AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
The aim of this paper is to explore the stroke literature, with particular emphasis on the management of psycho-social issues during and in the aftermath of stroke rehabilitation. Within the literature, there are a number of studies that indicate that the present 'medical/physical' approach to stroke rehabilitation may not be achieving desirable long-term psycho-social outcomes and these are considered. The studies highlight the potential effect of the human emotional and social aspects of having a stroke upon the physical and mental well-being of the person. For the person living with stroke, the ability to maintain a positive sense of direction in life as well as hold onto their, or develop a new, identity is crucial in terms of adapting to change. Holding onto one's self-worth and unity with the past and anticipating the future enhances the ability to cope and adapt in the aftermath of stroke rehabilitation. This links with the investigation into rehabilitation counselling as a potential strategy for the management of long-term psycho-social functional status following stroke.
CONCLUSION
It is suggested that the medical model of stroke rehabilitation places undue emphasis on clinical diagnosis and treatment. By default, measurement of physical independence or disability that is compressed into standardized scales has arguably led to the neglect of the emotional and social consequences of stroke and a partial or inhibited view of the person. It is proposed that there is a need to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation counselling from short-term stroke rehabilitation through to long-term psychosocial adaptation, for this client group to provide clear evidence for service provision.
[1]
D. Quinn,et al.
Stages of stroke: a model for stroke rehabilitation.
,
1998,
British journal of nursing.
[2]
A. Tennant,et al.
Outcome following stroke.
,
1997,
Disability and rehabilitation.
[3]
Y. Ben-Yishay.
Reflections on the Evolution of the Therapeutic Milieu Concept
,
1996
.
[4]
R. King.
Quality of life after stroke.
,
1996,
Stroke.
[5]
S. Ebrahim,et al.
Stroke patients' views on their admission to hospital
,
1995,
BMJ.
[6]
M. Lewinter,et al.
Patients' experience of rehabilitation after stroke.
,
1995,
Disability and rehabilitation.
[7]
J. Grimshaw,et al.
An interdisciplinary approach to the rehabilitation of people with brain injury
,
1994
.
[8]
S. Thorne.
Negotiating Health Care: The Social Context of Chronic Illness
,
1993
.
[9]
P. Griffiths.
Rehabilitation Counselling: The Development of a New Course Specialism in British Counselling.
,
1993
.
[10]
Christine B. Haley,et al.
Counselling after Stroke: An Unmet Need?
,
1992
.
[11]
R. Schall,et al.
Psychosocial Factors in Stroke Rehabilitation
,
1991
.
[12]
Simon J. Williams,et al.
OPCS Surveys of Disability in Great Britain, Report 1: The Prevalence of Disability Among Adults (Book).
,
1989
.
[13]
R L Evans,et al.
Family intervention after stroke: does counseling or education help?
,
1988,
Stroke.
[14]
H. Meltzer,et al.
The prevalence of disability among adults
,
1988
.
[15]
G. E. Gresham.
Stroke outcome research.
,
1986,
Stroke.
[16]
G. Prigatano,et al.
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation After Brain Injury
,
1985
.