Modeling tropical montane forest biomass, productivity and canopy traits with multispectral remote sensing data

Abstract Tropical montane forests, particularly Andean rainforest, are important ecosystems for regional carbon and water cycles as well as for biological diversity and speciation. Owing to their remoteness, however, ecological key-processes are less understood as in the tropical lowlands. Remote sensing allows modeling of variables related to spatial patterns of carbon stocks and fluxes (e.g., biomass) and ecosystem functioning (e.g., functional leaf traits). However, at a landscape scale most studies conducted so far are based on airborne remote sensing data which is often available only locally and for one time-point. In contrast, multispectral satellites at moderate spectral and spatial resolutions are able to provide spatially continuous and repeated observations. Here, we investigated the effectiveness of Landsat-8 imagery in modeling tropical montane forest biomass, its productivity and selected canopy traits. Topographical, spectral and textural metrics were derived as predictors. To train and validate the models, in-situ data was sampled in 54 permanent plots in forests of southern Ecuador distributed within three study sites at 1000 m, 2000 m and 3000 m a.s.l. We used partial least squares regressions to model and map all response variables. Along the whole elevation gradient biomass and productivity models explained 31%, 43%, 69% and 63% of variance in aboveground biomass, annual wood production, fine litter production and aboveground net primary production, respectively. Regression models of canopy traits measured as community weighted means explained 62%, 78%, 65% and 65% of variance in leaf toughness, specific leaf area, foliar N concentration, and foliar P concentration, respectively. Models at single study sites hardly explained variation in aboveground biomass and the annual wood production indicating that these measures are mainly determined by the change of forest types along with elevation. In contrast, the models of fine litter production and canopy traits explained between 8%–85% in variation depending on the study site. We found spectral metrics, in particular a vegetation index using the red and the green band to provide complementary information to topographical metrics. The model performances for estimating leaf toughness, biochemical canopy traits and related fine litter production all improved when adding spectral information. Our findings therefore revealed that differences in fine litter production and canopy traits in our study area are driven by local changes in vegetation edaphically induced by topography. We conclude that Landsat-derived metrics are useful in modeling fine litter production and biochemical canopy traits, in a topographically and ecologically complex tropical montane forest.

[1]  X. Li,et al.  Comparative analysis of NPP changes in global tropical forests from 2001 to 2013 , 2017 .

[2]  S. Schmidtlein,et al.  Mapping plant strategy types using remote sensing , 2012 .

[3]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters , 1998 .

[4]  J. Chambers,et al.  Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests , 2005, Oecologia.

[5]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  Advances in remote sensing of vegetation function and traits , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[6]  Florian Hartig,et al.  Importance of sample size, data type and prediction method for remote sensing-based estimations of aboveground forest biomass , 2014 .

[7]  L. Lymburner,et al.  Estimation of Canopy-Average Surface-Specific Leaf Area Using Landsat TM Data , 2000 .

[8]  M. Claverie,et al.  Preliminary analysis of the performance of the Landsat 8/OLI land surface reflectance product. , 2016, Remote sensing of environment.

[9]  Nathaniel P. Robinson,et al.  Terrestrial primary production for the conterminous United States derived from Landsat 30 m and MODIS 250 m , 2018 .

[10]  S. Hättenschwiler,et al.  Leaf traits and decomposition in tropical rainforests: revisiting some commonly held views and towards a new hypothesis. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[11]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  The hydraulic limitation hypothesis revisited. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[12]  K. Anderson‐Teixeira,et al.  Carbon dynamics of mature and regrowth tropical forests derived from a pantropical database (TropForC‐db) , 2016, Global change biology.

[13]  Frans Bongers,et al.  Above-ground biomass and productivity in a rain forest of eastern South America , 2008, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[14]  V. Radeloff,et al.  Image texture as a remotely sensed measure of vegetation structure , 2012 .

[15]  Jürgen Homeier,et al.  Effects of soil chemistry on tropical forest biomass and productivity at different elevations in the equatorial Andes , 2012, Oecologia.

[16]  Jürgen Homeier,et al.  The Carbon Balance of Tropical Mountain Forests Along an Altitudinal Transect , 2013 .

[17]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Spectral and chemical analysis of tropical forests: Scaling from leaf to canopy levels , 2008 .

[18]  W. Cohen,et al.  Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes. , 2006 .

[19]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  Specific leaf area estimation from leaf and canopy reflectance through optimization and validation of vegetation indices , 2017 .

[20]  Michele Dalponte,et al.  Topography shapes the structure, composition and function of tropical forest landscapes , 2018, Ecology letters.

[21]  G. Komen,et al.  Climate variability , 2008, The Climate System.

[22]  Timothy Dube,et al.  Estimating Above-Ground Biomass in Sub-Tropical Buffer Zone Community Forests, Nepal, Using Sentinel 2 Data , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[23]  Yi Ding,et al.  Within- and among-species variation in specific leaf area drive community assembly in a tropical cloud forest , 2011, Oecologia.

[24]  G. Foody,et al.  Predictive relations of tropical forest biomass from Landsat TM data and their transferability between regions , 2003 .

[25]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Disentangling the contribution of biological and physical properties of leaves and canopies in imaging spectroscopy data , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Solar radiation and functional traits explain the decline of forest primary productivity along a tropical elevation gradient. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[27]  Jörg Bendix,et al.  The Ecosystem (Reserva Biológica San Francisco) , 2008 .

[28]  R. Brandl,et al.  Contrasting performance of Lidar and optical texture models in predicting avian diversity in a tropical mountain forest , 2016 .

[29]  J. Terborgh,et al.  The above‐ground coarse wood productivity of 104 Neotropical forest plots , 2004 .

[30]  R.M. Haralick,et al.  Statistical and structural approaches to texture , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[31]  F. Woodward,et al.  Terrestrial Gross Carbon Dioxide Uptake: Global Distribution and Covariation with Climate , 2010, Science.

[32]  C. Jun,et al.  Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present , 2005 .

[33]  Matthias Drusch,et al.  Sentinel-2: ESA's Optical High-Resolution Mission for GMES Operational Services , 2012 .

[34]  Tahir Mehmood,et al.  A review of variable selection methods in Partial Least Squares Regression , 2012 .

[35]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Variations in Amazon forest productivity correlated with foliar nutrients and modelled rates of photosynthetic carbon supply , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  L. Poorter,et al.  Leaf Traits Determine the Growth‐Survival Trade‐Off across Rain Forest Tree Species , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[37]  E. Veldkamp,et al.  Nitrogen availability links forest productivity, soil nitrous oxide and nitric oxide fluxes of a tropical montane forest in southern Ecuador , 2011 .

[38]  Jonathan M. Adams,et al.  Global pattern of NPP to GPP ratio derived from MODIS data: effects of ecosystem type, geographical location and climate , 2009 .

[39]  S. Ollinger Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[40]  Takeshi Motohka,et al.  Applicability of Green-Red Vegetation Index for Remote Sensing of Vegetation Phenology , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[41]  K. Treseder,et al.  Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. , 2008, Ecology.

[42]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Retrieval of Specific Leaf Area From Landsat-8 Surface Reflectance Data Using Statistical and Physical Models , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[43]  David L. R. Affleck,et al.  Future global productivity will be affected by plant trait response to climate , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[44]  J. Homeier,et al.  Functional traits determine tree growth and ecosystem productivity of a tropical montane forest: Insights from a long‐term nutrient manipulation experiment , 2018, Global change biology.

[45]  Jörg Bendix,et al.  Land‐cover classification in the Andes of southern Ecuador using Landsat ETM+ data as a basis for SVAT modelling , 2009 .

[46]  Samuel Adelabu,et al.  Remote sensing of aboveground forest biomass : A review , 2015 .

[47]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Reply to Townsend et al.: Decoupling contributions from canopy structure and leaf optics is critical for remote sensing leaf biochemistry , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  O. Mutanga,et al.  Evaluating the utility of the medium-spatial resolution Landsat 8 multispectral sensor in quantifying aboveground biomass in uMgeni catchment, South Africa , 2015 .

[49]  M. Batistella,et al.  Exploring TM Image Texture and its Relationships with Biomass Estimation in Rondônia, Brazilian Amazon. , 2005 .

[50]  T. Hwang,et al.  Optical remote sensing of terrestrial ecosystem primary productivity , 2013 .

[51]  Heather Reese,et al.  Mapping Tree Canopy Cover and Aboveground Biomass in Sudano-Sahelian Woodlands Using Landsat 8 and Random Forest , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[52]  Michael E. Schaepman,et al.  Sentinels for science: potential of Sentinel-1, -2, and -3 missions for scientific observations of ocean, cryosphere, and land , 2012 .

[53]  Jürgen Homeier,et al.  Is tropical montane forest heterogeneity promoted by a resource-driven feedback cycle? Evidence from nutrient relations, herbivory and litter decomposition along a topographical gradient , 2015 .

[54]  Lijuan Liu,et al.  A survey of remote sensing-based aboveground biomass estimation methods in forest ecosystems , 2016, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[55]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Convergent elevation trends in canopy chemical traits of tropical forests , 2016, Global change biology.

[56]  C. Reudenbach,et al.  Diurnal patterns of rainfall in a tropical Andean valley of southern Ecuador as seen by a vertically pointing K‐band Doppler radar , 2006 .

[57]  Yadvinder Malhi,et al.  Forest biomass, productivity and carbon cycling along a rainfall gradient in West Africa , 2018, Global change biology.

[58]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[59]  O. Mutanga,et al.  Investigating the robustness of the new Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager derived texture metrics in estimating plantation forest aboveground biomass in resource constrained areas , 2015 .

[60]  N. Coops Characterizing Forest Growth and Productivity Using Remotely Sensed Data , 2015, Current Forestry Reports.

[61]  S. Ollinger,et al.  Examining spectral reflectance features related to foliar nitrogen in forests: Implications for broad-scale nitrogen mapping , 2016 .

[62]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Hyperspectral remote sensing of foliar nitrogen content , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[64]  Lukas W. Lehnert,et al.  Land Cover Change in the Andes of Southern Ecuador - Patterns and Drivers , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[65]  Kanehiro Kitayama,et al.  Natural Resource Ecology and Management 1-2006 Temperature Influences Carbon Accumulation in Moist Tropical Forests , 2017 .

[66]  M. Schaepman,et al.  Review of optical-based remote sensing for plant trait mapping , 2013 .

[67]  Jason C. Neff,et al.  Estimates of Aboveground Biomass from Texture Analysis of Landsat Imagery , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[68]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Quantifying the influences of spectral resolution on uncertainty in leaf trait estimates through a Bayesian approach to RTM inversion , 2016 .

[69]  Gabriel Popkin US government considers charging for popular Earth-observing data , 2018, Nature.

[70]  J. Guinan,et al.  Multiscale Terrain Analysis of Multibeam Bathymetry Data for Habitat Mapping on the Continental Slope , 2007 .

[71]  Peter B Reich,et al.  Key canopy traits drive forest productivity , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[72]  R. Brandl,et al.  Remote sensing improves prediction of tropical montane species diversity but performance differs among taxa , 2017 .

[73]  E. Beck,et al.  Facing a hotspot of tropical biodiversity , 2008 .

[74]  S. Ollinger,et al.  DIRECT ESTIMATION OF ABOVEGROUND FOREST PRODUCTIVITY THROUGH HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING OF CANOPY NITROGEN , 2002 .

[75]  Mahendra Singh Nathawat,et al.  A review of radar remote sensing for biomass estimation , 2015, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[76]  D. Hoekman,et al.  Review of relationships between grey-tone co-occurrence, semivariance, and autocorrelation based image texture analysis approaches , 2005 .

[77]  P. Reich,et al.  Generality of leaf trait relationships: a test across six biomes: Ecology , 1999 .

[78]  Steve Frolking,et al.  Nitrogen cycling, forest canopy reflectance, and emergent properties of ecosystems , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  P. Reich,et al.  Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[80]  Fabien Quétier,et al.  Assessing functional diversity in the field - methodology matters! , 2007 .

[81]  Oscar J. Abelleira Martínez,et al.  Scaling up functional traits for ecosystem services with remote sensing: concepts and methods , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[82]  D. Spracklen,et al.  Tropical montane forests are a larger than expected global carbon store , 2014 .

[83]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Does functional trait diversity predict above‐ground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypotheses , 2015 .

[84]  Hormoz Sohrabi,et al.  ABILITY OF LANDSAT-8 OLI DERIVED TEXTURE METRICS IN ESTIMATING ABOVEGROUND CARBON STOCKS OF COPPICE OAK FORESTS , 2016 .

[85]  Chandra Shekhar Jha,et al.  Estimating the leaf area index in Indian tropical forests using Landsat-8 OLI data , 2017 .

[86]  C. Leuschner,et al.  Tree Diversity, Forest Structure and Productivity along Altitudinal and Topographical Gradients in a Species‐Rich Ecuadorian Montane Rain Forest , 2010 .