The dynamics of intellectual property rights for trust, knowledge sharing and innovation in project teams

Abstract The research question is: How can intellectual property rights (IPRs) influence trust, attitudes, commitment, knowledge sharing, and innovation in inter-organisational project teams? The four strategically selected team cases include eight global knowledge-intensive industrial oil service companies in Norway. The methodology included 24 in-depth interviews done in 2016. The study finds that formal intellectual property rights are key to building up and keeping trust in the team and also for building up the right attitudes within the team. The IPRs increased the innovativeness in the team and incremental innovations. The IPRs fostered a unique knowledge sharing in these four teams enabling them to work towards innovative solutions and delivering in time. Formal IPŔs foster informal trust and expertise sharing and by that also the inter- organizational cooperation. The confidence and knowledge sharing strengthen the possibility for future collaboration and innovations both on an individual level and on a corporate level. The theoretical implication of our findings is that IPRs increase the trust, commitment, and attitudes within the team providing knowledge sharing and innovativeness for improved solutions and results. IPRs are positive for collaboration, and they are complementary governance mechanisms. The practical implication is that IPRs must be defined and accepted before the corporations start up the inter-organizational teamwork. The contract typology should in the start up be sensitizing giving directions and security and in the end definitive.

[1]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals. , 1989 .

[2]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[3]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[4]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[5]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[6]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[7]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  Explaining Knowledge Sharing , 2006, Commun. Res..

[8]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[9]  Tom Rosendahl,et al.  Internal Communication as Value Creation in a Change Process: A Case Study of Norwegian Statoil , 2014 .

[10]  B. Hillebrand,et al.  Trust, Contract and Relationship Development , 2005 .

[11]  Hannu Vanharanta,et al.  Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context , 2003 .

[12]  P. Ritala,et al.  The dynamics of relational and contractual governance mechanisms in knowledge sharing of collaborative R&D projects , 2010 .

[13]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[14]  Min-Shi Liu,et al.  Human resource practices and individual knowledge-sharing behavior – an empirical study for Taiwanese R&D professionals , 2011 .

[15]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[16]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Rick Aalbers,et al.  The role of contracts and trust in R&D alliances in the Dutch biotech sector , 2010 .

[18]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Determinants of Goal Commitment , 1988 .

[19]  S. Newell,et al.  Managing Knowledge Work and Innovation , 2009 .

[20]  M. Schulz THE UNCERTAIN RELEVANCE OF NEWNESS: ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE FLOWS , 2001 .

[21]  L. Thurow,et al.  Needed: a new system of intellectual property rights. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[22]  R. Noe,et al.  Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research , 2010 .

[23]  Kyle J. Mayer,et al.  Complementarity and Evolution of Contractual Provisions: An Empirical Study of IT Services Contracts , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[24]  P. Ring,et al.  Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[25]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[26]  L. Hosmer TRUST: THE CONNECTING LINK BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY AND PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS , 1995 .

[27]  Pia Hurmelinna,et al.  Playing the collaboration game right—balancing trust and contracting , 2005 .

[28]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[29]  Leon Mann,et al.  Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance , 2010 .

[30]  L. Porter,et al.  The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. , 1979 .

[31]  Kyle J. Mayer,et al.  Learning to Contract: Evidence from the Personal Computer Industry , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing , 2006 .

[33]  Robert F. Lusch,et al.  Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective , 2015, MIS Q..

[34]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Encouraging knowledge sharing among employees: How job design matters , 2009 .

[35]  Terje I. Vaaland,et al.  Exploring interorganizational conflict in complex projects , 2003 .

[36]  D. Hislop Linking human resource management and knowledge management via commitment: A review and research agenda , 2003 .

[37]  H. Scarbrough Knowledge management, HRM and the innovation process , 2003 .

[38]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Trust, control and the role of interorganizational systems in electronic partnerships , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[39]  M. Ipe Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework , 2003 .

[40]  A. Kadefors Trust in project relationships-inside the black box , 2004 .

[41]  Annika Tidström,et al.  Competitive flows of intellectual capital in value creating networks , 2010 .

[42]  Dongyu Chen,et al.  Demystifying Moderate Variables of the Interrelationships among Affective Commitment, Job Performance, and Job Satisfaction of Construction Professionals , 2008 .

[43]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment in the workplace: toward a general model , 2001 .

[44]  Onno S. W. F. Omta,et al.  The Challenges of Collaborative Knowledge Creation in Open Innovation Teams , 2009 .

[45]  Patrick S. W. Fong,et al.  Knowledge creation in multidisciplinary project teams: an empirical study of the processes and their dynamic interrelationships , 2003 .

[46]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[47]  C. Shalley,et al.  WHAT LEADERS NEED TO KNOW: A REVIEW OF SOCIAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS THAT CAN FOSTER OR HINDER CREATIVITY , 2004 .

[48]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices , 2005 .

[49]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Service Innovation Viewed Through a Service-Dominant Logic Lens: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Analysis , 2011 .

[50]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Exploring Perceptions of Organizational Ownership of Information and Expertise , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..