Lifecycle performance assessment of fuel cell/battery electric vehicles

Abstract This paper has performed an assessment of lifecycle (as known as well-to-wheels, WTW) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy consumption of a fuel cell vehicle (FCV). The simulation tool MATLAB/Simulink is employed to examine the real-time behaviors of an FCV, which are used to determine the energy efficiency and the fuel economy of the FCV. Then, the GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation) model is used to analyze the fuel-cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions for hydrogen fuels. Three potential pathways of hydrogen production for FCV application are examined, namely, steam reforming of natural gas, water electrolysis using grid electricity, and water electrolysis using photovoltaic (PV) electricity, respectively. Results show that the FCV has the maximum system efficiency of 60%, which occurs at about 25% of the maximum net system power. In addition, the FCVs fueled with PV electrolysis hydrogen could reduce about 99.2% energy consumption and 46.6% GHG emissions as compared to the conventional gasoline vehicles (GVs). However, the lifecycle energy consumption and GHG emissions of the FCVs fueled with grid-electrolysis hydrogen are 35% and 52.8% respectively higher than those of the conventional GVs. As compared to the grid-based battery electric vehicles (BEVs), the FCVs fueled with reforming hydrogen from natural gas are about 79.0% and 66.4% in the lifecycle energy consumption and GHG emissions, respectively.

[1]  C. E. Thomas,et al.  Fuel cell and battery electric vehicles compared , 2009 .

[2]  Pierre Millet,et al.  Design and performance of a solid polymer electrolyte water electrolyzer , 1996 .

[3]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang,et al.  Sustainability study of hydrogen pathways for fuel cell vehicle applications , 2013 .

[4]  Matthew A Kromer,et al.  Electric powertrains : opportunities and challenges in the US light-duty vehicle fleet , 2007 .

[5]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang,et al.  Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emission and energy efficiency of hydrogen fuel cell scooters , 2010 .

[6]  Olivier Tremblay,et al.  Experimental validation of a battery dynamic model for EV applications , 2009 .

[7]  Karl-Heinz Hauer,et al.  A dynamic simulation tool for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles , 2005 .

[8]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Reducing the fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions of the US vehicle fleet , 2008 .

[9]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang Thermal-Electrochemical Modeling of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell , 2006 .

[10]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang,et al.  A three-dimensional numerical simulation of the transport phenomena in the cathodic side of a PEMFC , 2004 .

[11]  A. Veziroğlu,et al.  Fuel cell vehicles: State of the art with economic and environmental concerns , 2011 .

[12]  Jonathan X. Weinert,et al.  Hydrogen refueling station costs in Shanghai , 2006 .

[13]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang,et al.  Characteristic study on fuel cell/battery hybrid power system on a light electric vehicle , 2012 .

[14]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang,et al.  Development of a lightweight fuel cell vehicle , 2005 .

[15]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang Policy review of greenhouse gas emission reduction in Taiwan , 2011 .

[16]  M. Mahapatra,et al.  Glass-based seals for solid oxide fuel and electrolyzer cells - A review , 2010 .

[17]  Ned Djilali,et al.  A techno-economic analysis of decentralized electrolytic hydrogen production for fuel cell vehicles , 2005 .

[18]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  IEA-HIA Activities on Small-Scale Reformers for On-Site Hydrogen Supply , 2010 .

[19]  Ay Su,et al.  Development of a small vehicular PEM fuel cell system , 2008 .

[20]  P. M. Diéguez,et al.  Thermal performance of a commercial alkaline water electrolyzer: Experimental study and mathematical modeling , 2008 .

[21]  Ottmar Edenhofer,et al.  Technical Summary In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Technical Report , 2014 .

[22]  Michael Wang,et al.  Fuel choices for fuel-cell vehicles: well-to-wheels energy and emission impacts , 2002 .

[23]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang,et al.  Modeling of two-phase temperatures in a two-layer porous cathode of polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 2007 .

[24]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang,et al.  Development of fuel-cell-powered electric bicycle , 2004 .

[25]  Matthieu Dubarry,et al.  From single cell model to battery pack simulation for Li-ion batteries , 2009 .

[26]  Jason C. Ganley,et al.  High temperature and pressure alkaline electrolysis , 2009 .

[27]  Ay Su,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies of local current mapping on a PEM fuel cell , 2008 .

[28]  S. Aso,et al.  Development of Fuel Cell Hybrid Vehicles in TOYOTA , 2007, 2007 Power Conversion Conference - Nagoya.

[29]  S. Grigoriev,et al.  PEM water electrolyzers: From electrocatalysis to stack development , 2010 .

[30]  Fred Joseck,et al.  Hydrogen quality for fuel cell vehicles - a modeling study of the sensitivity of impurity content in hydrogen to the process variables in the SMR-PSA pathway. , 2009 .

[31]  Yu-Jie Chen,et al.  The study on the power management system in a fuel cell hybrid vehicle , 2012 .

[32]  Vicki P. McConnell,et al.  Downsized footprint and material changes for GM's fourth-generation fuel cell technology , 2007 .

[33]  T. Abdel-Baset,et al.  Comments on solid state hydrogen storage systems design for fuel cell vehicles , 2009 .

[34]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang,et al.  Effect of clamping pressure on the performance of a PEM fuel cell , 2007 .

[35]  T. Hertzberg,et al.  A preliminary design study of a multicomponent PSA gas separation system , 1996 .

[36]  D. Leung,et al.  Technological development of hydrogen production by solid oxide electrolyzer cell (SOEC) , 2008 .

[37]  K. Fujie,et al.  A demonstration project of the hydrogen station located on Yakushima Island—Operation and analysis of the station , 2007 .

[38]  John B. Heywood,et al.  The effect of uncertainty on US transport-related GHG emissions and fuel consumption out to 2050 , 2012 .