Demand forecasting for new local rail stations and services

Passenger rail services in Britain are undergoing something of a revival. Since 1970 about 200 new stations have been opened on publicly owned railways in Britain, and British Rail (BR) have developed a number of new services. Before a new service or a new station can be evaluated a key question has to be posed: how many people will use it? An immediate problem is that BR's usual approach to demand forecasting is not suitable for predicting the effects of non-marginal changes in levels of service at a local level. This is discussed in section 2. So the Institute for Transport Studies at Leeds University has been working since 1982 on the development of suitable forecasting approaches. In the course of this work a variety of approaches have been developed and tested. These include a simple Trip Rate Model (TRM), a direct demand model that we have entitled an Aggregate Simultaneous Model (ASM), and a disaggregate Mode Choice Model (MCM). These models are all based on actual behaviour/choices (that is, Revealed Preference (RP) data) ; they are discussed in section 3. An alternative approach is based on asking people directly how often they would use a new facility. This is termed the Stated Inten tions (SI) approach. It is well known that this, if applied without adjustment, is likely to lead to overestimates of usage. A Stated Preference (SP) experiment has been devised in order to correct for this bias. This SI/SP approach is discussed in section 4.

[1]  D. McFadden Quantitative Methods for Analyzing Travel Behaviour of Individuals: Some Recent Developments , 1977 .

[2]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  PREDICTING TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IN RESPONSE TO TRANSIT SERVICE CHANGES , 1983 .

[3]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  LABORATORY-SIMULATION VERSUS REVEALED-PREFERENCE METHODS FOR ESTIMATING TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS , 1981 .

[4]  F J Crittle,et al.  Basic logit (blogit) - technical manual , 1980 .

[5]  Lalita Sen,et al.  COMPARISON OF THE PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF FOUR MULTIATTRIBUTE APPROACHES TO ATTITUDINAL MEASUREMENT , 1982 .

[6]  John Bates,et al.  ECONOMETRIC ISSUES IN STATED PREFERENCE ANALYSIS , 1988 .

[7]  J. M. Preston,et al.  The evaluation of new local rail stations in West Yorkshire , 1987 .

[8]  J. Preston,et al.  Demand Forecasting for New Local Rail Services: A Case Study of a New Service Between Leicester and Burton-On-Trent , 1988 .

[9]  G Hyman,et al.  THE NESTED INCREMENTAL LOGIT MODEL: THEORY AND APPLICATION TO MODAL CHOICE --TRANSPORTATION PLANNING METHODS. PROCEEDINGS OF SEMINAR C HELD AT THE PTRC SUMMER ANNUAL MEETING, BATH UNIVERSITY ENGLAND, 7-11 SEPTEMBER 1987, VOLUME P290 , 1987 .

[10]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Estimating “tree” logit models , 1987 .

[11]  Richard B. Westin,et al.  Predictions from binary choice models , 1974 .

[12]  Kenneth Train,et al.  Diagnostic tests for the independence from irrelevant alternatives property of the multinomial logit model , 1976 .

[13]  Michael R Couture,et al.  ANALYZING TRAVELER ATTITUDES TO RESOLVE INTENDED AND ACTUAL USE OF A NEW TRANSIT SERVICE , 1981 .

[14]  P M Whitehead ESTIMATING THE EFFECTS ON REVENUE OF RAIL SERVICE CHANGES , 1981 .

[15]  Ashok Kumar USE OF INCREMENTAL FORM OF LOGIT MODELS IN DEMAND ANALYSIS , 1980 .