Legalizing a market for cannabis for pleasure: Colorado, Washington, Uruguay and beyond.

Colorado, Washington state and Uruguay are currently designing legal non-medical markets for cannabis. These clearly contravene the 1961 and 1988 drug conventions; options for what may happen next are discussed. The current provisions in the three regulatory schemes are summarized. From a public health perspective, the emphasis should be on holding down consumption with regulatory measures, but the public health agenda does not seem to be a strong consideration in the implementation of the US schemes, and they are paying little attention to what can be learned from the history of alcohol and tobacco regulation. While alternative paths to a cannabis market under the conventions are noted, the legalization initiatives underline the need to revise the drug conventions, making prohibition of domestic markets an optional matter. Such changes would also ease the path for including alcohol under the conventions, which would be an important step forward in global health.

[1]  D. Courtwright Mr. ATOD’s Wild Ride: What Do Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs Have in Common? , 2005, The Social History of Alcohol and Drugs.

[2]  Mahmoud A. ElSohly,et al.  Potency Trends of Δ9‐THC and Other Cannabinoids in Confiscated Cannabis Preparations from 1993 to 2008 * , 2010, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  R. Room Individualized Control of Drinkers: Back to the Future? , 2012 .

[4]  P. Reuter,et al.  How well do international drug conventions protect public health? , 2012, The Lancet.

[5]  David J Potter,et al.  Potency of Δ9–THC and Other Cannabinoids in Cannabis in England in 2005: Implications for Psychoactivity and Pharmacology * , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  R. Room Reform by subtraction: the path of denunciation of international drug treaties and reaccession with reservations. , 2012, The International journal on drug policy.

[7]  Randy W. Elder,et al.  Effects of alcohol retail privatization on excessive alcohol consumption and related harms: a community guide systematic review. , 2012, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  M. Jelsma,et al.  The UN Drug Control Conventions: The Limits of Latitude , 2012 .

[9]  L. Gostin Corporate speech and the Constitution: the deregulation of tobacco advertising. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[10]  D. Bewley-Taylor,et al.  Regime change: re-visiting the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. , 2012, The International journal on drug policy.

[11]  Lawrence D Phillips,et al.  Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis , 2010, The Lancet.

[12]  L. Henkin International Law as Law in the United States , 1984 .

[13]  R. Room Alcohol and harm reduction, then and now , 2004 .