Robust QCT/FEA Models of Proximal Femur Stiffness and Fracture Load During a Sideways Fall on the Hip

Clinical implementation of quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis (QCT/FEA) of proximal femur stiffness and strength to assess the likelihood of proximal femur (hip) fractures requires a unified modeling procedure, consistency in predicting bone mechanical properties, and validation with realistic test data that represent typical hip fractures, specifically, a sideways fall on the hip. We, therefore, used two sets (n = 9, each) of cadaveric femora with bone densities varying from normal to osteoporotic to build, refine, and validate a new class of QCT/FEA models for hip fracture under loading conditions that simulate a sideways fall on the hip. Convergence requirements of finite element models of the first set of femora led to the creation of a new meshing strategy and a robust process to model proximal femur geometry and material properties from QCT images. We used a second set of femora to cross-validate the model parameters derived from the first set. Refined models were validated experimentally by fracturing femora using specially designed fixtures, load cells, and high speed video capture. CT image reconstructions of fractured femora were created to classify the fractures. The predicted stiffness (cross-validation R2 = 0.87), fracture load (cross-validation R2 = 0.85), and fracture patterns (83% agreement) correlated well with experimental data.

[1]  S A Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  W. C. Hayes,et al.  Stress distributions within the proximal femur during gait and falls: Implications for osteoporotic fracture , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[3]  S. Giannini,et al.  Bone microarchitecture as an important determinant of bone strength , 2004, Journal of endocrinological investigation.

[4]  J H Keyak,et al.  Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  H K Genant,et al.  Advanced imaging of bone macro and micro structure. , 1999, Bone.

[7]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  W C Hayes,et al.  Age-related reductions in the strength of the femur tested in a fall-loading configuration. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Contribution of inter-site variations in architecture to trabecular bone apparent yield strains. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Nancy Lane,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of the Proximal Femur and Hip Fracture Risk in Older Men , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  H. Skinner,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  P. Cripton,et al.  During sideways falls proximal femur fractures initiate in the superolateral cortex: evidence from high-speed video of simulated fractures. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Biomechanics of Age-Related Fractures , 2001 .

[14]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  CHAPTER 23 – Biomechanics of Age-Related Fractures , 2008 .

[15]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions. , 2009, Bone.

[16]  H. Skinner,et al.  Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  W. Hayes,et al.  Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  S. Cummings,et al.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures , 2002, The Lancet.

[19]  S A Goldstein,et al.  Biomechanics of Fracture: Is Bone Mineral Density Sufficient to Assess Risk? , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  G. Niebur,et al.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Christian M. Langton,et al.  Comparison of 3D finite element analysis derived stiffness and BMD to determine the failure load of the excised proximal femur , 2009 .

[22]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  W. C. Hayes,et al.  Effects of loading rate on strength of the proximal femur , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[24]  S. Pors Nielsen The Fallacy of BMD: A Critical Review of the Diagnostic Use of Dual X-ray Absorptiometry , 2000 .

[25]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  鈴木 聡 Quantitative computed tomography : comparative study using different scanners with two calibration phantoms , 1993 .

[27]  J. H. Steiger Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[28]  Christoph Fankhauser,et al.  Femoroplasty-augmentation of mechanical properties in the osteoporotic proximal femur: a biomechanical investigation of PMMA reinforcement in cadaver bones. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[29]  L. Melton,et al.  A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis. , 2008, Bone.

[30]  J. Keyak Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[31]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: An in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.