Peaked Dark Matter Profile , 2001, astro-ph/0107210.